• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

Extracts from this document...


Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations. In order to ascertain what the successes and failures of the League of Nations were, and account for them, I intend both to look at the structure of the League of Nations and to look toward the involvement of the League of Nations in World events and discuss what the successes and failures were. On the eighth of January 1918, the President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson, in his message on the Conditions of Peace given at a joint session of the two houses of the American Congress, identified the "fourteen points" intended to serve as the basis for World peace. He stated in his fourteenth point that "a general association of nations should be formed on the basis of covenants designed to create mutual guarantees of the political independence and territorial integrity of States, large and small equally."1 As a consequence, the Paris Peace Conference (January 18th 1919 - January 16th 1920) accepted the proposals for the creation of a League of Nations. On January the 27th, a committee was elected to draught a Covenant. By April the 18th, the Peace Conference unanimously adopted the draft Covenant on the motion of President Wilson. The Covenant consisted of 26 articles which the "contracting parties"2 agreed to, in "order to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security"3. ...read more.


It guaranteed the security of Albania in 1921 and rescued Austria from economic disaster. Other Disputes involved Bolivia and Paraguay, Peru and Columbia, and are all issues reflecting the successful aspects of the activities of the League. Although the idea of the League was an excellent and noble idea, it was fatally flawed from the onset by the non participation of the United States. The League could only be "as strong as those countries willing to support it".13 Other key failures include the Disarmament Commission, whose committee made no progress in persuading the member states to reduce armaments, though all had agreed to do so when they agreed to the covenant of the League of Nations. "The failure of disarmament was a great blow to the leagues prestige"14 Both Poland and Lithuania had rival claims to Vilna. The League of Nations was over ruled by the Conference of Ambassadors in Paris which was formed to deal with problems arising out of the Versailles Treaty. During a boundary dispute between Greece and Albania, an Italian General was sent to investigate and he was shot in Greece. The reasons for the shooting were never clear, but Mussolini immediately ordered the shelling of Corfu, a Greek island and demanded heavy compensation. The League offered a solution, but the Conference of Ambassadors rejected it and rewrote one in favour of Italy upon heavy pressure from Italy and Mussolini. ...read more.


They did not want to drive him into an alliance with Hitler. Mussolini was irritated by the sanctions anyway and began to move closer to Hitler; small states lost faith in the League; and Hitler himself was convinced to break the Versailles Treaty. After 1935, the League was not taken seriously again. Faced by threats to international peace from all sides - the Spanish civil war, Japan's resumption of war against China (1937), and finally the appeasement of Hitler at Munich (1938) - the League collapsed. The International Labour Organisation continued to function and eventually became affiliated with the United Nations, but in 1946 the League dissolved itself, its services and real estate were relocated to the United Nations. I believe that, overall, the League of Nations was neither a complete success nor a complete failure. Predominantly, I think it can be considered a failure due to the fact that it was "only as strong as those countries willing to support it"16. But its successes such as it's extended considerable aid to refugees; its help to suppress white slave and opium traffic; its pioneering work in surveys of health; its extended financial aid to needy states; and its broadening of international cooperation in labour relations and many other fields were so important at the time and were undeniably a starting point for the foundation of the United Nations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    In such an incident like Italy's conquest of Abyssinia, perhaps the League's capabilities were restricted by the fear of pressing Mussolini into allying with Hitler. This may have reduced the power and ability of the League, thus it is not completely justifiable to deem the League powerless.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This happened. Germany could not afford battleships in the aftermath of the war and most navies were now moving to smaller (by degrees), faster ships that could also carry weapons that carried a punch - such as cruisers. Aircraft carriers were also being developed with greater commitment.

  1. The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles in Addressing the Causes of ...

    On the other hand, the League was not successful in stopping conflict altogether. For example, despite the League's efforts, they could not stop Poland from annexing Vilna or Italy from occupying Corfu in 1923. And it was difficult for the permanent members of the League to put aside their self

  2. Did the successes of the Vienna settlement ou tweigh its failures?

    France was the main issue of the Congress. Ensuring France was unable to reinvade Europe was the key issue from which all the others branched. Despite losing the war, France was allowed to take part in the settlement negotiations. This meant that, unlike in Versailles a century later, the losing side would have less reason to feel wronged.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  2. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    One of the most undermining events of the crisis was the Hoare-Laval Pact; both British and French foreign ministers had created a plan which they believed would end the fighting. This involved dividing Abyssinia and giving the best areas of land to Italy and the rocky, mountainous areas to Abyssinia,

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    This was to dismay of the French. Britain did not consult its allies not the League about this decision, however Britain wasn't actually breaking the Treaty of Versailles. It seems that each country was looking after its own and ignoring the league.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    side when this happened for the murder and demanded that the government of Greece pay compensation and execute the murderers. But the Greeks had no clue who the murderers were, so they couldn?t execute them. Italy got impatient and bombed the Greek island of Corfu then occupied it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work