• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty Make reference to: 1. The role of the Tsar 2. Nicholas' personal attributes 3. Russo-Japanese War 4. Bloody Sunday The execution of Tsar Nicholas II and his family in July 1918 signalled the brutal end of a Romanov Dynasty that had survived for hundreds of years in Russia. Such a dynasty had relied on a system known as 'Tsarism'- that is, having a single man ruling the entire Russian empire. Whilst the revolution of 1918 is often seen as being the sole, definitive end to this dictatorial system it was in truth, the final blow in a long sequence of ill-fated events. The Romanov Dynasty had been in rapid decline for a number of years, with inopportune events first beginning to accumulate between the years 1894-1905. The significance and importance of such events differ greatly in the way they contributed to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

Middle

He was completely oblivious to the state of affairs in Russia at the time and his ignorance of the conditions faced by the peasants was almost astonishing. Once again, Nicholas' personal characteristics play quite an important role in the decline of the dynasty as he had the power to basically do what we wished - whether that was issuing orders or introducing new laws, taxes etc.. Had Nicholas the vision, or perhaps intelligence, to foresee that the role of a 20th Century Tsar would need some alterations, the whole scenario could have been reversed and the dynasty would have never even begun to decline. The people would have still loved him and his position would not be at risk. What Nicholas did not realize was that in order for the dynasty to survive and flourish, it was him who needed to change and become more compatible - not the system. Nicholas character further thwarts his chance to stop the decline by trying to maintain a 'benevolent dictator' status. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even though the defeat was down more to unmanageable factors i.e. the sheer size of Russia, Nicholas was forced to bear the brunt of much criticism. The events of January 22 1905 have gone in history as 'Bloody Sunday' - a day where Nicholas II's soldiers fired upon hundreds of peaceful and religious marchers. This event is undoubtedly the most important of the above four in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. Up until this day, the people had been growing annoyed with the Tsar but still did not have any real incentives to revolt. The massacre that took place basically destroyed the Tsar's reputation - even though he had no say in the actual events that unfolded. It was the first time that he was truly seen to be at blame as people began to realize that this man who they idolized, didn't really even know they existed (let alone were being killed!) It was highly significant in accelerating the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    While he was staying at the Tsar's residence, he was rumoured to have many affairs, even with the Tsarina. The utter fact that the source is a Russian cartoon indicates that the suggestions made are openly thought and that people agree.

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Achievements such as those in source B might never have happened without Stalin's influence. These helped modernise an ailing Russia to bring her back as one of the world's superpowers. Some would say that the amount of happiness that Stalin's five year plans caused in ordinary workers lives outweighed the pain and suffering that were necessary to make them work.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    By showing that he cares for every man in the source he shows how manipulative he really was. Stalin uses the source to manipulate the USSR into thinking that he is in fact a person that cares for every man.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    in reality on great engineering projects such as dams and canals, many of the workers were prisoners who had been sentenced to hard labour for being political opponents or suspected opponents of Stalin or for being kulaks. Source B doesn't show the harsh factory life under Stalin.

  1. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

    This meant that much of the country was illiterate. The Russian Monarchy wished to change this. The government at the time were Autocrats. There was a massive bureaucracy throughout Russia, and the country was based on a centralised government. Another weakness of the Russian monarchy at the time was their lack of understanding about how bad many situations were in Russia at the time.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    But was Lenin more significant for his actions in 1917 or his subsequent actions from 1918 to 1924? That is the question I will be exploring in this essay and I will be thinking of all of his actions in the mentioned years.

  1. Assess the extent to which the political incompetence of Nicholas II led to the ...

    I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling...or talking to ministers (as quoted in Brooman 1986 p 4)." The scholar Van Der Kiste (1998 p 154) notes Nicholas' sister Olga's opinion of the new Tsar: he kept telling us (the Romanov family)

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    They would have sympathised with the peasants who only requested better living conditions and more respect from people higher in society. They would have experienced everything that the Russian peasants were going through and many people would have supported the Russians case in living conditions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work