• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand - this gave Austria excuse to attack Serbia after it had failed to agree terms; Schlieffen Plan - once Germany decided to mobilise, it had to attack France in order to prevent war on two fronts.

Extracts from this document...


Short-term causes: Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand; this gave Austria excuse to attack Serbia after it had failed to agree terms; Schlieffen Plan - once Germany decided to mobilise, it had to attack France in order to prevent war on two fronts. Long term causes of World War One - open to debate, but possibly the continuing power vacuum created by the collapse of the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire: this resulted in an upsurge in Serbian nationalism and territorial ambitions of Austria-Hungary Versus Russia. The second is possibly the alliance system. This meant that if one power went to war then the others would be drawn in. Matching these two causes is not difficult...and it is easy to see how a tiny spark could ignite the whole of Europe in war. Third: closely linked the alliance system, the development of massed armies - everyone seemed to be getting ready to fight. No one really expected a long war - except, strangely, Moltke, the leader of the German general staff. ...read more.


The word 'Kaiser' is simply a German word for King. Wilhelm II, was Kaiser/King, of Germany before the IstWW. Germany was a newly formed country, only set up in 1871, after several wars in the 19thC. to bring together a lot of German speaking states into one new country. So, many Germans wanted to become even greater and have an overseas Empire like the British and the French. They also felt that they needed an Empire to help trade, to get raw materials from and sell goods to, for strategic military bases and for living space for the German people. So, you are right. Kaiser Wilhelm did talk of getting Germany a 'Place in the Sun' (an overseas Empire). This did worry France and Britain as they had brought most of the world under their control and if Germany started looking for overseas land, then it seemed likely to be a threat to their empires, their trade routes and their military bases overseas. ...read more.


Were the main causes long-term? These could include: nationalism, arms races, competition for colonies, German fear of encirclement/French fear of German strength, German expansionism, alliance systems. Try and sort these into order of importance. For example, as all the major colonial questions were settled long before 1914 (and because some disputes pitted Britain against France!) so they could not have been the main cause of war. Would the alliances have existed if countries hadn't been very frightened of each other in the first place? Was the real problem newly-united Germany: was it too strong and too bent on grabbing land from others? But you might end up thinking that NONE of these made war likely. So you'll need to ask whether the main cause was short term. So was the First World War and accident? For example, maybe no-one wanted a big war in 1914. Did the German Schlieffen Plan make it impossible to leave France out, even though the Germans wanted to? These are just a few ideas about approaching this huge problem. Pick out one line of argument and see where it gets you! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Who was to blame for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914? ...

    4 star(s)

    This source is reliable as it is a map of the route taken by Ferdinand which is neither a primary nor secondary source. This follows the blame that his assassination was due to chance and luck that he had unfortunately taken the wrong direction.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    Both statesmen and generals miscalculated, the former in their belief that mobilization would not necessarily mean war, the latter in their belief that if and when war did come, it could be won quickly and decisively. Some criticism of the view a.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The Generals were not familiar with "modern" warfare and used old and basically useless techniques. One of these was to shell the enemy's trenches before a new wave of soldiers, in an attempt to "soften them up". However, this was useless as 1 in 3 British shells that were fired

  2. Failure of the Schlieffen Plan.

    The German commander, General Erich von Falkenhayn, decided that his troops must at all costs hold onto those parts of France and Belgium that Germany still occupied. Falkenhayn ordered his men to dig trenches that would provide them with protection from the advancing French and British troops.

  1. Tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand; heir to the ...

    The Russo-Turkish war 1877 brought about the Treaty of San Stephano 1878. Serbia, Austria-Hungary's Slavic neighbour and other Balkan states gained independence. Freed from the 'claws' of the Ottoman Empire (Turkey). This major development only added to Austria-Hungary's problems, as the balance of power in the Balkans changed.

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    When France quickly paid off the indemnity and then began to build up an army, Germany was greatly alarmed. There were two possibilities before her - either to attack her militarily, but it would not be accepted by other European powers as the new Germany was regarded with both envy and distrust; or try hard to isolate her diplomatically.

  1. In order for it to succeed, must a strategic alliance be an alliance between ...

    However, I would argue that performance criteria such as longevity and profitability do not give a fair reflection of the nature of an alliance. For example, an alliance may last several years but may be characterised by a dominant party appropriating the majority of the surplus value and the weaker party simply doing their job, gaining relatively small benefits.

  2. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    The men stacking the filled bags should work in pairs and were expected to move sixty bags an hour. In training I learnt that if a typical bullet were shot at a sandbag it would only penetrate fifteen inches into a sandbag.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work