• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyze the part played by the failure of Tsardom in the Feb/March revolution in 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Essay Analyze the part played by the failure of Tsardom in the Feb/March revolution in 1917. Maybe it was fated for Russia to become a democracy or a socialist state; for all signs pointed towards an empty throne. Tsardom, in Russia, had proved successful in the past as the Tsar carefully managed his power and, at least in the Golden years of the Tsarist era, somewhat appeased or completely suppressed the people. And the people did not expect much more in that the Tsar did not offer much more. As long as they stayed out of his pursuits, they lived to see the sun rise the next day (instead of seeing a firing squad taking aim at them). But it was the evident weakness that the people saw in Tsar Nicholas II, and the manifest repercussions that rippled forcefully throughout the economic and social sectors of Russian life, that made the Imperial Throne no more than a threat to the people and the Crown: no more than a symbol of power, wantonly used because of insecurity. ...read more.

Middle

If one could sum up the entire public opinion of Russia at that time in one word: it would be dissatisfaction. There was dissatisfaction in almost all aspects of the Russian community: the military, workers and peasants. The feudal framework had been abolished by Tsar Alexander II, in which serfs were tied to their land and were answerable to feudal lords. Ironically enough, he replaced the feudal lords with land captains and communes. And the serfs were not happy: they had been taken out of the frying pan and thrown in the fire. This found its climax, until 1917, in the 1905 Revolution, which was quickly suppressed. Now, under Tsar Nicholas, their resentment was beginning to show again: they expected change, they got now. The military was equally distressed. They were forced to fight in the Great War and suffered heavy losses. There were not enough guns for every soldier and a soldier had to depend on the death of his colleague for a gun to fight with. ...read more.

Conclusion

When he failed to, the revolutionaries could make their promises, (the socialists could promote their ideology as a better alternative), and offer a better future. And the millions of peasants and workers that supported them later proved to be their biggest asset; and the Tsar biggest loss. The fragility of Tsardom under Tsar Nicholas II was proven through the quick disintegration of the Throne. He was so weak in personality that he himself abdicated his crown. Revolutionaries, from then on, had to assume the role that the Tsar played in a more democratic fashion: and this was almost blindly accepted. The Revolution occurred could end as quickly as it started. One can conclude that the Tsar left the throne dishonored not only in that he abdicated himself but in that he was the key factor that placed upon the throne leaders who were driven by ruthlessness3: he took Russia with it when he fell. 1 The 1917 February/March Revolution. 2 There was a sudden growth of revolutionary parties/groups consisting of two main powers: the Social Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats. 3 Lenin and Stalin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    'Any defeat on the battlefield would result in a surge of opposition to the Government, which would be blamed for all Russia's failing and backwardness. Complete social revolution would be the probable outcome.' As Durnovo comments earlier Russia was in no fit state to fight and win comfortably.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    For the rest of the year, strikes, demonstrations, petitions, peasant uprisings, student riots and assassinations became rather common in Russia. On 4th February, the Tsar's uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated in Moscow. In June, sailors of the battleship Potemkin mutinied.

  1. Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

    In the end people got fed up with the ruling of the Tsar, so in March when the weather started to get warmer people took to the streets and demonstrated. It all started on March the 8th 1917 at a food queue when people started a demonstration.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Could the circumstances been any worse? Russia was now economically and socially trashed. Military status in 1915 was disastrous; it was so serious that Nicholas had to leave Petrograd to lead the army himself. The Tsar appointed himself as commander chief and became associated with military failure- what more to

  1. History Essay: Why was the March 1917 revolution successful?

    Meanwhile, the Tzar decided to write a manufactory. It consisted in: the oppression and destruction towards the soviets. In addition, the Tzar brought many soldiers that were in the war against Japan to crash any revolution that occurred. A very important point in the manufactory was the authorization of the

  2. Russia's involvement in WW1 was the main reason for the March 1917 revolution - ...

    There were some peasants who worked for the wealthy receiving a small wage. The other peasants had to struggle with their small amount of land and were again refused land from the rich. The affluent did not care for the lower classes and dwelled in their wealth and power.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The British prime minister Lloyd George wrote in a confidential memorandum to Clemenceau at the Versailles Peace Conference: "The whole of Europe is filled with the spirit of revolution. There is a deep sense not only of discontent but of anger and revolt amongst the workmen against prewar conditions.

  2. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    He instituted rigid censorship and police supervision of intellectual activities. His rulings oppressed the Jews and the ethnic minorities, and forced to live in certain areas, not allowed to enter certain professions and killed in large numbers. This was the time of the Marxist theories, which found much support among the factory workers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work