• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday

Extracts from this document...


LUKE POLLIN ASSIGNMENT 1 Reliability of the sources on Bloody Sunday. Introduction The events which occurred in Londonderry on 30th became known as '' Bloody Sunday'' was a tragic event for the Irish people in 1972. Fourteen innocent civilians were gunned down in this horrific attack that took place during The Troubles. Feelings of hatred between nationalists and unionists was only fuelled which still lasts today because of it. The Irish people demanded an explanation on why Bloody Sunday happened and were given the Widgery Inquiry not long after the event. The result of this inquiry did not satisfy the Irish people as it cleared the army of all charges and blamed the victims of Bloody Sunday for starting the troubles. Improvements in science and technology as well as the existence of new evidence about what happened on that day have led to a new inquiry being set up by Lord Saville. Source A There have been many interpretations about what had happened on that day of Sunday. ...read more.


Source B Source B is another article taken from a newspaper. This time it is The Guardian, a pro-labour newspaper, so it may be more likely to favour the views of the Irish people. It was written by John Mullin, who is an Ireland correspondent. In my opinion this may suggest that his interpretation would be more accurate, as he has spent time in Ireland and may have more knowledge of what happened during the events on Bloody Sunday This article sympathises a lot with the victims of Bloody Sunday. The writer uses language to create an impression that the people killed were vulnerable victims of British paratroopers and places a large blame on the British Army. When he mentions 'dum-dum' bullets he makes us aware that the army were using unauthorised or illegal ammunition for their weapons during the day. He also mentions how worthless the evidence was during the Widgery Inquiry. He claims that there is no evidence to suggest that the victims were holding or even near any weapons that day, as no firearms or ammunition were found among the dead. ...read more.


For a start he wasn't even there and the news report is in November 2000, almost 30 years after the event This source may be biased, not just because it wasn't a first-hand account and 30 years after the tragedy, but due to the fact that the location was in a bar, meaning it is more than likely that he and the soldiers were under the influence of alcohol at the time, so it it is a strong possibility that he maybe giving false accusations towards the British Army. There is also a false statement in the source, the man said they would be 'landing' and 'clearing the bog' with 'tanks', this is incorrect as paratroopers use planes, not tanks. Also the source gives the reader an opinion that the soldiers were not planning on causing trouble that day. This man was drinking in 'England' so therefore he maybe familiar with the soldiers, which makes it very misleading for the reader. All in all, this source contributes very little or useless information about Bloody Sunday leaving us with questions still unanswered. So evidence up to this point in time is very much inconclusive ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    However, we are told that this cartoon was published by exiled enemies of the tsar, obviously extremists, and so their views may not have been shared by most of the workers. Source H would be useful to the historian because it shows how at least some of the marchers felt

  2. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    Gerry Adams didn't meet the president or Senator Edward Kennedy, an important Ireland America figure, who said it was because of the IRA's "ongoing criminal activity and contempt for the rule of law". This act showed that along with London and Dublin, Washington is highly critical of Sinn Fein.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    On the 24th January 1972Frabk Lagan the Chief superintendent of the RUC told Andrew Maclellan the commander 8 infantry brigade, that he had spoken to the civil rights association and told them that he wanted to hold a non-violent demonstration protesting against internment on 30 January 1972.

  2. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Internment not only provoked more violence but it galvanised support for the IRA and enabled republicans to raise money in the United States. It led to hundreds of street demonstrations one of which culminated in Bloody Sunday. The 1st Battalion Parachute Regiment The Paratroopers of this regiment were the people who killed and injured the innocent victims of Bloody Sunday.

  1. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source A, the official army statement approved by Sir Harry Tuzo, appears to be primarily about protecting the reputation of the British Army. It seems to be taking an unlikely line, seeing what the army would want to see the massacre to be rather than the truth.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 1

    This repressed most rights that the Catholics had, so there was more violence between the Catholics and Protestants, as they began to invade and burn each other's homes. To retort to this the Protestants formed the Orange Order in 1795, to maintain Protestant supremacy.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 2

    They were also ordered to send in "snatch squads" of soldiers to arrest any troublemakers, but soon things really kicked off. The army claimed to have been fired upon first and then return fire, but the Catholic leaders claim that no shots were fired at the army.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    of IRA atrocities, said that they could identify with people, they identified with Sands. That here was another Irish life taken needlessly. Bobby Sands' death led to yet another huge emotional ground swell inside the Catholic community. A ground swell which didn't necessarily go towards Republicans, but certainly it went against the British.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work