• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analsysis of two sources on the Reichstag Fire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Assignment B Answers 1) Sources A and B support each other to an extent. Source A suggests van der Lubbe and a few other communists were responsible for starting the Reichstag fire and starting several other smaller fires elsewhere in Berlin. However in source B van der Lubbe admits that only he was responsible for planning to set the Reichstag on fire; Van der Lubbe said 'I can only repeat that I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself.' This shows that source B does support some points portrayed in source A. However, when Rudolf Diels interviewed van der Lubbe in source A, Lubbe made Diels believe that he could have acted on his own, 'The voluntary confessions of van der Lubbe made me believe he had acted alone.' Also Diels thought that starting a fire was an easy job, he said that 'he could have easily set fire to the old furniture, the heavy curtains, and the bone dry, wooden panels.' ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe may have been tortured into saying what the Nazi Party wanted because by saying that a communist/s started the fire, Hitler would have an excuse to arrest many of his political opponents (using the decree for the protection of people and state.) Both sources are very convenient towards the Nazis and are suited to what the audience want to hear- Source A was to be suited to the judges at the Nuremberg Trials of 1945-47 and Source B was to fulfil what the Nazis wanted to hear and do. Therefore, both sources may be inaccurate and therefore not very reliable. 2. When Diels wrote his account, it was well after World War II- This may mean that the source is inaccurate. Straight after the war had ended another one started; this one was called the Cold War or 'the War of Words'. USA, Britain and France were fighting against the communist (USSR). ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, there are some major concerns when using this account as a primary source. These concerns are due to the content and motive for writing the account. One of the major problems with the account is when it was written- a full 12 years after the events occurred. Although the burning of the Reichstag may be hard to forget, there is no way that Diels could remember everything that happened in the source, especially in such detail. Diels gives hugely complicated quotations, such as G�ring shouting; 'There will be no mercy now. Anyone who stands in our way will be cut down. Every communist will be shot or hanged. Everybody supporting the communists must be arrested.' This quote could not have so accurately remembered from such a long time ago, it is probably made up, making the account even more unreliable and inaccurate. As a result, the point of view of the account Diels put himself into may not represent of what he truly believes. Clearly, Source A is not a very reliable source due to the circumstances Rudolf Diels was in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Diels also tried to take the edge off some of the Nazis bad name. Question 3: Source C is a piece of primary evidence from a British magazine showing Hindenburg talking to Hitler. Hindenburg is giving Hitler the chance to arrest any communists he wishes.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Van der Lubbe was a Communist, but that does not necessarily mean that it was a plot by a group of them, which was the complete opposite to the quote in s Source B which states Van der Lubbe was solitary when setting fire to the building.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    This decree that Hindenburg is handing to Hitler in the cartoon is the 'Decree for the Protection of the People and the State' issued on February 28th that allowed Hitler amongst other things to arrest leading Communists. In that respect, the Reichstag fire was of great advantage to Hitler in his run for power.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Rudolf Diels was G�ring's prot�g�. Therefore, he'd try to protect G�ring so that G�ring could protect him back. His account did not criticize G�ring much. It only said, "G�ring then shouted out the order to me: 'Police on an emergency footing; shoot to kill.'"

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    All of the accusations involving Marinus Van Der Lubbe also rely very heavily on Diels own fragile opinions, none of which are reinforced by facts and actual evidence form the time of the incident. An example of one of these indictments is when Diels states that 'He had been so

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    Hitler was so determined that the Nazi's were anything but a mad house. So this may be why the document was released in 1950. Also, it was after the World War - there were no longer any Nazis and the communists were in a minority.

  1. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    Hitler made promises workers jobs and employees were promised restored profits, farmers higher prices; shopkeepers protection against competition. There was something for everybody. Other parties were very weak and they underestimated the Nazis. Also Hitler was seen as a hero.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    This, again, could be a result of Van der Lubbe covering up the other Communists from the Nazis. In conclusion, Source A is supported by source B by the fact that Van der Lubbe confessed and that he acted alone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work