• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ATTITUDES TOWARDS WOMEN AND THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE HAD CHANGED BY 1918. HOW IMPORTANT WAS THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN BRINGING ABOUT THIS CHANGE?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Eliot Proctor QUESTION 2- ATTITUDES TOWARDS WOMEN AND THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE HAD CHANGED BY 1918. HOW IMPORTANT WAS THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN BRINGING ABOUT THIS CHANGE? In early 1918 the Representation of the People Act was passed which meant that people over the age of 30 or were over 21 householders or wives of householders were allowed to vote. This showed that woman's effort in the war had changed attitudes but before campaigns had always failed. Yet attitudes about women had been changing slightly before hand as there were improvements in jobs, home life and education especially. Women had the chance to work as nurses, in shops, teaching and office work, although there were still restrictions in pay, hours and promotion. Education had been improving as girls were being taught, but only the necessary skills for finding husbands, such as needlework, dancing and etiquette. Family life had been improving as acts were brought in for single women to get custody of their children, own property and keep their pay. This shows improvements and a change in attitudes. The only attitude which had not yet changed was giving women the vote. Even with the two women's suffrage movements in the public eye, they still failed to get the vote. Although, women's effort during the war was definitely a reason why attitudes towards them were changing. ...read more.

Middle

Servants did not need much too persuade them, as wages and conditions in factories were better. This showed that the role women played during the war to men that women were actually responsible and this changed attitudes towards giving women the vote. The women's work during the war led to a change in attitude as they proved they were just as capable as men and therefore worthy of getting the vote, just as men did. In 1917, Ex. Prime Minister, Asquith, commented: "How could we have carried on the war without them?", "We see them doing work which three years ago we would have regarded as being exclusively men's work", "When the war is over the question will then arise about women's labour and their function in the new order of things. I would find it impossible to withhold from women the power and right of making their voices directly heard". This shows attitudes had changed. An article from the Observer paper in 1916 said: "Time was when I thought that men alone maintained the State. Now I know that men alone never could have maintained it and that henceforth the modern State must be dependent on men and women alike..." Millicent Fawcett wrote in 1916 in the 'common cause' magazine: "Former men opponents are now declaring themselves on our side or at any rate withdrawing their opposition"; "The view has been widely expressed that...exclusion of women from representation after the war will... ...read more.

Conclusion

The Suffragettes were more peaceful and calm about the way they went with their petitions, leaflets and arguing their case with MP's. They gained public support and most MP's agreed also, but they were seen as too moderate. On the other hand, the Suffragists were radical and violent, for instance slashing paintings, being chained to railings and harassing Ministers. They looked like they were untrustworthy and aggressive, as this did not help the situation. Yet they could not be ignored as they kept their issue and female suffrage in the public eye. Women's actions during the war were probably the most important reason in bringing about the change in attitude in 1918 as they proved very much that they were as capable as men and could most definitely do the jobs men did. MP's felt they could not ignore the issue after their effort and felt that women should have an input also. However, they would have probably gained the vote eventually, except it would have taken longer if it wasn't for the war. Although war was the main reason there were other reasons which changed the attitudes about women, such as before 1914 the improvements in careers, education, and family. Also the work of the Suffragists and Suffragettes helped gain women the vote. Yet if war hadn't happened and women hadn't shown they were just as good as men, this attitude of women would have been going on much longer and therefore in gaining the vote would have taken longer to be a success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why did women fail to gain the vote between 1900-1914?

    the reason for the decline of the Liberals because once out of power, Asquith was susceptible to great criticism and he was unable to defend himself. How important was the war in helping women gain the vote? In the years before 1914 there were many problems for women with their oppression, lack of respect and general miss- treatment by males.

  2. To what extent did the campaigns for women's suffrage lead to the women gaining ...

    and in the first two years of the war TNT poisoning had produced over 100 deaths. There was however some opposition to women's work, employers feared that women wouldn't do the work properly, the trade unions also feared that the untrained and unskilled women would work for lower wages than men, this would force men out of work.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Because of the severe losses in the battle, the French were able to contribute to the Allied offensive on the Somme only 16 divisions of the 40 originally planned; the offensive, which began on July 1 and continued until the middle of November, consequently was largely in the hands of the British.

  2. Explain why the attitudes of civilians towards the war changed from 1914 to 1918

    Source A is an official document with which he is trying to justify his actions to some higher authority. This shows Historians that Haig wasn't completely in charge and was being watched closely from, for example, the Prime Minister. This source is useful for giving us the opinions of possibly

  1. Why did the attitudes of soldiers towards the was change between 1914 and 1916?

    Gunner W Lugg said 'When I saw the poster, all I could think about was my own children and that they may think of me as a coward.

  2. How important was World War One in Bringing about the Change of Attitude towards ...

    Women discarded their social etiquettes as they had more important issues, like a person's life, to worry about. The votes for women scenario was rekindled when it was obvious that men who were present at the front line could not vote.

  1. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    But this was generally the view shared at the time, and it does show an attitude towards women. Women had gone through a great transition compared from 1914 to 1918. Woman were respected a lot more and thought of as a lot more valuable in society.

  2. How transport changed Stoke Bruerne

    It was started in 1793, but it kept collapsing. It was completely finished in 1805. Horses were used to pull barges along the towpath but there is no towpath through the tunnel that's why the legger's were used. (Visit + Guidebook) The top lock (14) was built in 1801 as a single lock, it remained as a single lock until 1835.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work