• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'An unmitigated failure' how far is this a fair estimate of the League of Nations

Extracts from this document...


'An unmitigated failure' how far is this a fair estimate of the League of Nations The League of Nations was an organization that kept peace and settled wars and conflicts in Europe. It was formed after WW1 to prevent another war after the bloodshed that took place in World War 1. Many Europeans countries were in this organization, but the main question is whether this was a total failure or not. Speaking just, this sentence is correct although the League of Nations had strengths there was time when it didn't prevent many wars and conflicts, this later caused it to collapse, which proved it was 'an unmitigated failure'. Talking in real terms this is a fair estimate about the League of Nations, because in the end it did turn out to be a failure whether it was or was not in the earlier stages. The main weakness about the League of Nations was that it did not have the biggest power, and that was the US. At that time the US was world No 1 and without this the League of Nations was nothing. ...read more.


let her do what she wants to" This shows the reasons why the League of Nations did not want to stop Japan as if they did. They would stop the trading and the letter from the master of penthouse shows how much he encourages Britain not to stop them. In the end, the master of penthouse got his wish but this proved that he league of nations were helpless and couldn't do anything at all. The invasion on Abyssinia by Italy was done purposely to see whether the League of Nations could stop this fighting or whether they were helpless, it proved that they were helpless and just watched everything happening. One reason to this was that they did not have enough powers to stop this sanction. Some evidence to support is the speech Mussolini gave in 2 October 1935 "Instead of recognizing the just rights of Italy, the League of Nations dares to speak of sanctions. Until proof to the contrary, I refuse to believe that the free people of Britain want to spill blood and push Europe on the road to catastrophe in order to defend an African country, universally stamped as unworthy of taking its place among civilized people". ...read more.


Such as the war were the Greek attacked Bulgaria in 1925, the league stopped this war and said Greece would pay for the damage and Greece did so. The conflict over the Aaland Islands between Sweden and Finland ended and Finland was given the land while Sweden excepted this fact. There were also many more conferences and early disputes solved but unfortunately this didn't last for long when it came to bigger powers such as Germany, Italy and Japan. In 1920 The league Overall, the League of Nations turned out to be an absolute failure especially in the end. However, I have to admit that if it had an army and the US in its sides, it could have prevented World War 2. So it was good but lacked many things. Another part is that the League of Nations should have taken at least some actions when the Poland was attacked, or when Italy invaded Abyssinia, or japans attack on china. The League of Nations in the end collapsed and the US took its place and the US was the one who solved all the conflicts later. Manasvi Pindolia ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    Many countries also rejected disarmament treaties (Britain being first) as they felt like they would be tied to defending other countries. The League also made it hard to discuss disarmament and it took them five years to agree on a 'draft convention.'

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Territorial The following land was taken away from Germany : Alsace-Lorraine (given to France) Eupen and Malmedy (given to Belgium) Northern Schleswig (given to Denmark) Hultschin (given to Czechoslovakia) West Prussia, Posen and Upper Silesia (given to Poland) The Saar, Danzig and Memel were put under the control of the

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    It's democratic approach meant that it took a long time to reach a decision and often a decision would not be reached until it was pointless. Also some decisions made by the League had to be unanimous and this took an especially long time as members often disagreed with each other.

  2. Was the League of Nations a Success or Failure?

    It softened the trouble of war reparations, stabilised the currency. However, it made the German economy rely on foreign economies, and the Great Depression would damage Germany. The Corfu Incident in 1923, the border between Italy and Albania was far from clear and the Treaty of Versailles had never really addressed this issue.


    It proved that Athens showed no intentions of allowing the states to leave the alliance, or more specifically, to escape her leadership. This was also the first time in which Athens had used the power of League against a member state in private conflict.

  2. The League of Nations

    Woodrow Wilson had good intentions and put a lot of effort into them when he proposed the League of Nations. However, his efforts drew short and the League was destined for failure. In my opinion, it needed all of the world powers in order for it to have been successful,

  1. "The main reason for the failure of the League of Nations was that the ...

    By 1935, most countries did not think that the League could keep the peace. When Hitler began to break the Treaty of Versailles in the 1930s, the League was powerless to stop him (this is the next topic you will study).

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    The big question going around was whether everyone else should disarm to the level Germany had been forced to, or whether the Germans should be allowed to rearm to a level closer to everyone else. The experience of the 1920s showed that the former was not going to work, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work