• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster. (A.J.P Taylor) Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to I to support this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." (A.J.P Taylor) Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to I to support this interpretation? In order to tell whether there is enough evidence in sources D to I to support the interpretation I need to look at each sources reliability and value. I also need to decide whether Dunkirk was a success and a disaster at the same time. Source D shows a contemporary painting of the time. This could imply that it is reliable because it is of the time. However, the artist was most definitely employed by the government to make Dunkirk look like a great victory. This means that it would be biased in making everything look good. I also do not know where the artist got the information from. It is very unlikely that he was there at the time so no probably got it from other sources. These sources are going to be modified by the government. The painting shows a lot of boats there for the rescue and it also shows a lot of troops there to be rescued. ...read more.


I know that the government covered up what really happened and this is an example of how. The purpose of this speech was to keep the moral of the British public high. If they told them what had really happened the public would lose all hope of victory. This tells me that Dunkirk was a great disaster because the government are trying to cover it up. If everything went according to plan they wouldn't have to cover anything up. Looking at it from the point of view of the public, Dunkirk was a great deliverance because they refused to accept defeat. Source H is an extract from a British newspaper at the time. Although it is a primary source it is not reliable because the information is from the government. Because it is a contemporary source, government censorship prevented papers from publishing anything that suggests a defeat. Therefore, it is going to be biased in making the army look like heroes. I can see this because it says "TIRED, DIRTY, HUNGRY, TEHY CAME BACK - UNBEATABLE. I know that they were beaten because they had to be evacuated. ...read more.


Sources D, G and H are less reliable because they have been based on government information. This information is most likely to be biased to keep the moral of the public high. Sources E and F both show me what it was like at Dunkirk. They show great deliverance because of the amount of troops that were evacuated was massive and that the troops were still fighting. It also shows a great disaster because the troops are having to evacuate which suggests defeat. Finally, Source I was written in a book after the time by a historian. It is unlikely to be biased and it is not based on government information. It suggests a great deliverance because of the amount of troops rescued and that citizen boats joined in. It also suggests great disaster because the BEF had lost most of its equipment and that six destroyers were destroyed and 474 aeroplanes were lost. If the government had not covered it up the British publics' moral would have gone down and they would have lost all chance of victory. The whole of Operation Dynamo was a success however; the British had been pushed right out of France in great defeat. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The date of the account is unknown making it less reliable as some days, 27th May, the afternoon of the 29th May and the 1st of June, there was heavy Luftwaffe bombing which could have caused the severe demoralisation. The source goes against my previous knowledge and other sources such as 14(i)

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    Here he says what the British had lost during the evacuation and not what they had achieved, which was portrayed in sources revealed at the time of war. So you can see a big change of attitude of the British people as they knew what the truth was but didn't

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Anyway this is only one account, one sided and biased. I know that some of his account was written at night therefore some details maybe missing. When he said about the Officers using revolvers, this may have only been true for one group of soldiers, the rest may be fine.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    But on the other hand he might have exaggerated this for sales purposes, by writing what they British public want to hear, and also this experience might have only been a one off. Private W.B.A Graze tells me how the soldiers were fighting amongst each other to for evacuation boats.

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    On the 6 o'clock BBC Radio news, the official statement from the Ministry of Information was broadcast: "Men of the undefeated BEF have been coming home from France. They have not come back in triumph they have come back in glory."

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The Luftwaffes dive-bombing was affective due to them coming up against little resistance, they managed to kill many men buy bombing ships and beaches. The Allied forces could only watch as German pilots attacked the beaches and rescue ships wave after wave.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    Immediately this tells me it is a book of learning so will state facts and will had collected different evidence because it is secondary, but where it covers such a large area of war history it will not be in great detail.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It shows a soldier (possibly British) standing defiantly on the shores of Dunkirk with one arm in the air showing determination and courage. He is trying to portray to the Germans that he is not afraid; he is adamant not to give up and is showing a positive attitude.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work