• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday - How useful are sources A,B,C and D to someone trying to find out the truth about the situation in Northern Ireland in January 1972 before "Bloody Sunday"?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Bloody Sunday 1. How useful are sources A,B,C and D to someone trying to find out the truth about the situation in Northern Ireland in January 1972 before "Bloody Sunday"? Explain your answer using sources A - D and your own Knowledge Source A portrays the Irish as barbaric monsters and is highly bias towards the English. This is fairly obvious as the illustrator of this particular cartoon is in fact English but never the less the propaganda from England at that time made the Irish out to be mere Frankenstein's monsters this was most probably done to provide a reason for such unnecessary blood shed on innocent people. It is interesting how the Irishman is so big and powerful in this source where as in real life the English troops really held all the cards they called all the shots. It is also fascinating how the Irish man is dressed in rags and has a menacing look and the English man is elegantly dressed and seems to be warning the monster off. Other than the symbolism of Frankenstein's monster there is also the issue of the rise of the Fenians a beginning of terrorism due to home rule issues under glad stone and the Phoenix park murders. ...read more.


Does this mean that these sources are of no use as evidence about Bloody Sunday? Explain your answer using Source F and G and your own knowledge. The fact that the sources do not agree with each other does not at all mean that they are not useful it is just what happened from another person's perspective. The statement from the commander is most definitely a bias report because he would not want it to seem that his Battalion opened fire for no reason whatsoever. The commander claimed that the demonstrators started the shooting and the Army was only protecting themselves. There is no way of telling whether Father Bradley's account is true either because he is a Catholic so he is bound to take his parishioners side. The priest argued that the demonstration was completely non violent and he saw no intimidating behaviour from the Catholics and there was absolutely no reason or explanation for the British army's actions that day. It is hard to say that one of the sources is right and the other completely wrong although they both contrast different opinions of what happened that day. If there was a completely neutral eyewitness account I am sure that it would be more useful than both of these sources. ...read more.


Source G are comments made by Father Bradley, a Catholic priest, this source is also very one sided as the priest is a Catholic and he is talking about how the attack was completely unprovoked and how the British armies violence was disgusting. Source H is very useful as it is from an English newspaper reporter's point of view who opposes the actions of the army he says that the shooting was unnecessary as there was no violence or threat towards the army. Source I and J are of no particular help as they do not identify any further evidence to what may have happened that day. Source K is interesting although bias as it is the view of the Londonderry City Coroner about the 13 deaths his feelings were that the actions of the army were of "sheer unadulterated murder," as there is no justification for shooting innocent people because of a parade that was banned. In conclusion I think it is possible to draw an accurate judgement from these sources to what happened on Bloody Sunday, in my opinion the Irish were not completely innocent but there was truly no need to kill more than a dozen innocent civilians because of a parade that was banned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Free essay

    Bloody Sunday

    The trial came to the conclusion that the marchers might have been carrying weapons. This lead to more hate from the Catholics and a rise in the number of IRA members. Then in 1998 a second was set up, this time it was called the Saville enquiry.

  2. Bloody Sunday

    * Inform the public of their lawful rights. I will now explain the events of the day The march was planned to start at 2:00pm from The Creggan. However the march left late at 12:50 pm approximately from Central drive in the Creggan Estate and took an indirect route tawards the bogside area of the city.

  1. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    * The disbanding of the B specials. The Protestants were suspicious of the Civil Rights Movement. They suspected the IRA may be involved. The Unionists got the RUC to stop one of their marches and this led to serious rioting. In the end the British troops were sent over to Northern Ireland to try and keep order.

  2. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    On June 15 a huge IRA bomb exploded in Manchester city centre, although nobody was killed, hundreds were injured. The Irish government therefore announced that it would have to re-evaluate its relationship with Sinn Fein, and backed Britain's insistence on a permanent IRA ceasefire.

  1. Explain why Bloody Sunday Happened.

    But the Nationalists (Catholic) were in favour of home rule and wanted to be separate from Britain. This started to be the threat of civil war. As a result of the Anglo-Irish Treaty-1921- Ireland was Partitioned. The 6 countries of Northern Ireland remained part of the UK.

  2. Northern Ireland - source related questions and answers

    Do sources H and I support Ian Paisley's view of the civil rights movement given in source G? Explain your answer by references to all three Sources. It is not completely clear who was involved with whom during the civil rights marches.

  1. Why Did ‘Bloody Sunday’ Take Place? (Russian History Sources Question)

    However, he doesn't mention any reason why the workers and peasants have gone on strike. He also mentions that "troops had to open fire in several places in the city; there were many killed and wounded". Yet he still doesn't mention why the workers were on strike.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    be more useful in informing the historian of the Tsar's opinion of 'Bloody Sunday'. The historian would also need to look at other primary sources to compare how the day was portrayed and so get a better idea of what went on - a contrasting example would be Father Gapon's diary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work