• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Barbarian Kingdoms: Medieval Europe

Extracts from this document...


041852 HTA256/356 Barbarian Kingdoms: Medieval Europe AD 300-700 Major Assignment Q.6 " 'The only thing we can truly know about early medieval barbarians is their sense of ethnicity.' Critically asses with reference to both primary sources and the arguments of modern secondary scholars." There has always been, and will most likely continue to be, great debate as to what we can or cant truly known about the "Barbarians". To the peoples of ancient Greece, and later, Rome, a barbarian was 'anyone who was not of their extraction or culture. Because most of these "strangers" regularly practiced raids upon these civilizations, the term "barbarian" gradually evolved into a perjorative term: a person who was sub-human, uncivilized, and regularly practiced the most vile and inhuman acts imaginable'. 1 In a good overall summary of the barbarians, it has been stated that these 'Barbarians' were 'a tall, fierce, fair- haired and fair-skinned people, in contrast to their swarthy counterparts from whence they had traveled. Quickly displacing or assimilating the indigenous people of the regions they entered, they (the barbarians) never truly settled anywhere, ever-moving as their needs and resources changed. Eventually they did settle and create homes and lifestyles for themselves, yet their culture was never elaborate. Those who they came in contact with considered them uncivilized, and yet were fascinated by their strength, stamina, force of will, charisma, and versatility. They were respected by those they befriended, and feared by those who opposed them. Even within their own society, they fought amongst themselves, seeking supremacy of power and controllership of the lands they acquired. Their fierce, warlike nature and coarse behaviors earned them the name "barbarians", meaning both "illiterates" and "wanderers".'2 There is a small selection of primary written evidence about the barbarians, sources that were written in the middle ages. ...read more.


Rather, there appear in the sources a whole series of Hunnic raiding parties, all pursuing independent aims'.13 However although this unusual social system helps to reinforce the barbarian's sense of difference, and was an important part of barbarian culture, it was believed that this lack of general stability within the tribes and the fact that the barbarians were under constant change, could ultimately jeopardise the general notion that the barbarians were a group who held a unique an distinct sense of ethnicity. Due to the fact that the barbarians were constantly on the move 'from location to location ever in search of a better home. Eventually, some of these (barbarians) settled in Byzentium and became known as Ostrogoths. Having little or no recorded history or culture, they would adapt the culture of the people in whose lands they settled'.14 Patrick Geary states that because the barbarian tribes were 'inherently unstable, these units constantly underwent transformation as kindreds feuded and split apart, warrior bands struck out to establish themselves as new tribes, and as tribes weakened by internal divisions were conquered and absorbed into other tribes. Still so long as this process took place among Germanic, Celtic and Slavic peoples all at rightly the same level of material and social organization, this instability remained in a state of equilibrium. But this equilibrium would be destroyed by contact with Rome'.15 Roman influence upon the barbarians is commonly seen as a contributing factor to the decline of a genuine barbarian ethnicity. It is conceivable that the barbarians, who were constantly in contact with and invading Rome, they were likely to adopt different cultures and practices that derived directly from the influential Roman Culture. ...read more.


