• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analsysis of two sources on the Reichstag Fire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Assignment B Answers 1) Sources A and B support each other to an extent. Source A suggests van der Lubbe and a few other communists were responsible for starting the Reichstag fire and starting several other smaller fires elsewhere in Berlin. However in source B van der Lubbe admits that only he was responsible for planning to set the Reichstag on fire; Van der Lubbe said 'I can only repeat that I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself.' This shows that source B does support some points portrayed in source A. However, when Rudolf Diels interviewed van der Lubbe in source A, Lubbe made Diels believe that he could have acted on his own, 'The voluntary confessions of van der Lubbe made me believe he had acted alone.' Also Diels thought that starting a fire was an easy job, he said that 'he could have easily set fire to the old furniture, the heavy curtains, and the bone dry, wooden panels.' ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe may have been tortured into saying what the Nazi Party wanted because by saying that a communist/s started the fire, Hitler would have an excuse to arrest many of his political opponents (using the decree for the protection of people and state.) Both sources are very convenient towards the Nazis and are suited to what the audience want to hear- Source A was to be suited to the judges at the Nuremberg Trials of 1945-47 and Source B was to fulfil what the Nazis wanted to hear and do. Therefore, both sources may be inaccurate and therefore not very reliable. 2. When Diels wrote his account, it was well after World War II- This may mean that the source is inaccurate. Straight after the war had ended another one started; this one was called the Cold War or 'the War of Words'. USA, Britain and France were fighting against the communist (USSR). ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, there are some major concerns when using this account as a primary source. These concerns are due to the content and motive for writing the account. One of the major problems with the account is when it was written- a full 12 years after the events occurred. Although the burning of the Reichstag may be hard to forget, there is no way that Diels could remember everything that happened in the source, especially in such detail. Diels gives hugely complicated quotations, such as G�ring shouting; 'There will be no mercy now. Anyone who stands in our way will be cut down. Every communist will be shot or hanged. Everybody supporting the communists must be arrested.' This quote could not have so accurately remembered from such a long time ago, it is probably made up, making the account even more unreliable and inaccurate. As a result, the point of view of the account Diels put himself into may not represent of what he truly believes. Clearly, Source A is not a very reliable source due to the circumstances Rudolf Diels was in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Communist, and as the Communists were one of his main rivals in the elections he could use the fire as propaganda for the Nazis in proving that the Communists were no good. The togas that the two men are wearing in this image could be taken to mean different things.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Van der Lubbe was a Communist, but that does not necessarily mean that it was a plot by a group of them, which was the complete opposite to the quote in s Source B which states Van der Lubbe was solitary when setting fire to the building.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Obviously, Diels won't be trusted for what he wrote. But, if Diels tried to be anti-Nazi, he would be mistrusted as well. As a result, the point of view of the account Diels put himself into may not represent of what he truly believes.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    busy he had started several dozen fires in different places in the Reichstag'. There were no eyewitnesses, forensic evidence or any other confirmation of this occurring. Diels has based his opinion on his own, unsubstantiated views and ignored any proof that existed at the time.

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    Study sources C and D. How far do sources C and D agree about the events surrounding the Reichstag fire? Explain your answer. Both the sources C and D reflect the view that the Nazis where taking advantage of the Reichstag Fire.

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    Question 2 The Nazis was successful but they weren't popular they hadn't gotten more than 50 seats in the Reichstag election; in July 1932 they proceeded to peak, then they decreased in November. Although the Nazis didn't have as much people voting for them, than against them, they did have one third of all the votes' cats in 1932.

  1. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    He was the Head of the Prussian political police which meant that he had a great responsibility with this job and he would not have mentioned anything bad about his Nazi's officials, including not confessing, if that was the case, that the Nazis have started the fire.

  2. Why did the Nazis set fire to the Reichstag

    And with the communist out of the way Hitler can now take control of the government and have more significant advantages in the forth coming election. And the first thing the Nazis did was to outlaw the KPD which gave them a majority without the support of the DNVP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work