• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. Neil DeMarco, The Second World War, Hodder & Stoughton, 2004. In your opinion are the views expressed by Neil DeMarco justified?

Extracts from this document...


The Second World War begun on the 3rd September 1939 and affected women massively. Not only did they have to go out to work in places like factories but they also had to do their traditional roles of cooking, cleaning and looking after the children. The women had to adopt new roles because the men were no longer there to do their jobs. In this piece of coursework I shall focus on how reliable the quote by Neil DeMarco is ("There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role."). In my opinion I think that this suggests that the women were in the home all the time. And I shall look at evidence supporting and disputing DeMarco's interpretation throughout this coursework. In some ways it could be reliable because women still had their traditional roles because the jobs they had were giving out tea or being a librarian but this quote may not be reliable because women were more free and many worked in either the factories, being part of the land girls or WRNS. I shall look at a variety of sources to support or dispute this interpretation , primary sources, like diary accounts and pictures or ,secondary sources, from historians like Carol Harris or Juliet Gardiner. I shall also look at films such as Land Girls, Hope and Glory and Charlotte Grey. I think that Neil DeMarco's interpretation will be quite reliable because many women did have traditional roles but others didn't. In this first section I shall explore the ways by which Neil DeMarco's interpretation is correct and the reliability of it. There is plenty to suggest that Neil DeMarco was correct and women didn't get away from their traditional roles in the home. For example, all women had to struggle with the introduction of rationing and also feeding their children on limited food. They had to used ration booklets with daily coupons as there was only one other way to feed their children. ...read more.


But the role of nursing was very important in the armed forces because they helped injured soldiers which is like the caring people that women are. If nurses weren't there then the men wouldn't have as much a reason to fight as it would bring six people out of the war effort instead of just one nurse to one injured man. One form of nursing was from the 'Army Nursing Corps', it was voluntary but was fully part of the army's nursing sector. A poster(2) shows a women looking very glamorous and showing that women should volunteer so this shows that Neil DeMarco's interpretation is correct in that they need to care for injured men. This source is reliable because the woman looks glamorous and womanly even in the army and shows DeMarco is correct but this was made by the government so it could have been censored. This could be useful because it was made at the time and encourages women to join into a very traditional role and therefore the attitude had not changed towards women however it was made by the government so it is biased and probably censored. However, there are other sources that suggest that Neil DeMarco was incorrect and in this next section I shall be looking at the ways that Neil DeMarco is incorrect in his interpretation. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that Neil DeMarco was incorrect and that women got away from their traditional roles in the workforce. Women who went into the workforce were in the factories as they needed to go into them because there were no men anymore to do their jobs. Source F3 shows that women needed to come into the war effort to bring out planes and encourages women to go into work. However, it is a poster to boost morale which could have been censored and also we don't know whether the women actually were going into the factories. ...read more.


This could be useful because it shows women away from their traditional roles and providing for the country however this is a film so it is not as useful to me. This is moderately useful. At home the sexual morals changed and 1 in 3 babies were born illegitimate. The divorce rate rose because of these new sexual morals. The mothers went into work because they needed to help the war effort even though women who had children weren't supposed to work. There was also a lot of dying in the war and more women had died at home than the soldiers in action. So, this shows that women were more respected, they were the defenders of the family and they had more rights to do what they wanted. To conclude, I think that in some ways Neil DeMarco is correct because some women had to go into the factories and were paid less than men, some women still agreed with the old sexual morals. Many women still had important roles at home, cooking, cleaning and providing a good home for children. However, I think that in other ways DeMarco is incorrect because women had non-traditional roles being part of the SOE, the Land Girls and other parts of the armed forces. I think that the roles of the SOE are shown well in the film Charlotte Gray and shows how life affected young women and also it is backed up because it actually happened to Violette Szabo (F10). So, I think that really Juliet Gardiner's interpretation is more reliable to Neil DeMarco's interpretation and the interpretations that were shown at the time because it shows the full picture of all of the women's roles in the Second World War and is a good conclusion because she wrote a whole book about women in the Second World War and is an academic book with a lot of references involved and that as a historian in this era she has more sources and has a benefit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Effect of Civilians in WW2

    This implies that it must have been heavy bombing and very frequent. This source is a first hand account so is reliable. It says that she lived in Birmingham. This is a big city, and not all placed would have been bombed like this.

  2. Gallic war

    it cost him his life when he was murdered in 43 on orders of Antony. First Triumvirate: aims, roles and responsibilities of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus * Scullard[Cd8]: "Its formation was a turning point in the history of the Free State, and it was ...

  1. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    of influence on what people thought, it seems as they would have been very against the suffragettes and their cause. It seems that Emmeline felt that as they were getting the public's attention they were making the government listen to them, and so getting their way.


    TOWARD A NEW FOREIGN POLICY CONSENSUS In such circumstances, it perhaps is not surprising that, in ways reminiscent of the period following World War I, the American people -- and many of our leaders in both parties -- seem to have become afflicted with a severe case of what I would call foreign policy ambivalence.

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    the voage in the middle passage and working as a slave, I was quite happy with everything we had and the way we were treated. I had six grandchildren by the end of the time we were staying in London.

  2. "Why did war on the Western Front last so long?"

    believe that General Haig thinks that Germany could be defeated within six months. Haig didn't actually know what was going on at the Western Front as he did not experience being there first hand. We do not know whether Germany could be defeated in six months is reliable because even Haig doesn't know that.

  1. The Changing Role and Status of Women Since 1945

    However, social stereotypes were promoted in all sorts of subtle and not-so-subtle ways, such as the Janet and John book in Source E and pieces of legislation which discriminated against women. For centuries, girls had been pushed into the traditional role of housewife and mother, and boys into their role of breadwinner and household handyman.

  2. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    There have been quite a few key turning points in the development of tanks. Tanks have become better with changes making which give them more versatility in the battle and make them more efficient. In 1939 tanks were given flame throwers and this was a key turning point because this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work