• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

Extracts from this document...


The British and French troops were forced into retreat towards the Channel port of Dunkirk by the Germans attack. The only hope for the Allies was to evacuate the troops before Dunkirk fell into the hands of the Germans. Therefore the British launched operation Dynamo. Between 27 May and 4 June, as the German air force pounded the beaches, the Royal Navy evacuated men back to England. Source A, B, C, D, E, F, G and I inform us about the evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 in various forms ways. All the sources have either one of the 2 themes, success or failure. Some sources agree with the question that the evacuation from Dunkirk in World War Two was a great disaster for Britain while other sources disagree and say that it was a success. This essay will investigate how the sources interpret the evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 Sources A, B, D have similar themes in that they disagree with the statement and believe that the evacuation of Dunkirk was a success. They are British sources and so would believe that the evacuation was a success rather than a failure. Source A is Winston Churchill's speech to the House of Commons on the 4th June 1940, following the Evacuation of Dunkirk. In the statement, Churchill explains that evacuation of Dunkirk was a miracle of deliverance and that wars are not won by evacuations. ...read more.


There are also navy vessels out in the sea. As Cundall is an official war artist, he would have been appointed by the government, so you are not sure whether this was painted for propaganda purposes or that this was what Cundall had seen. As presumably he should have been there at the time, but we are not sure. If Cundall was not there, then Cundall may have had no choice but to portray Dunkirk as a success because the government would have given information that would be positive. In the painting the evacuation seems to be portrayed better than it actually is and that it was not a failure. Therefore this source does link in with source A, in that you get the sense of a moral victory which was supported by Winston Churchill view in source A. A 'miracle of deliverance' which both sources have and also turning defeat through to victory by the means of propaganda. In some ways source I is limited as the painting could be portrayed to boost-morale and show the unity of Dunkirk, the Dunkirk Spirit. It is heroic, being evacuated under fire, thus creating a particular image. From our own knowledge we can say the source is useful because we know around 350,000 men were evacuated and clearly in the painting there are vast amount of troops being evacuated. ...read more.


If rifles were left behind you get the feeling anything heavier or bigger was left behind too. However the source is limited because this shows only one aspect and show the troops evacuating or what sort of ships were used by the British to evacuate the troops. Overall the source is reliable because it was not for publication, not from the government and so not for propaganda either. There was to perspective for the photo, just another person who owned a camera taking a photo. Whereas in source E, Horrock was there at the time so it is a primary source however he wrote it around 20 years after Dunkirk so his memory have been distorted or his emotions have taken over his writing. He was also writing in hindsight and he knew what happened at the end as well, which may have changed the way he thought during the time. He was a Brigadier and so was in charge of many soldiers, so he must have some authority. The source is useful because it shows that troops were ashamed and exhausted, it was a complete shambles, they made a mess and shows that they were not organised. However it is limited because he was writing it 20 years after the event itself and therefore he may have changed the way he thought about Dunkirk. Overall this source is reliable. The source is useful to us because there is a lot of information and the source agrees with the question. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Dunkirk is described as a deserted landscape. These photos emphasize how defeated the B.E.F really were. It mentions the people killed in air raids and equipment such as trucks simply sitting on the beaches like litter. This portrayed the image that many soldiers recalled afterwards. There was no spirit in these scenes, and soldiers' lying dead on

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The book was written in 1957 so it is secondary evidence, which means that the book is not produced as part of propagandas scheme. A German fighter pilot's account of Dunkirk, this source tells us that Dunkirk was "Cold blooded killing" this suggests that many people had died.

  1. Dunkirk. Source A is a modern painting by war artist Charles Cundall after the ...

    The weather was also a big factor in the evacuation because if the weather was bad it would have made it extremely difficult to rescue the soldiers. Within the picture bombs are shown on one side but not the other, as not all the sky is black and it shows

  2. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    May 1940 to inform people of Britain that 'one of the most magnificent operations in history' is occurring. The bold main heading 'Tens of thousands safely home already' gives the reader a positive attitude about this operation. By using the word 'already' exaggerates on how fast paced this operation is

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    In the last four days of the evacuation, the small boats returned a miraculous 26,000 men to Britain. The beaches were a lethal environment, miles and miles of open ground with few sand dunes to take cover from Luftwaffe attacks.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    book is only to inform so lots of different attitudes could be shown. Source E is an interview with a parent in May 1940. The interview is an extract from a mass observation survey. The source shows a parent from the Southend disagreeing with the idea of evacuating his seven-year-old son.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    the fact that Britain and the French were allies yet the photograph shows the reality of the situation, this makes it very reliable. On the other hand however it can also be criticised that the Frenchman was angry that the British soldiers left them abandoned, so they held a ?grudge? and took this photograph in vein.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It also informed people that the ?miracle? was not a miracle at all. However, this source is limited in its usefulness as the event was recalled twenty-two years later; this may have resulted in slight exaggeration and memory loss. Also, it is one person?s view of the events that occurred which makes it less reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work