• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There would have been no second revolution without Lenin How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"There would have been no second revolution without Lenin" How far do you agree with this statement? After the February revolution in 1917 in which the Tsar was forced to abdicate the Provisional Government was formed but after a few turbulent months in power it was forced out after the Bolshevik revolution in October of 1917. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks and his arrival in Petrograd after being in hiding in Finland was very important as it was Lenin who persuaded the other Bolshevik leaders to seize power sooner rather than later. Without Lenin there may have been a second revolution but it may not have been a Bolshevik one, especially as so many of the Bolshevik leaders wanted to wait before the planned revolution, and it may not have had the success of the October revolution. The situation in Russia was perhaps such that any revolution would have had some degree of success, Russians felt failed by the Provisional Government especially because the war was still taking place and peasants had not been given land. ...read more.

Middle

However railway workers stopped the trains carrying the troops and Kornilov failed, the Red Guards kept their guns and the Bolsheviks were seen as being the 'saviours of Petrograd' and their support was at an all time high and the time seemed to be right for a revolution .There were factors completely beyond the control of Lenin that meant the second revolution was successful and although he played a big part in organising the revolution its success was also down to other factors outside of the Bolsheviks. Although it was Lenin who was most determined for the revolution to happen sooner rather than later the other Bolsheviks did play an important role in guaranteeing the success of the revolution. Lenin was very well known in Russia and his fame and his ability to win over people may have been important but was not the only way the Bolshevik's gained support. For example the Bolshevik's slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land" and the simplicity of this message meant that many Russian's supported the Bolsheviks and although Lenin's famous oratory skills may have gained the Bolshevik's some support ...read more.

Conclusion

The Bolsheviks were seemingly the most well organised revolutionary group and their promises of "Bread, Peace and Land" secured support for them and although Lenin was clearly an important figure it was not at all completely down to him that the Bolshevik Revolution was a success, although it is important to consider how long it might have take for the Bolshevik Revolution to take place where it not for Lenin's constant pressure for action on the other Bolsheviks. Overall I feel that although there were clearly other factors that affected the success of the second revolution, most notably the failings of the Provisional Government, without Lenin the Bolsheviks might not have tried to seize power till later and may not have had as much success, if the Bolsheviks revolution had not take place there might not have been any second revolution as there were few other groups as strong as the Bolsheviks. I think that although the second revolution was not completely down to Lenin he played a very important role in it and it would have not been the same, or even happened at all without him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    approach to the solution of Russia's problems.'6 This conservatism and inefficiency to solving the numerous internal problems generated further popular discontent. The Provisional Government's lack of 'genuine' authority contributed to the success of the Bolshevik revolution in October, 1917. The Dual Authority exercised between the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet, indeed crippled the government's integrity of rule.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    Alexis had inherited a rare blood disease Haemophilia. In 1905 Alexandra employed a man called Rasputin that was said to have special powers to stop bleeding and pain, to look after Alexis. However people noticed something unusual about his eyes and that Rasputin was a heavy drinker and that he fascinated women.

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    What made them so different? One common view that was held was that the reason many citizen's revolted was because they were not land owners however the truth is on the contrary, the Russian peasants had far more privately owned land than in England were the nobles owned the majority of property.

  2. "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree ...

    The liberals and peasants were willing to cooperate with government while other opponents were suppressed. The power of the Tsar was still intent and he still commanded the loyalty of the army which formed a main source of his power, however, upon evaluating the situation in Russia with a deeper

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Land was taken from the rich and given to the poor, all industries were taken over by the state and given control to government run committees and he introduce a new Labour Law was stated that workers could only work a maximum of eight hours a day, Lenin also banned

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    living conditions in towns and countryside led to a wave of strikes, demonstrations and protests. Ministers warned the Tsar that Russia was close to revolution, but the Tsar believed he was invincible, and was thoroughly convinced that he knew, and was in control of what was going on.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    (LCW, Vol. 27, pp. 372-3.) 29th July 1918: "We never harboured the illusion that the forces of the proletariat and the revolutionary people of any one country, however heroic and however organised and disciplined they might be, could overthrow international imperialism. That can be done only by the joint efforts of the workers of the

  2. How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

    councils formed by elected workers and peasants which were attractive to the people as a good option for new ways to find new leaders; The discontent of the peasant farmers in the countryside and how they were being treated by the regime and The DUMA setting up an alternative and more attractive government to many.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work