• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people. Lenin had a great impact on Russia and the Russian people with his range of policies and events that took place during his time in power. These had both economic and political effects which can be further categorized into long or short term impacts. In 1917, when the Provisional Government replaced the Tsar, Lenin returned from Finland to help the Bolsheviks. On his arrival he made speeches and wrote up the April Thesis. The slogans created from these had a short, but powerful impact: the Bolsheviks, recently a barely known Party, became the third most popular Party in Russia, and this over a relatively short period of time. On the 23rd of October Lenin -returning once again from his hiding place in Finland- spent a whole night arguing with leading Bolsheviks to seize power and finally managed to convince them. On the 7th of November the takeover began and soon the Bolsheviks were in charge. Later on they changed their name into Communists, who ruled Russia till 1991. Thus it is easy to see the - very - long term impact which Lenin created by realising when the right time for a revolution was and managing to persuade others of his view of point. ...read more.


He ordered Church land to be confiscated by the state and some priests were even sent into exile. It was also forbidden to teach religion for people under fifteen. This was a long-term effect as it became a feature of the Soviet Union. Stalin himself forbid the practice of religion during his rule, opening the Churches only once during the Second World War to boost briefly the morale of the people. Lenin also eliminated the middle and higher classes. During War Communism many middle-class people sold their belongings to survive, while some nobles fled abroad. This remained the same during the 74 years of Communism in Russia, thus it can be considered a long term impact. As ending the war was crucial for the Russians at the time Lenin became leader, he sent Trotsky to negotiate peace with the Germans. The result was the harsh Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which's short term impact was that Russia dropped out of the First World war and was able to concentrate on her internal affairs. However Russia lost huge amounts of territory and natural resources as well, which is a long term impact. ...read more.


However, the impacts of this policy were short, as soon after Lenin's death when Stalin emerged as leader, NEP was abolished as it wasn't considered to be 'Communistic' enough and Stalin believed that only a state planned economy could help Russia to become a powerful and modern industrialized country. He also minimized foreign trade with the West as the hostility between the Communists and Capitalists grew stronger. It is easy to see that Lenin had and immense impact both on Russia and its inhabitants. Short term political and economic impacts brought major and almost sudden changes to the Russians. The people barely had time to realize that the 300 year old Tsarist regime ended, that Lenin had overthrown the Provisional Government and introduced a completely different style of leadership under Communism. During the next five years he first introduced war Communism, causing the victory of the Red Army, but a devastating harvest in 1921, and then the NEP, which brought a rapid, but short-term increase in standards of living. Even after his death, his ideas influenced significantly the course of history, both of Russia's and the world's. For more than seven decades Communism and the command economy survived in Russia, and leaders after leaders followed Lenin's ideas about Communism put into practice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Diana Lucaci -- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess The Impact Of Stalin On Russia And The Russian People.

    4 star(s)

    He used the Yezhovs NKVD to crush any opponents or potential threats. They arrested and shot hundreds of thousands of people from different ranks in society. Stalin personally chose hundreds of the people who were to be killed. The victims included party officials and army leaders, which proved to be

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    peasants also fell ill and were forced to go to hospital and there was a strong opinion and movement in improving the health service. People who were willing to work hard could do well. Workers who stayed in one job and obeyed factory discipline received higher pay, better conditions and better housing.

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    A government minister ordered the Bishops to train their Priests to preach Loyalty to the Tsar. To most Russian's it must have seen as if there was a little difference between the duty of God and the obedience of their Emperor.

  2. Gladkov's Cement is a novel depicting post civil war Russia during 1921.

    I've been hanging round waiting for you here like a deserted mongrel, and I haven't slept for nights." (27) Dasha spent all her time concentrating on the work of the revolution, and ignored her child and husband. Gladkov makes it clear that family life in Russia is in a horrible state that ought not to be in.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin will not let him live, because that man is a constant reminder that hem, Stalin is not the first and the best.' Bukharin speaks about how he believes that Stalin is a malicious man who was only shown as being the best at everything as he had destroyed all of his competition.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    1936 242.2 110.5 82.8 1937 243.7 116.0 91.2 1938 242.4 117.2 93.3 1939 241.1 114.9 94.0 1940 236.3 117.6 94.5 This source supports collectivisation as a success because in the end it did complete what it set out to do these figures support this as a success because collective farms skyrocketed.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    he is shown to be reading a paper with the convictions on it. Stalin looks very tired and jaded when reading the paper. This could reflect that this event has happened so frequently it has become the "norm" and was routine as the outcome was predictable and death was inevitable no matter whether they where innocent or guilty.

  2. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Though, collectivisation did succeed in some ways. It achieved one of its major aims. The government was able to collect double the amount of tax, in the form of grain. They were then able to export this in order to finance industrialisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work