• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Mark Walker 10sws Coursework Assignment: "Bloody Sunday" 30 January 1972 1. Sources A to C are not very useful to somebody that wants to find out the truth about the situation in Northern Ireland in January 1872 before "Bloody Sunday". This is because they are all drawn by either an Irish or an English person. For example, source A must have been drawn by an English man because it shows a well dressed man - English and a giant man - Irish who looks like a peasant, holding a knife at the English man. This drawing is titled "The Irish Frankenstein" and because the English hated the Irish at the time so the Irish man is shown in an evil and dominating way. Also if this cartoon was shown to English people at the time then they would have believed it and this could be a factor in the reasons that cause the English hate for the Irish. Source B is an advertisement for a film; it is called "The Ultimate in Psychopathic Horror the Irish". Under this title there are the names of several Irish terrorist organisations - IRA, INLA, UDF, UDA, etc. Because of this biased view against the Irish and English person must also have drawn this as once again it shows the Irish as being very evil and bad people. ...read more.


The reporter doesn't only say that the English opened fire first, he says that they opened fire on the crowds of innocent people. As the reporter's comments are blaming his own country for the problems on "Bloody Sunday" this article has to be a very reliable piece of evidence. However it is possible that the reporter doesn't agree with what the British Army were doing in Northern Ireland, therefore has written the article in the IRA's favour and doesn't like the British Government. 4. Sources G and H give different interpretations of the actions of the British Army on "Bloody Sunday". Source G say that all soldiers that spotted armed gunmen shot them in accordance with the standing order in the Yellow Card and that each soldier had to judge whether or not he had seen a gunman. He also says that there were some soldiers that fired at lots of people and some that didn't fire many times at all. Source G was from the Widgery Report, a special investigation ordered by the British Government after "Bloody Sunday" On the other hand, source H says that the army shot without thinking of what they were doing. They shot innocent people, even if they were part of a parade that had been banned but that didn't justify the firing of live rounds indiscriminately. ...read more.


It says, "At one end of the scale, some soldiers showed a high degree of responsibility: at the other, firing bordered on reckless". This means that some soldiers were responsible about what they shot and some just shot anything. However Sources C, E and H are written by Catholics and blaming Protestants. Source C is a picture of English soldier's interrogation innocent Irish people. The English are shown this way because it shows them as bullies to the Irish and this would cause more Irish people to hat the English Protestants. Source E is an eyewitness account made by Father Bradley, a Catholic priest. He says that "Bloody Sunday" was a massacre. He says that he saw nobody shooting at the English soldiers but they just kept shooting indiscriminately. Finally Source H includes comments made by the Londonderry City Coroner, at the inquest into the 13 deaths. It says that the British Army was shooting innocent people in the parade. But even though the parade was banned the Coroner didn't feel that the shooting was justified. In conclusion I think that these sources can be used as evidence to find out the truth about what happened on Bloody Sunday if they are all used together. If analysed separately then they can be used to find out what the relationship between the Catholics and Protestants was like, and what they thought of each other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Sunday January On 30, 1972, in an incident since known as Bloody Sunday, twenty-seven ...

    He asked for the march to be allowed to take place without military interference. This was down to General ford who put Derik Wilford, commander of 1st Battalion Parachute regiment in charge of the planned arrest procedure. The next day on the 25th of January general ford put Andrew Maclellan

  2. Northern Ireland Troubles Sources Questions

    In 1960 the New Unionist Government promised reforms, when nothing had changed by 1967 civil rights marches began, they carried on until 1968. Tensions were escalating and in October 1968 fighting broke out between the Catholics and Protestants. Question 6 The Reverend Ian Paisley, speaking in Source K, believes that

  1. Northern Ireland - source related questions and answers

    Although it is definite the IRA was involved with certain political groups there were also so many other groups involved with the same groups it is not possible to pinpoint the blame to one group. Michael Farrell, a member of NICRA, says that "there was a number of Republicans and

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    It would be quite useful to the historian to compare the two sources, as they are both primary sources but show the event in different ways. b) Study sources C and D How far does source D agree with the impression of the marchers given in source C?

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    Members of the green jackets and the parachute regiment used barbed wire to close off the bench, which stopped the march. When they saw that the marchers were going around the wire they shot rubber bullets into the crowd. Many witnesses claimed that the paratroopers brutally beat a number of protesters.

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    The marchers could see this as a great opportunity in terms of propaganda, to make the Army look like murderers and rally support against them and support for the IRA. They saw the Army as not a peace force but an occupation force and felt that they needed to rid themselves of these invaders.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Civil rights lawyers accused the government of torture. The Irish government made a formal complaint to the European Commission for Human Rights and later the European Court of Human Rights. The Commission found Britain guilty of torture but the European Court ruled that the treatment was inhuman and degrading but did not constitute torture.

  2. I.R.A. Sources Questions

    The late 1970's and early 80's saw the real emergence of Sinn Fein the political wing of the IRA with the same aims. Republican prisoners in the Maze prison demanded to be treated as political prisoners rather than criminals. Several went on hunger strike in protest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work