• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyze the part played by the failure of Tsardom in the Feb/March revolution in 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Essay Analyze the part played by the failure of Tsardom in the Feb/March revolution in 1917. Maybe it was fated for Russia to become a democracy or a socialist state; for all signs pointed towards an empty throne. Tsardom, in Russia, had proved successful in the past as the Tsar carefully managed his power and, at least in the Golden years of the Tsarist era, somewhat appeased or completely suppressed the people. And the people did not expect much more in that the Tsar did not offer much more. As long as they stayed out of his pursuits, they lived to see the sun rise the next day (instead of seeing a firing squad taking aim at them). But it was the evident weakness that the people saw in Tsar Nicholas II, and the manifest repercussions that rippled forcefully throughout the economic and social sectors of Russian life, that made the Imperial Throne no more than a threat to the people and the Crown: no more than a symbol of power, wantonly used because of insecurity. ...read more.

Middle

If one could sum up the entire public opinion of Russia at that time in one word: it would be dissatisfaction. There was dissatisfaction in almost all aspects of the Russian community: the military, workers and peasants. The feudal framework had been abolished by Tsar Alexander II, in which serfs were tied to their land and were answerable to feudal lords. Ironically enough, he replaced the feudal lords with land captains and communes. And the serfs were not happy: they had been taken out of the frying pan and thrown in the fire. This found its climax, until 1917, in the 1905 Revolution, which was quickly suppressed. Now, under Tsar Nicholas, their resentment was beginning to show again: they expected change, they got now. The military was equally distressed. They were forced to fight in the Great War and suffered heavy losses. There were not enough guns for every soldier and a soldier had to depend on the death of his colleague for a gun to fight with. ...read more.

Conclusion

When he failed to, the revolutionaries could make their promises, (the socialists could promote their ideology as a better alternative), and offer a better future. And the millions of peasants and workers that supported them later proved to be their biggest asset; and the Tsar biggest loss. The fragility of Tsardom under Tsar Nicholas II was proven through the quick disintegration of the Throne. He was so weak in personality that he himself abdicated his crown. Revolutionaries, from then on, had to assume the role that the Tsar played in a more democratic fashion: and this was almost blindly accepted. The Revolution occurred could end as quickly as it started. One can conclude that the Tsar left the throne dishonored not only in that he abdicated himself but in that he was the key factor that placed upon the throne leaders who were driven by ruthlessness3: he took Russia with it when he fell. 1 The 1917 February/March Revolution. 2 There was a sudden growth of revolutionary parties/groups consisting of two main powers: the Social Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats. 3 Lenin and Stalin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    This source should be very accurate, as Durnovo would have an excellent view and understanding of the political situation. The memorandum states that if Russia did go to war and were defeated, a social revolution would be the probable outcome.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    In June, sailors of the battleship Potemkin mutinied. This was rather worrying event for the government, for it was easy for ideas to spread in armies and there were possibilities that other sections of the army might also mutiny. By May and June, different groups were demanding changes.

  1. What were the causes of the March 1917 Revolution?

    This event showed that royalty had lost complete control over the country. Riots built up and soon they uncontrollable, and so the revolution began. To conclude, I believe that the revolution was down to a number of things. The poor working conditions outraged and annoyed the lower class citizens to a point were they were also starving.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    himself nevertheless, his train was detoured and sent to meet with generals and advisors who could not and would not support him, having a strong belief that his abdication would fully divert revolution.

  1. Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

    As a result of this more peasants would support the Tsar. Unfortunately, he didn't have enough time to enforce this idea as he was assassinated by a revolutionary in the "Kiev Opera House", on September 14th 1911. This was very unfortunate as Stolypin was a bright man and new what was good for the Tsar.

  2. History Essay: Why was the March 1917 revolution successful?

    Meanwhile, the Tzar decided to write a manufactory. It consisted in: the oppression and destruction towards the soviets. In addition, the Tzar brought many soldiers that were in the war against Japan to crash any revolution that occurred. A very important point in the manufactory was the authorization of the

  1. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    The social structure of Russia was also a long-term cause, and was brought about by the misrule of the Romanov house. The Romanov rulers were autocratic, which meant they had absolute power. The social structure of Russia had been this way for hundreds of years, but as other countries changed

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    It can be stopped only by the efforts of all workers; and when we came to power, our task � was to retain that power, that torch of socialism, so that it might scatter as many sparks as possible to add to the growing flames of socialist revolution." (LCW, Vol.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work