• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty Make reference to: 1. The role of the Tsar 2. Nicholas' personal attributes 3. Russo-Japanese War 4. Bloody Sunday The execution of Tsar Nicholas II and his family in July 1918 signalled the brutal end of a Romanov Dynasty that had survived for hundreds of years in Russia. Such a dynasty had relied on a system known as 'Tsarism'- that is, having a single man ruling the entire Russian empire. Whilst the revolution of 1918 is often seen as being the sole, definitive end to this dictatorial system it was in truth, the final blow in a long sequence of ill-fated events. The Romanov Dynasty had been in rapid decline for a number of years, with inopportune events first beginning to accumulate between the years 1894-1905. The significance and importance of such events differ greatly in the way they contributed to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

Middle

He was completely oblivious to the state of affairs in Russia at the time and his ignorance of the conditions faced by the peasants was almost astonishing. Once again, Nicholas' personal characteristics play quite an important role in the decline of the dynasty as he had the power to basically do what we wished - whether that was issuing orders or introducing new laws, taxes etc.. Had Nicholas the vision, or perhaps intelligence, to foresee that the role of a 20th Century Tsar would need some alterations, the whole scenario could have been reversed and the dynasty would have never even begun to decline. The people would have still loved him and his position would not be at risk. What Nicholas did not realize was that in order for the dynasty to survive and flourish, it was him who needed to change and become more compatible - not the system. Nicholas character further thwarts his chance to stop the decline by trying to maintain a 'benevolent dictator' status. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even though the defeat was down more to unmanageable factors i.e. the sheer size of Russia, Nicholas was forced to bear the brunt of much criticism. The events of January 22 1905 have gone in history as 'Bloody Sunday' - a day where Nicholas II's soldiers fired upon hundreds of peaceful and religious marchers. This event is undoubtedly the most important of the above four in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. Up until this day, the people had been growing annoyed with the Tsar but still did not have any real incentives to revolt. The massacre that took place basically destroyed the Tsar's reputation - even though he had no say in the actual events that unfolded. It was the first time that he was truly seen to be at blame as people began to realize that this man who they idolized, didn't really even know they existed (let alone were being killed!) It was highly significant in accelerating the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    At this time the Tsar is away from home and performing his willed duty as the Commander-In-Chief of the Russian army, this is portrayed in the source as he is dressed in his military uniform.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    The cartoon is mocking Stalin and his 'show trials' The men who are put on trial are seen happy and sarcastically admitting what they have been accused of. Source J is a cartoon published in France in the late 1930's, the title of the cartoon is 'The Stalinist Constitution'.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    This is further reinforced by the way in which Stalin is the judge and the gallows in the background shows how Stalin has already decided their fate. Of course we know that this was how it was in the show trials.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    in reality on great engineering projects such as dams and canals, many of the workers were prisoners who had been sentenced to hard labour for being political opponents or suspected opponents of Stalin or for being kulaks. Source B doesn't show the harsh factory life under Stalin.

  1. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

    Russia was overwhelmingly agricultural throughout this period. She was the 'granary of Europe' even though many peasants starved to death.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    Was Lenin more significant for his actions in 1917 or for his subsequent actions from 1918 to 1924? Lenin was a Russian revolutionary and was best known for being one of the main leaders of the October Revolution in 1917 and the first head of the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic.

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    How do you think people in France would have reacted to this source? I think that this picture would cause great support for the Russians because the French had already gone through their revolution and realised the need for a democracy and a good ruler.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    and D (2). These sources tell us Stalin is a kind and caring man, something that isn't certain is whether the sources are reliable or not. Source D (1) was written by Stalin in 1945 it is him looking back on an event of the past, when he was in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work