• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assesement of Haig and other Generals in WW1

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Criticisms of Haig World War I introduced a new type of warfare including a revolution of new weapons and technology. Never before has a battle been fought at such a large scale and importance. The fate of Europe depended on this war. After the failure in 1915, Sir John French was replaced by the experienced Sir Douglas Haig. Much was expected from Haig but during his first battle, the Battle of the Somme, the British army under his command lost the largest number of soldiers in history. The number of casualties was unlike ever before and all blame was placed on the general that led them. This infamous event earned Haig the title as 'The Butcher of the Somme'. WWI introduced many new weapons and technology, many of which Haig resisted to use. The machine gun was heavily used by the Germans and led to the killing of many British soldiers, but Haig referred to it as an 'overrated weapon'. Haig's main offence was that he did not change or create a new tactic to accommodate the use of the new weapons. By never visiting the fronts, he led the soldiers to believe that he had no care for them. He stood far behind the lines, which enabled him to obtain a 'helicopter view' of the fighting. This seemed beneficial, but Haig did not put into consideration how brutal and heavy the war was going to be. ...read more.

Middle

This took away the element of surprise which allowed the Germans to prepare. Haig had the large and powerful British navy at his command, which sadly, he did not utilise. Haig had a large army, powerful navy and many new weapons which he should have used efficiently to create an effective strategy, instead of sending his troops over the top, dozens of times. With this careless tactic, Haig gave the impression of being, as many described him as, "unimaginative and dull." A good General must not be this, but in fact be creative and able to efficiently utilise all of their resources to generate brilliant tactics. On the other hand, Haig's 'tactic' was to basically send all of his troops over the top in order to wear down Germany. Although this worked in the end, it came at a huge cost and destroyed his name. Defence of Haig and other Generals When evaluating the Generals leadership in WWI, we must not only look at the number of casualties made and blame the people in charge, but we have to evaluate the position the generals were in and their situation. WWI was a revolutionary war which introduced the use of new technology and weapons. It displayed the largest scale battle ever fought in history. The generals were set to command the largest army ever set by their respective countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

By the end of the battle, the British Army had suffered 420,000 casualties, the French losing 200,000 men and the Germans nearly 500,000. These figures show that all sides lost many men and were in stalemate. "The German army had been fought to a standstill and was utterly worn out."5 Haig's costly method was effective and in the end, killed more Germans than Britain's. Haig was involved in the Battle of the Somme against his will. It was due to the alliances that this war took place so this should be the reason for the many casualties. But in the end, Haig ultimately led Britain to victory in the Battle of the Somme. He continued leading Britain to their largest number of consecutive victories in history. All the countries lost hundreds of thousands of men in the war and were all in stalemate, but Britain under the command of Haig made the only breakthrough between all the generals in Britain, France and Germany. Too much responsibility and expectations were placed on Haig but in the end, it was his side that won the war. Haig should be praised for not allowing emotions to conflict with his decisions and being able to cope with all of Britain's anger placed on him. 1 Winston Churchill, The World Crisis 2 JM Bourne, Britain and the Great War (1989) 3 PW Turner and RH Haigh, Not for Glory (1969) 4 Haig, Order of the Day (11 April 1918) 5 General Ludendorff, War Memoirs (1920) ?? ?? ?? ?? Sheheryar IB1-2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Does General Douglas Haig deserve to be remembered as the butcher of the Somme(TM)?

    This source is talking negatively about Haig. John Laffin writing in his history book 'British Butchers and Bunglers of WW1' in 2003 states that Haig should be blamed because he knew what he was doing. Haig saw the German trenches and the barbed wire and knew that Germans were stronger, but he didn't take that into consideration.

  2. British Recruitment WW1

    I think the provenance of this source does not need to be put under the spotlight due to their being many similar stories alike to Buxton's. This source does not boast any facts, it is simply one man's story, therefore it is very hard for it not to be anything but a very accurate source.

  1. Courses of WW1

    Nationalism Nationalism has two meanings. The first one is desire for independence by the people occupies by the largest power. This is the position Serbia were in. The second meaning is to regain nation greatness. France wanted to do this as Alsace-Lorraine was taken from them.

  2. Did Haig deserve his reputation

    the Germans knew that the British were forming an attack. This meant the all they had to do was come out of their trenches and set up their own weapons. 150,000 men were sent over the top from the British trenches along the 18 mile front, all of them expecting

  1. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    However the attack was designed to destroy the German manpower and not to get any territorial gain. At first Joffre intended for to use mainly French soldiers but the German attack on Verdun in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into an almost all British attack.

  2. How were the lives of women on the home front affected by WW1?

    I think that this is a reliable source though the author, as a campaigner for women's rights, may have had cause for slight exaggeration. The jobs women were doing were often romanticised by the government, who quickly latched onto the idea of using the war workers for propaganda reasons.

  1. Battle of the Somme

    However this doesn't stop Private George Coppard being exact with his facts. You'd think that years after the battle he's memory wouldn't be as good and he would therefore be lenient with the amount of casualties. However this wasn't the case with George Coppard as he states: "Hundred of dead,

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    the warnings given by his scouts; Custer ordered an immediate attack on the village. It is reported that Mitch Boyer stated "If we go in there we will never come out" which is un-reliable because there were no survivors to back it up.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work