Heather, Peter, 'The Goths', (oxford and Cambrdige, 1996). Heather, Peter, 'The Huns and the End of the Roman Empire in Western Europe', English Historical Review 110 (1995), 1-41. Joil, Genry. 'Barbarians.Celts', < http://www.lost-civilizations.net/celts-barbarians.html>, 21st April 2005. Otto Manchen- Helfen, 'The World of the huns: studies in their history and culture', (Berkely and Los Angeles, 1973). Oxford English Dictionary online, <www.oed.com>, 20th April 2005. Thompson, E.A, 'The Huns', (oxford, 1996). Wolfram, Herwig, 'History of the Goths', (Berkeley, 1988). Top of Form 1 Bottom of Form 1 1 Joil, Genry. 'Barbarians.Celts' < http://www.lost-civilizations.net/celts-barbarians.html>, 2 Crystal, Ellie. 'Barbarians', <http://www.crystalinks.com/barbarians.html> 3 Oxford English Dictionary, <http://www.oed.com> 4 Isidore of Sevilles, 'History of the Goths, Vandals, and Suevi', (Leiden, 1970), p.33. 5 Victor of Vita, 'History of the Vandal persecution', (Liverpool, 1992),p.3. 6 Marcellinus, Ammianus, 'The later Roman Empire, A.D. 353-378', (Harmondsworth, 1986),p.85. 7 Gibbon, Edward, 'The decline and fall of the Roman Empire', (London, 1960),p.4 8 Otto Manchen- Helfen, 'The World of the huns: studies in their history and culture', (Berkely and Los Angeles, 1973),p.12. 9 Thompson, E.A, 'The Huns', (oxford, 1996),p.1 10 Geary, Patrick, 'Before France and Germany : the creation and transformation of the Merovingian world', (New York, 1988),p.54. 11 Marcellinus, Ammianus, op. Cit., p.414. 12 Heather, Peter, 'The Huns and the End of the Roman Empire in Western Europe',p.11 13 Ibid., p.10. 14 Crystal, Ellie, , op. Cit. 15 Geary, Patrick, op. Cit., p.57. 16 Wolfram, Herwig, 'History of the Goths', (Berkeley, 1988), p.11. 17 Burns, Thomas, 'A history of the Ostro-Goths', (Bloomington, 1984), p.xiii. 18 Wolfram, Herwig, op. Cit., p.7. 19 Heather, Peter, 'The Goths', (oxford and Cambrdige, 1996),p. 311. 20 Ibid.,p.312. 21 Ibid. 22 Ibid., p.317. 23 Ibid., p.314. 24 Ibid. 25 Geary, Patrick, op. Cit., p.51. 26 Geary, Patrick, op. Cit., p.50. 27 Heather, Peter, op. Cit., p.317. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Reasons for the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

    Rome had already grown from a group of small villages to a small city. It had established a new government and called it a Republic "a thing of people." Sooner it developed into a large Empire by taking over Greece, Asia Minor, Macedonia in the east and Carthage in the west.

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    The Celtic sword had a strong blade and was a little longer than the Gladius but this didn't mean they were used in a different manner. Like the Gladius it would be used in a stabbing motion. (as can be seen in the picture)

  1. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    His knowledge of the whereabouts of the Isle of Man was also accurate. Tacitus is very self-assured of his knowledge of Britain's geography, assuring the reader that "where my predecessors relied on style to adorn their guesses, I shall offer assured fact."

  2. What were the origins of Roman religion and how did it progress?

    Apuleuis This new religion came to Rome from Egypt, a new part of the Roman Empire. This religion, instead of destroying the old beliefs, was simply added to them. The Roman people were attracted to the myth due to it's tales of love and sacrifice, and death and resurrection.

  1. Why the Roman army was so good

    The main method though was through training. After being accepted and sworn in, the new recruit was sent to his unit to begin training. This was thorough, systematic and physically hard. First the young soldier had to learn to march at the regulation pace for distances of up to 24 Roman miles (about 22 statute or 35km).

  2. How would you describe the emergence and meaning of Eurocentrism in relation to European ...

    the West would not have been able to recognise and represent itself as the summit of human history (Hall, 1993, p314). Another example of the contrast Europeans placed on themselves and others was the classification of race. Distinctions were made and emphasised: whites/non whites, the civilised/non civilised and the refined/rude

  1. US military History - A long telescope allows us to see how warfare evolved ...

    They had learned how to manage their flocks and domesticate animals. Dominance over the horse came natural for them. As with flock management, they became a most terrifying, useful, and prestigious weapon. They applied the techniques of breaking up flocks and scattering the flock leaders, to their slaughter and butchery of war.

  2. Life In The Trenches - research and evaluation of the sources

    Also, from my own knowledge I know that nurses lived in quite appalling living conditions as well, and because this woman was a nurse on the front line, her living conditions would have been nearly exactly the same as the soldiers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work