• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A study of British foreign policy in the 1920's suggests that British governments increasingly accepted the need for the treaty of Versailles to be amended in Germany's favour"How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A study of British foreign policy in the 1920's suggests that British governments increasingly accepted the need for the treaty of Versailles to be amended in Germany's favour" How far do you agree? To answer this question I need to review the terms of the treaty of Versailles and Britain's view on it. I will need to look at issues such as reparations, and how elements such as the Dawes plan of 1924, the Young plan of 1929 and Germany's ability to pay the given amounts of reparations, addresses in many summit conferences, affected Britain's outlook on the treaty. The First World War had a great effect on Britain and Germany, how the treaty was enforced in Germany and public opinion in both countries in the 1920's. I think the main reason Britain wanted to amend the terms of the treaty of Versailles was because they wanted to see an economically strong Germany again, as they were once strong trading partners, and so this would have been to the advantage of British economy also As a whole Britain seemed to have gained what she wanted from the treaty. German naval power had been destroyed and this had been one of Britain's main concerns. The British believed that the treaty was firm but just at first, though this was not the prevailing view in Germany. ...read more.

Middle

Like Wilson, Lloyd George thought that Germany should pay what she could afford, Germany was always a strong trading partner with Britain and so he didn't want to see the country completely economically disabled. Overall the reparations issue was a major cause of division between the Big 3 (USA, Britain and France). In the end astronomical reparation figures were being suggested and so Lloyd Gorge suggested that a reparation commission should be set up, to determine the amount that should e paid. In 1921 this commission finally recommended a sum of �6.6 million. Altogether from the treaty, Britain wanted, to regain its naval supremacy in Europe, expand its empire, block the spread of communism from Russia to Germany etc, decide on a reparations amount and hoped for peace and reconciliation between the powers. Also under the treaty of Versailles, a League of Nations was set up, to include all the major powers, although Germany and Russia were not allowed to enter. In the 1920's foreign relations were dominated by reparation and security. Britain was particularly worried about the fact that Germany was denied self-determination and the amount f reparations they had to pay. 23 conferences were held during 1920-1922, where British representatives argued with the French to relax some provisions of the treaty. This shows a main area where Britain did actually try to amend the treaty in German favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

The pact improved the international atmosphere of the late 1920's.Britain and Italy acted as guarantors, ensuring that all parties kept to the agreements. Although Stresemann was a hard-headed German nationalist and determined to dismantle the Versailles settlement, he saw the advantage of collaboration with the western powers and was prepared to work with Chamberlain and Braid through the League of Nations. Also in 1928 all the major powers signed the Kellog-Braid pact, outlawing war. In 1929 the Young Plan extended the period of reparations payments by 60 years, thus further easing the burden on Germany. Britain and France agreed to end their occupation of the Rhineland five years early, in 1930. In conclusion I find that I do agree with the previous statement as there is a lot of evidence that points to Britain developing their policy of appeasement through the 1920's and trying to mend the treaty in Germany's favour, including the Dawes plan, which made the first links between the amount of reparations Germany had to pay and their actual ability to pay, the Locarno treaty, which improved Franco-German relations by agreeing that the Rhineand should be demilitarised and guaranteed German frontiers in the West, and the Young plan, that helped Germany by reducing their reparation payments and also evacuated allied troops from the Rhineland, etc. most importantly it would be Britain's best interests to re-evaluate the treaty as they needed Germany to become economically strong again so that they could go back to being strong trading partners. ?? ?? ?? ?? Laura Rea 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Readers found it boring, poorly written, and difficult to read. In his prison experience, Hitler learned one valuable lesson. This was if he hoped to gain power, he would have to obtain it through legal means. After being released from prison, it was at first difficult for Hitler to pick up from where he left off.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The League of Nations divided the region along these lines but it built in safe guards to prevent future disputes. Both countries accepted the decision. This was important, as the League of Nations had to recover from their bad start in Vilna.

  1. How Far Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair?

    to be increasing with all the compensation and Germany's power weakening - the Prime Minister feared France becoming the dominating force in Europe. George may have demonstrated a slight sense of sympathy for the Germans in attempt to implicate his deprecation of the amount of compensation going through to France; because he felt they were becoming too powerful etc.

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    I even think that the way the League of Nations was set up was unfair to Germany because it was meant to be for all countries so arguments could be stopped but the Germans were not even allowed to enter.

  1. How far did Bismarckachieve his foreign policy aims in 1870-1878?

    time as preventing a war breaking out between Austria-Hungary and Russia; and therefore the Balkan threat was greatly reduced. However, following the Congress of Berlin in 1878, Austria-Hungary and Russia felt that they were not being supported enough because during the distribution of the Balkan states, Russia was only given

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    Greece had no idea who the murderers were and soon after; Mussolini bombarded and took control of the Greek Island of Corfu. Greece appealed to the League for help. The league quickly condemned Mussolini's action and ordered Greece pay compensation but that the money is held by the league until the killers could be found.

  1. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    Instead of moving away or asking for apologies, France appealed to other powers to help them in case of a German attack. The result was Russia and Britain standing on the side of France and protesting to Berlin because of the 'war in sight'.

  2. WHY WAS GERMANY SO DISCONTENTED WITH THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    of where the Germans and Austrians regarded each other as one nationality and according to Wilson's National Self-Determination pledge, should be allowed to merge as one. The loss of German territory was severe hit to them. The Germans hated the fact they were now divided from East Prussia by the Polish Corridor and had lost an import port (Danzig)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work