• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Both The Bolshevik Revolution and the subsequent society created by the Bolshevik

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Both The Bolshevik Revolution and the subsequent society created by the Bolshevik, were communist. Asses the validation of this view. The Bolshevik revolution and the society made by it, were not communist. Yes there Revolution was communist, but the society that was created was not communist, This is due to the fact that a civil war started after Russia pulled out of the war, and had to change to War Communism. War communism is when the Bolshevik had to implement new laws in order to keep the country afloat, But on the other hand, the Bolshevik did try, as they gave more power to the people. ...read more.

Middle

order for people to survive, But on the other hand after the Civil war had ended all the War communism laws were either abolished or changed, and the Banning of private trade was abolished and trade restarted and the black marked closed and trade went back to normal. On the other hand they did try to be communist, as they gave factories and land to the people, and let them do and run it as they will, this allowed workers to select there own boss, and farmers to grow what ever they like and not have to pay rend on land. ...read more.

Conclusion

Small businesses reopened, This allowed private owners to start up little business, but this is not communist due to the fact that they would be making lots of money but would not employ many people so kept the money for them self and not support anyone else. But the after a while, so much food was flooding the cities that they had to reduce prices to sell it, but this made the producers reluctant to sell there grain as they were making less from the money, but the price of industrial goods rose because there was such high demand, But Bolshevik did react on this by reducing the price on industrial materials, and making the peasants pay tax in cash to encourage them to start trading again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is an accurate response but it is lacking in detail. The author could have strengthened it considerably by noting dates and the official names of policies like the NEP and Land Decree and by being clearer about what a communist state would look like in the introduction. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    He used propaganda once again to preach the public that industrialisation was patriotic, this encouraged workers to work for their motherland and to help their motherland to come up through the ranks and be part of the industrialisation process. Stalin removed Trotsky, the Left party the Right Party were in

  2. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    But in 1917 a great bulk of the peasantry was still commune governed, though agrarian reform intended at removing this was progressively spreading. It is likely if the movement had continued it would have resulted in the formation of a substantial class of farmers, but was interrupted by the war and revolution.

  1. What were the causes and consequences of the 1905 revolution?

    The Army despite some mutinies stayed loyal, and the use of non-Russian troops against Russian mutineers helped to achieve this. The true nature of Russia's social and political problems, which the Revolution of 1905 had highlighted, was not addressed.

  2. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    The view of recent historians is much more open to the idea that the October revolution was both a popular revolution and a coup d'�tat. In conclusion, I think that the October Revolution was both a coup d'�tat and a popular uprising.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    As defeat piled on defeat and the number of casualties increased, Russian government began to lost support of the people. In the midst of all these difficulties, Nicholas II made a terrible mistake; in September 1915, he decided to take over the running of the war and to go to the war front himself.

  2. The Causes of the October Revolution

    The First World War was the first time that Russia had been involved in since the French had invaded in 1812. In this war Russia had lost three million me, millions were starving back home because all industry was focused on the war effort, the winning of the war seemed impossible.

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    Acton argues that things had not changed a great deal after 1905 and because of this the government was still not conforming enough to please its people. Also through saying that the fundamental causes were still present Acton seems to be taking a view similar to Alan Wood's, suggesting that

  2. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia?

    caused a number of deaths by confusing a number of Ukrainians who misread a Cholera sign and then drank infected water. Also, Polish students were forced to study Polish Literature texts in Russian to ensure these laws were followed. This increase in discontentment among the national minorities within Russia was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work