• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kristallnacht was a spontaneous even by the German people. How far do these sources support this claim?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question F: Study all the sources. "Kristallnacht was a spontaneous even by the German people." How far do these sources support this claim? [12] The riots, violence, profanation, destruction and death that marked Kristallnacht throughout Nazi Germany in 1938 were no accidental act of violation, but a deliberately incited and massive, attack on the Jews of Germany, their synagogues and properties, through the arms of the Gestapo, the Police and the SD. From Berlin across all of Germany, it marked the beginning of the end for the Jews of Germany. I will begin studying the sources that suggest that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event that more or less in a way say that Kristallnacht was the fault of the German people. Source B is a secret report by the Nazi Party Supreme Court after the events of Kristallnacht. The source tells us of how the Nazi party were not to discourage demonstrations, but they were not to be organized by the party. The source does suggest that Kristallnacht was not planned by the Nazi party but a wave of violence by the German people as the Nazi party were told not to participate in the demonstrations. The source does tell us how there was mass destruction caused by the violence. This source is implying that the normal German people started the attacks. ...read more.

Middle

Source C is an account written by David Buffman, the American Consul in Germany at the time of Kristallnacht. He describes how the violence started on 10 November and that the German people were horrified by the acts of the Nazi's violence. He goes on to describe how the SS men and Stormtroopers not in uniform were provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs. The statement that the SS men and Stormtroopers were not in uniform implies that the Nazi party did not want it to be apparent that they were generating racial hatred towards the Jewish people. David Buffman could be seen as an unbiased source which would make this source reliable and crucial to answer who were behind the attacks on Kristallnacht. Source E was a note signed by a civil servant who had sent a note to the British Consul in Cologne, Germany on the 12th of November, 1938. In this source it clearly states that most German people had nothing to do with the events that happened over Kristallnacht, and supports the claim made in source C about the fact that SA men had been provided with house breaking tools, axes and ladders to attack the Jewish buildings. They had been given a list of names to find the buildings exactly where the Jewish people lived. ...read more.

Conclusion

the fact it was written by a German Jew who was one of the targets by the Nazis, so they were writing a first witness account. On the other hand, there is the fact that is biased towards the Jews because they just wanted to say and show that the Nazis were wrong and should be gone with. Source D has a very vague meaning and does not state clearly who actually was responsible for the events that happened on the night of Kristallnacht. After studying all of the sources i have arrived to the conclusion that Kristallnacht was not completely a spontaneous event by the German people but, also hugely participated by the Nazi party. The sources that state that the German people were behind the attacks were on the whole biased and from unreliable writers apart from Source B. The remainder of the sources tell us that the Nazi party were behind the wave of violence on Kristallnacht, many of the sources also imply that the Nazi's did not want to be seen as responsible for the violence. Due to the reliability of Source B i have to take into account that the German people participated in the wave of violence of Kristallnacht but, largely i can see from the sources that it was not a spontaneous wave of violence but a planned attack by the Nazi party on the Jewish people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Source D makes Source C less reliable, as it contradicts it entirely. Whilst source C claims that 'the violence was carried out by SS men and Stormtroopers', source D clearly states that Kristallnacht could have been spontaneous as 'already for a few weeks there had been signs of unrest among the masses'.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    However, it is possible that the Jew writing this account wanted to see the uprisings as a result of the German people, rather than the Nazi party. Source B, too, has its limitations; it demonstrates that primary sources are not always useful, because in this case, it is likely that

  1. How far were the German people responsible for the Holocaust?

    This disproves David Irving's theory. In his book 'Hitler's War' he states, using what he claimed to be new evidence and interpretations of known documents, that Hitler was totally without responsibility of the Jewish pogrom during the Holocaust. He does this by having a complete disregard for the truth or accuracy.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    To do this, we have to see what the source tells us and how reliable it is. There are 3 different theories between these 9 different sources. Source A states how it was Goebbels idea whilst source H agrees with this.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    In conclusion, I don't think that sources F and H completely prove that Goering was telling lies as they are too unreliable to be used to say that he was. Even though I think that Goering was telling lies, there is not enough proof from the sources so I cannot justify that.

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    By mentioning that they will not turn back, whatever the league throws at them will, in effect, not stop Italy. Another reason for the league to be worried relates to what Mussolini says at the end of his speech. In his speech, Mussolini says that "It is better to live

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    views by the last Tsar of Russia and how he suffered as a result. One can tell that the bottom figure is a Nazi soldier because he is dressed in the Nazi uniform; and that the attacks he has made are recent and violent because he uses weapons - there

  2. Study all the sources.

    This means that Buffman had no reason to lie in his account. Buffman writes of the violence carried out by the Nazi SA men, who were not in uniform. These SA men were armed with hammers, axes and fire bombs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work