• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There would have been no second revolution without Lenin How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


"There would have been no second revolution without Lenin" How far do you agree with this statement? After the February revolution in 1917 in which the Tsar was forced to abdicate the Provisional Government was formed but after a few turbulent months in power it was forced out after the Bolshevik revolution in October of 1917. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks and his arrival in Petrograd after being in hiding in Finland was very important as it was Lenin who persuaded the other Bolshevik leaders to seize power sooner rather than later. Without Lenin there may have been a second revolution but it may not have been a Bolshevik one, especially as so many of the Bolshevik leaders wanted to wait before the planned revolution, and it may not have had the success of the October revolution. The situation in Russia was perhaps such that any revolution would have had some degree of success, Russians felt failed by the Provisional Government especially because the war was still taking place and peasants had not been given land. ...read more.


However railway workers stopped the trains carrying the troops and Kornilov failed, the Red Guards kept their guns and the Bolsheviks were seen as being the 'saviours of Petrograd' and their support was at an all time high and the time seemed to be right for a revolution .There were factors completely beyond the control of Lenin that meant the second revolution was successful and although he played a big part in organising the revolution its success was also down to other factors outside of the Bolsheviks. Although it was Lenin who was most determined for the revolution to happen sooner rather than later the other Bolsheviks did play an important role in guaranteeing the success of the revolution. Lenin was very well known in Russia and his fame and his ability to win over people may have been important but was not the only way the Bolshevik's gained support. For example the Bolshevik's slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land" and the simplicity of this message meant that many Russian's supported the Bolsheviks and although Lenin's famous oratory skills may have gained the Bolshevik's some support ...read more.


The Bolsheviks were seemingly the most well organised revolutionary group and their promises of "Bread, Peace and Land" secured support for them and although Lenin was clearly an important figure it was not at all completely down to him that the Bolshevik Revolution was a success, although it is important to consider how long it might have take for the Bolshevik Revolution to take place where it not for Lenin's constant pressure for action on the other Bolsheviks. Overall I feel that although there were clearly other factors that affected the success of the second revolution, most notably the failings of the Provisional Government, without Lenin the Bolsheviks might not have tried to seize power till later and may not have had as much success, if the Bolsheviks revolution had not take place there might not have been any second revolution as there were few other groups as strong as the Bolsheviks. I think that although the second revolution was not completely down to Lenin he played a very important role in it and it would have not been the same, or even happened at all without him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    no incentive to sell his produce, given the inadequate supply of manufactured goods.'5 Coupled with this failure was the reluctant nature of the Provisional Government to effectively seize command. 'The...members were extremely reluctant to seize the power that had been handed to them...this reluctance was translated into the generally conservative

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    So, when Alexandra and Rasputin got close as we can we see in a letter stolen from Rasputin that was written by Alexandra, "My much loved never to be forgotten teacher. I am so wretched without you. My soul is only rested and at easy when you my teacher are near me.

  1. "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree ...

    against the Tsar as long as the Russians felt that their welfare was not taken to heart by the government, the problem of land hunger was never solved. Stolypin's economic reforms provoked resentment from farmers in the communes against those who left the communes, adding a new dimension to peasant tensions.

  2. Explain Trotsky's contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922

    Secondly Trotsky would use propaganda to his advantage with the use of agit-props. They would suggest to the Russian people that letting The Whites win is just going back to the old system. With the visuals of agit-props the Red Army spread communist ideas rapidly making more people enlist in the army.

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    In basic terms Lenin wanted a smaller party and Martov wanted it to be open to all. This resulted in a split, after a series of votes, in the party becoming two separate parties the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    living conditions in towns and countryside led to a wave of strikes, demonstrations and protests. Ministers warned the Tsar that Russia was close to revolution, but the Tsar believed he was invincible, and was thoroughly convinced that he knew, and was in control of what was going on.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Stalin is recalling an incident that occurred thirty years before, between 1900 and before the Bolshevik revolution, when he was exiled in Siberia. This was written at a time when the Russians were drawing to a close the Second World War and the cold war was beginning to set in.

  2. How far do you agree that the 1905 revolution was a revolution without revolutionaries?

    Many were unsatisfied with the major cultural barrier between Russia and Europe, as Russia was not progressing into 'modern times' like them. This was to do with the Tsars lack of effort for reforms. The Romanov Imperial family had ruled Russia for more than three hundred years by absolute autocracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work