• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Between 1928 and 1941 Stalin had a huge effect on Russia.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Between 1928 and 1941 Stalin had a huge effect on Russia. He influenced and completely changed the industry, the agriculture and the society of Russia. In this essay, I will discuss if what he changed modernised Russia, and if so was it worth the cost paid for by the suffering population. Tsarist Russia was described as 'Tea, eggs and orthodoxy'. Tea, because the Russians were always hospitable; eggs, because a small percentage of the population were rich and could be symbolised by Faberg´┐Ż eggs, and orthodoxy because there was a social hierarchy (and because of the Russian orthodox religion). This 'order' came about mainly because of differences in wealth between different classes of people, so the different divisions were split. Also, the fact that the lower classes had no transport or news available, and some classes of people were of different nationalities to others which meant that the split between the classes grew. The hierarchy consisted of the Tsar, followed by members of the church, then the army, the industrialists, and finally the peasants. Many people were against this system, as they did not believe the Tsar was worthy of having ultimate control, and so the 1905 Revolution came about. ...read more.


Russia was backwards when Stalin came into power, and the economy was in a dire state. The economy was miles behind the British, American, German and other Western superpower's economies. Change was desperately needed. Lenin decided on doing '5 Year Plans'. These plans were drawn up by GOSPLAN, which meant that GOSPLAN had regional targets which were subdivided into cities, then factories, then to specific managers, then the overseers, then to each shift, then to each specific worker. The first 5 year plan focused on the major heavy industries. Although most targets set were not accomplished, Russia produced an enormous amount more than they previously had done in 1928. The second 5 year plan built on the achievements of the first one. Major heavy industries were still a priority, but other areas (i.e. mining, transport and communications) were improved. The third 5 year plan was to produce consumer goods, but was interrupted by WW2 in 1939. An indication that the industry was improved spectacularly was that Russia survived WW2, although suffering heavy losses, and the fact that their industrial outputs (e.g. electricity, iron, steel, coal and oil) increased by an size ranging from 250% increase to a 700% increase from 1928 to 1941. ...read more.


The education system was changed to make the people believe that Stalin was a great leader. Portraits, photographs and statues of Stalin were everywhere. Stalin poetry and music was widespread. All music and art was monitored by the NKVD so everything praised Stalin in one way or another. Religious worship was completely banned, and instead people were made to worship Stalin. God was, in effect, replaced with Stalin. I believe that this was not a modernised society, but a monstrous one. His actions did not improve conditions for anybody, but merely terrified them, and caused millions of unnecessary deaths solely for the sake of staying in power. In conclusion, I believe that Stalin modernised the industry of Russia between 1928 and 1941, but was unsuccessful in improving the agricultural needs of Russia, or improving living conditions, working conditions or life in general for the Russian population. His actions were seen to be controversial, and rightfully were. He improved Russia's industry, and kept power when using methods which would have otherwise led to him being removed from power; but the cost of keeping power was incalculable. Some historians estimate that 20,000,000 people died because of his actions, and I'm sure that 20,000,000 deaths would not be a price the Russian people, or indeed anyone, would be willing to pay simply for a stronger economy. Allen Hoten 11y Page 1 of 5 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    "If someone speaks better than he does, that man is for it! Stalin will not let him live." Trotsky was a threat to his position so Stalin accused him of disloyalty and expelled from the Party. Stalin was extremely paranoid and although Trotsky was expelled from the USSR he still thought Trotsky was planning another revolution.

  2. Is Stalin the Red Tsar?

    and political policies were truly evident as a cautious approach to running Russia. Stalin and his Communist ideals were progressive in their outlook to the future, building socialism through radical change to society. These extreme changes to society were all directed from the top from Stalin.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    working for five days and then closing at weekends, factories now worked all seven days of the week, with a fifth of the workers having their day off on any one day. To prevent workers from taking time off work, absenteeism was punished with the sack and with eviction from factory housing.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    Targets were incredibly high. Coal production, for example, in Russia, before the first five Year Plan, was 35.4 million tons. Stalin set the target for the first Five Year Plan at 68 million tons. To his disappointment though, only 64.3 million tons were produced.

  1. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    As a result of the Kulaks doing this, there was a dramatic decrease in the agricultural and livestock productions in the early 1930's. This resistance also lead Stalin to begin liquidating the Kulak people. He had most of the Kulaks marched off to remote and barren areas of the USSR

  2. Free essay

    The League of Nations was formed in 1919 to encourage the member countries to ...

    Also although many were angry with the Tsar, as many of them had remained loyal until Bloody Sunday, the protest which was held on the 22nd January 1905 was a peaceful one. This made it easier for the Nicholas to survive as the protestors had not made it a violent

  1. How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise ...

    Another major difference was the earlier terror had occurred under exceptional circumstances in the civil war, when Communist rule was under threat. The terror in the 1930's took place while Communist rule was firmly in place. It is necessary to make a clear distinction between 'The Purges' and 'The Terror'.

  2. How far by 1941, had the Soviet economy benefited from changes in agricultural policy ...

    He did not think it was because collective farms were not working he just immediately put the blame on the Kulaks and ordered them to be exterminated. On the other hand source A can be seen as good source of information to tell us how far the economy benefited from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work