Black country

Authors Avatar

What are the problems with using these sources to investigate working conditions in the mines of the Black Country in the nineteenth century?

Source A is written by George Barnsby who is a communist in 1750-1867, it tells you about the working conditions he says the owner owns a production estate the owner could of improve social conditions but he doesn’t. The writer focus’s on the right time period and right area. The writer mentions ‘the pillar and stall method’ and ‘the butty system’ we know this reliable because he is a professional.

        Source A fits well with my background knowledge which that mining isn’t safe. The source aims to persuade into thinking into his way because of the tone of the language he is using such as ‘twin evils’ and ‘death drops’. The author is a Marxist he wants everyone to have the same share, this makes most of the information biased because he favours the workers rather than mine owners, and believes that the mine workers are being exploited.

Source B is written by Samuel Cook in 1846 he talks about people getting killed in the working mines of Round’s Green, on November 18th. It focus’s on the right time, and place, and gives facts like; number of deaths, number of people injured, and how they died.  

Join now!

However it doesn’t have much information. Samuel Cook’s information is biased because he’s asking for money, therefore he is probably exaggerating. This makes the source unreliable. For example instead of just writing 19 men killed he wrote “19 men and boys roasted to death, this makes it sound more brutal”. Also he writes “another horrible! A most horrible MINE DIASTER!” To make it sound like it happens all the time, and to stress how fatal it is.

Source C is written by Marie Rowlands and she talks about the west midlands but she looks at a large period ...

This is a preview of the whole essay