• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

After World War one, the founders of the league wished for a New World of peace and an improvement in the quality of peoples live. To what extent did the League of Nations achieve this in the 1920’s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE HISTORY COUSEWORK. THE LEAUGE OF NATIONS IN THE 1920's. After World War one, the founders of the league wished for a New World of peace and an improvement in the quality of peoples live. To what extent did the League of Nations achieve this in the 1920's. In this essay I am going to talk about the aims, successes and failures of the League of Nations during the 1920's. The League of Nations set out to improve many things around the world. The major reason for the League was to solve disputes between nations without it ending in war. The League also wanted to improve conditions in the working place. ...read more.

Middle

After this in1925 the League stopped Greece and Bulgaria fighting with success. Later Bulgaria were found to be the provoked and Greece had to pay compensation. The League of Nations was also involved in a lot of humanitarian successes. These areas of successes came in improving the lives of ordinary people around the world. They included improving working conditions; here they made a minimum 48-hour week, all workers to be able to join a trade union and only over fifteens to have a full time job. The League tackled slavery, gunrunning and drug trafficking. They also wanted to promote the rights of minatory groups. The World Health Organization enjoyed successes in combating diseases. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mussolini went behind the Leagues back and went to the conference of ambassadors (a group outside the League) who went along with him so Greece had to pay compensation. In this essay I have looked at many factors to the League of Nations. I looked at the aims, successes and failures. The aims, which were set by the League, were much achieved and the successes were reasonable but were all involved small countries. On thee humanitarian front the League did a lot and gained respect through this. The failures were very considerable in that they involved powers, which the League of Nations could not handle. My conclusion to the League of Nations is that it was failure and simply could not handle the large countries, which I believe is essential to any venture of this sort. ?? ?? ?? ?? Joseph Swainson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    Another time when the leagues strength's were shown was in the Aaland Islands that belonged to Finland but wanted to be ruled by Sweden. The league decided that Finland should have them, but that no weapons were to be kept there.

  2. History essay why did world war one happen

    By 1914, the main concern of the emperor of Austria-Hungary was how to keep its very unstable empire together and after WWI it had lost all of its empire However all these tensions needed a spark to make them all lead to a great war and not just rumbling tensions with small localised incidents.

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    No one was taking the disarmament anyway, however nothing else was proposed. Britain and France were divided on the issue, which didn't help. By 1933 many British believed the Treaty of Versailles. In fact, the British singed an agreement to allow the Germans to ream if the navy stayed under 35 per cent of the British.

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    France was a key member of the League, which made this event seem somewhat hypocritical of the League since France, a member of the League, was clearly breaking rules within the Covenant of the League. Another event which led to even greater criticisms of the League occurred between 1935-1936 when

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    It is possible that Athens is already enforcing her authority upon her allies at this early stage in the development of the league. Athens also had great power as leader. An oath sworn by all members of the league indicated that Athens would hold the place of leadership and authority for as long as the league was established.

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    In the 1930's there was increased pressure to do something about disarmament. The Germans especially had long been angry that they had been forced to disarm after the First World War while other nations had not done the same. Many countries were actually spending more on their armaments than before the First World War.

  1. The League of Nations

    Another problem for the League however, was that it was being too closely linked to the victors of the First World War and the Peace Treaties. Another reason why the league failed was that because one their aims, 'To keep collective security...'

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    And so, the Protocol, instead of strengthening the League, weakened it.Following this event was the League?s prevention of war in between Greece and Bulgaria in October 1925. Greek troops had invaded Bulgaria after an incident on the border in which some Greek soldiers had been killed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work