• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

Extracts from this document...


The British and French troops were forced into retreat towards the Channel port of Dunkirk by the Germans attack. The only hope for the Allies was to evacuate the troops before Dunkirk fell into the hands of the Germans. Therefore the British launched operation Dynamo. Between 27 May and 4 June, as the German air force pounded the beaches, the Royal Navy evacuated men back to England. Source A, B, C, D, E, F, G and I inform us about the evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 in various forms ways. All the sources have either one of the 2 themes, success or failure. Some sources agree with the question that the evacuation from Dunkirk in World War Two was a great disaster for Britain while other sources disagree and say that it was a success. This essay will investigate how the sources interpret the evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 Sources A, B, D have similar themes in that they disagree with the statement and believe that the evacuation of Dunkirk was a success. They are British sources and so would believe that the evacuation was a success rather than a failure. Source A is Winston Churchill's speech to the House of Commons on the 4th June 1940, following the Evacuation of Dunkirk. In the statement, Churchill explains that evacuation of Dunkirk was a miracle of deliverance and that wars are not won by evacuations. ...read more.


There are also navy vessels out in the sea. As Cundall is an official war artist, he would have been appointed by the government, so you are not sure whether this was painted for propaganda purposes or that this was what Cundall had seen. As presumably he should have been there at the time, but we are not sure. If Cundall was not there, then Cundall may have had no choice but to portray Dunkirk as a success because the government would have given information that would be positive. In the painting the evacuation seems to be portrayed better than it actually is and that it was not a failure. Therefore this source does link in with source A, in that you get the sense of a moral victory which was supported by Winston Churchill view in source A. A 'miracle of deliverance' which both sources have and also turning defeat through to victory by the means of propaganda. In some ways source I is limited as the painting could be portrayed to boost-morale and show the unity of Dunkirk, the Dunkirk Spirit. It is heroic, being evacuated under fire, thus creating a particular image. From our own knowledge we can say the source is useful because we know around 350,000 men were evacuated and clearly in the painting there are vast amount of troops being evacuated. ...read more.


If rifles were left behind you get the feeling anything heavier or bigger was left behind too. However the source is limited because this shows only one aspect and show the troops evacuating or what sort of ships were used by the British to evacuate the troops. Overall the source is reliable because it was not for publication, not from the government and so not for propaganda either. There was to perspective for the photo, just another person who owned a camera taking a photo. Whereas in source E, Horrock was there at the time so it is a primary source however he wrote it around 20 years after Dunkirk so his memory have been distorted or his emotions have taken over his writing. He was also writing in hindsight and he knew what happened at the end as well, which may have changed the way he thought during the time. He was a Brigadier and so was in charge of many soldiers, so he must have some authority. The source is useful because it shows that troops were ashamed and exhausted, it was a complete shambles, they made a mess and shows that they were not organised. However it is limited because he was writing it 20 years after the event itself and therefore he may have changed the way he thought about Dunkirk. Overall this source is reliable. The source is useful to us because there is a lot of information and the source agrees with the question. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The Prime Minister being panicked shows the true chaos that was Dunkirk. The source is reliable as it is a primary source written from Churchill to his General so it wouldn't be censored and Churchill wouldn't lie as his General would need to know the true situation.

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    the people but remembering to deliver a positive attitude about the evacuation to avoid panic. After hearing the 'miraculous' results of the 'successful' evacuation the morale of the British people at home was really boosted and they were starting to become more optimistic.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    their life and this is why they are fighting over the boats. This source is written by a British Private so he would be biased, but it seems that he is quite negative about the Allied troops. This source is an eyewitness account, therefore it is first hand and it is primary evidence.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The book was written in 1957 so it is secondary evidence, which means that the book is not produced as part of propagandas scheme. A German fighter pilot's account of Dunkirk, this source tells us that Dunkirk was "Cold blooded killing" this suggests that many people had died.

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    British behaviour towards the French was also despicable considering French soldiers were holding the perimeter around Dunkirk. Lord Gort the Commander in Chief of the BEF was instructed not to inform his French colleagues that the evacuation was beginning south east of Dunkirk.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    A morale victory relates to maintaining a high spirit during the evacuation of the armed forces and the British public. A military victory is the amount of machinery saved. Morale in the public domain was boosted by the use of propaganda.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    The validity of this source is very weak as it contradicts the interpretation of Dunkirk being a triumph; it shows abandoned tanks and dead bodies. The validity of this source is debateable this is because on the one hand the photographer who is a Frenchman is not biased, due to

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    a fight.? From this quote we can infer that the scenes weren?t chaotic, the soldiers were gutless and weak. The bombings weren?t as bad as they were made out to be. This source was created to show people the reality of what actually happened at Dunkirk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work