• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arab Israeli Superpower Involvement

Extracts from this document...


Arab/Israeli Superpower's Involvement United States *Attempted to fill void that B and F had left in Middle East because influence in the region provided them with a source of trade and a producer of primary resources. *The Suez Canal was a key link to the Far East. *Clear by 1960s that US economy became dependant on oil. Therefore they invest heavily in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi, Iran. *Remain friends with Arabs to counter Hitler's need for oil. *Had significant and influential population (especially in New York and on Eastern seaboard). Significant as lobby group in US politics. Truman was accused of pandering to Jewish vote when US threw its support behind the formation of a Jewish state. *Also supported Jewish migration to Palestine, but long refused Jews to immigrate in significant numbers (Zenophobia). They were reluctant of Jews to US, but supported Zionism. ...read more.


*Supplies weapons to Saudi Arabia and Jordan. *In 1967 Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban went to USA to seek support, US Secretary of Defence Dean Rusk said "I don't think it's in our business to restrain anyone." *Always concerned about security and access to Suez Canal. Soviet Union *Dependence of the US on this region made it vulnerable and a prized sphere of influence. *Access to Suez Canal priority #1 for USSR (be E's friend). *Russia had traditional interests in the waterway between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. *Took opportunity to allow USSR Jewish population to emigrate. *Had historical connections with frontier Arab countries Turkey & Iran. Their strategic importance remained pivotal to the USSR *However they were wary of Arab developments of Soviet Republics because their population was largely Muslim. ...read more.


Both *Middle East's strategic position and oil producing capacity meant it could not escape realities of Cold War, and that it would inevitably reach the Middle East. *Lobbed in UN for Jewish state. *Suez Crisis broke out 1956, superpowers not directly involved, this was to be short-lived as early as 31 Oct 1956 and they presented resolutions to the Security Council, calling on I to recall from the Sinai. Both worked to stop fighting. Europe *Britain and France had significant interests in ME. Preserving their interests often brought them in conflict with local Arab populations. *British interests were threefold - strategy, oil, and prestige. *However the strains and devastation of WWII, and the growing public pressure sort to hand the issue of the ME to the UN. *Britain opposed Jewish migration. *In 1967 Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban toured France and Britain to seek support. F believed Arabs were bluffing & B said they could not help without support of the USA. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History the 1960s

    Abortions, however, were seen as a danger to society. The Catholic Church opposed abortion as it went against its doctrines. Some people believed that women could use abortion as a birth control. This was not its correct usage. Some also believed that it would undermine society and social values as marriages could be reduced to physical, sexual acts only, thereby weakening British society.

  2. history coursework - arab israeli conflict

    The source blames Israel for the refugee problem. Reading this source alone, one would believe that the entire refugee problem would be the fault of the Israelis, but the source is heavily biased and given in the Palestinian point of view. The source fails to mention a few major details which could help you conclude, such as the

  1. question 5 source questions Arab Israeli conflict

    They use strong, powerful words such as "drench this land with your blood." These statements are propagating the fact that they do not agree with the state of Israel and letting the Israelis know that. Again I don't think this can be regarded as reliable evidence as it might agree with statement a)

  2. Stoke Bruerne: Canal lives

    The information from the source is quite good in telling us about the lives of young people who lived on canals and how the pattern of education they received. Coming from the memories of Jack Allen, it is likely to be reliable and quite accurate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work