• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the events that occurred between 1894 and 1905 to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty Make reference to: 1. The role of the Tsar 2. Nicholas' personal attributes 3. Russo-Japanese War 4. Bloody Sunday The execution of Tsar Nicholas II and his family in July 1918 signalled the brutal end of a Romanov Dynasty that had survived for hundreds of years in Russia. Such a dynasty had relied on a system known as 'Tsarism'- that is, having a single man ruling the entire Russian empire. Whilst the revolution of 1918 is often seen as being the sole, definitive end to this dictatorial system it was in truth, the final blow in a long sequence of ill-fated events. The Romanov Dynasty had been in rapid decline for a number of years, with inopportune events first beginning to accumulate between the years 1894-1905. The significance and importance of such events differ greatly in the way they contributed to the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

Middle

He was completely oblivious to the state of affairs in Russia at the time and his ignorance of the conditions faced by the peasants was almost astonishing. Once again, Nicholas' personal characteristics play quite an important role in the decline of the dynasty as he had the power to basically do what we wished - whether that was issuing orders or introducing new laws, taxes etc.. Had Nicholas the vision, or perhaps intelligence, to foresee that the role of a 20th Century Tsar would need some alterations, the whole scenario could have been reversed and the dynasty would have never even begun to decline. The people would have still loved him and his position would not be at risk. What Nicholas did not realize was that in order for the dynasty to survive and flourish, it was him who needed to change and become more compatible - not the system. Nicholas character further thwarts his chance to stop the decline by trying to maintain a 'benevolent dictator' status. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even though the defeat was down more to unmanageable factors i.e. the sheer size of Russia, Nicholas was forced to bear the brunt of much criticism. The events of January 22 1905 have gone in history as 'Bloody Sunday' - a day where Nicholas II's soldiers fired upon hundreds of peaceful and religious marchers. This event is undoubtedly the most important of the above four in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. Up until this day, the people had been growing annoyed with the Tsar but still did not have any real incentives to revolt. The massacre that took place basically destroyed the Tsar's reputation - even though he had no say in the actual events that unfolded. It was the first time that he was truly seen to be at blame as people began to realize that this man who they idolized, didn't really even know they existed (let alone were being killed!) It was highly significant in accelerating the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Late at night, on the 25 October, Trotsky's red Guards helped by the Kronstadt sailors took over the bridges in Petrograd and the telephones lines. They cut off Petrograd off from the rest of Russia. The Red Guards took over the Government buildings, the banks and the railway station.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Q3 Source E is taken from a speech by a writer to the Congress of Soviets in 1935. This speech was published in a communist party paper, called Pravda. It is an extremely exaggerated view of what the Russian people thought of Stalin at the time.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Source H is a Petrograd police report, October 1916. This source opens with "Military defeats brought the masses a clearer understanding of the problems of war - unfair distribution of foodstuffs", ; which indicates that the Russian civilians were

  2. Stalin man or monster

    A painting reliant on an artistic invention Influenced by harsh censorship governed by Stalin where he would've not welcomed an unflattering critical picture the artist would have been punished. Propaganda was needed to increase support of Communism as an ideology to show that it was better the capitalism heroic Russian

  1. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

    Russia was overwhelmingly agricultural throughout this period. She was the 'granary of Europe' even though many peasants starved to death.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    for a revolutionary overturn in order to conquer peace, bread and land. This could only be achieved by a revolutionary alliance with the proletariat. The realisation of this fact was registered in the Soviet elections by a sharp swing to the left.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    We cannot work out from this source if the story Stalin tells is true. This is not important, however, as the evidence we glean from this source is about Stalin himself, not about his past. Unfortunately we cannot work out from the source that Stalin is referring to when Stalin says "our enemies".

  2. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    it is source A which portrays Stalin as a brutal murderer, which is closer to the truth than sources B and C, which falsely portray Stalin as a kind-hearted, respectable and popular man. 2. Study Source D. Does it provide any useful evidence about Stalin?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work