• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There would have been no second revolution without Lenin How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


"There would have been no second revolution without Lenin" How far do you agree with this statement? After the February revolution in 1917 in which the Tsar was forced to abdicate the Provisional Government was formed but after a few turbulent months in power it was forced out after the Bolshevik revolution in October of 1917. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks and his arrival in Petrograd after being in hiding in Finland was very important as it was Lenin who persuaded the other Bolshevik leaders to seize power sooner rather than later. Without Lenin there may have been a second revolution but it may not have been a Bolshevik one, especially as so many of the Bolshevik leaders wanted to wait before the planned revolution, and it may not have had the success of the October revolution. The situation in Russia was perhaps such that any revolution would have had some degree of success, Russians felt failed by the Provisional Government especially because the war was still taking place and peasants had not been given land. ...read more.


However railway workers stopped the trains carrying the troops and Kornilov failed, the Red Guards kept their guns and the Bolsheviks were seen as being the 'saviours of Petrograd' and their support was at an all time high and the time seemed to be right for a revolution .There were factors completely beyond the control of Lenin that meant the second revolution was successful and although he played a big part in organising the revolution its success was also down to other factors outside of the Bolsheviks. Although it was Lenin who was most determined for the revolution to happen sooner rather than later the other Bolsheviks did play an important role in guaranteeing the success of the revolution. Lenin was very well known in Russia and his fame and his ability to win over people may have been important but was not the only way the Bolshevik's gained support. For example the Bolshevik's slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land" and the simplicity of this message meant that many Russian's supported the Bolsheviks and although Lenin's famous oratory skills may have gained the Bolshevik's some support ...read more.


The Bolsheviks were seemingly the most well organised revolutionary group and their promises of "Bread, Peace and Land" secured support for them and although Lenin was clearly an important figure it was not at all completely down to him that the Bolshevik Revolution was a success, although it is important to consider how long it might have take for the Bolshevik Revolution to take place where it not for Lenin's constant pressure for action on the other Bolsheviks. Overall I feel that although there were clearly other factors that affected the success of the second revolution, most notably the failings of the Provisional Government, without Lenin the Bolsheviks might not have tried to seize power till later and may not have had as much success, if the Bolsheviks revolution had not take place there might not have been any second revolution as there were few other groups as strong as the Bolsheviks. I think that although the second revolution was not completely down to Lenin he played a very important role in it and it would have not been the same, or even happened at all without him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    So, when Alexandra and Rasputin got close as we can we see in a letter stolen from Rasputin that was written by Alexandra, "My much loved never to be forgotten teacher. I am so wretched without you. My soul is only rested and at easy when you my teacher are near me.

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    The prime reason for this was the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861 when they were given their own piece of land to be paid for with a loan to the government. For the emancipated serf, who was producing fruitful crops and benefiting financially from it, was able to purchase more land.

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    into his own plans, which was known as later to be 'Socialism in One Country' Lenin's impact on Russia and the Russian people Lenin had a great impact on Russia, he created a world power house and he is still seen by many historians as an icon.

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    living conditions in towns and countryside led to a wave of strikes, demonstrations and protests. Ministers warned the Tsar that Russia was close to revolution, but the Tsar believed he was invincible, and was thoroughly convinced that he knew, and was in control of what was going on.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Out of a population of one hundred and twenty five million, eight to fourteen million people were purged. This is a relatively small percentage, about ten percent. It could be said that ten percent of the population of the population suffered to benefit the 'masses' (the other ninety percent)

  2. In what sense did the policies of collectivization and industrialization constitute a second revolution ...

    The process of collectivization was painful and highly resented. Force was in common use13 and the kulaks were persecuted heavily. By March 1930 60% of peasant farms had been collectivized14. Even though there were bad harvests state procurements continued, creating famine in the rural areas15.

  1. "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree ...

    However, this was not the case. Ironically, it helped strengthened the Tsar's power. The forming of the Duma appeased the liberals and satisfied their appetite for reforms, hence they are willing to cooperate with the Tsar rather than confront Tsarism directly.

  2. How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

    However, without any of Lenin?s influence we can be pretty certain this revolution would have still of taken place with the help of additional factors, such as; The Tsarina and Rasputin?s relationship putting question on the corruptness of the monarch to the people; The formation of the soviets which were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work