• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Britain in the age of total War - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Neeraj Shah 28/09/03 HISTORY COURSEWORK Britain in the age of total War 1. The caption at the top of this source is very helpful in determining the usefulness of this source, because it tells us that this source was written by the publisher of the book, "Waiting for the All Clear", on the inside cover. Usually, this part of the book is used for advertising and commercial purposes, and so is not very useful in finding out about the response of the British people to the effects of the Blitz. This is because it contains no historical fact and is totally comprised of opinion. It makes suggestions that cannot be proven, like "out of terror and tragedy came courage". It tells us of courage, but courage cannot be measured, or recorded as data on paper, so it is virtually impossible for a publisher, writing fifty years after the event, to know for sure that the British people felt courage. The caption also tells us that this book was published to "celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the Blitz" and this is exactly what this source does. It is nostalgic, looking back at the Blitz and remembering the positive points of it. The only problem is, there does not seem to be any negative issues here, and portrays the Blitz as a time of happiness and unity, but does not mention anything else. This is why this source is not very useful, because it does not portray an accurate picture of the effects of the Blitz on the British people, as it does not provide a full account of it. What this source does suggest, is that there was a section of society that were more courageous than some of their counterparts, in other words, it suggests that the British people showed more courage than the people of other countries, but even this does not have any proof to back it up. ...read more.

Middle

This meant that defences against the night raids were very poor, but what annoyed the people more was the fact that they could not feel safe at all, because there were not enough shelters for everyone. Knowledge of the fact that they could be killed at any moment will surely have upset the people, and severely affected morale. We are told in Source E, that as an alternative to shelters, people started going to "Euston and Paddington" which are underground train stations, where they felt they would be safe. The government had outlawed this because it was very dangerous when the lines were still active, but the people ignored the government, which again shows how people had begun taking the law into their own hands and had lost respect for the government, a justifiable reason to be concerned. There must have been a reason for this sudden loss in respect for the government, and it seems that it was due to a sudden loss in morale of the British people due to the direct consequences of the bombing, which were upsetting and frightening the people. The main problem the government faced was the fact that they were not ready to defend against the different types of bombs and they did not know what to expect. Each type of bomb had a different effect, which meant that the public could not relax and stayed worried and eventually, as we see in Source G, it led to "flights of entire communities into the countryside, or 'trekking' as it was called". If the people were worried and frightened, they were upset, and if they were upset, then morale would drop. This is why the government were very concerned in the autumn of 1940. What also left people very upset was that the government had not prepared for the amount of homelessness, and when there are incidents like Clydebank, where twelve thousand homes were destroyed, it is obvious that morale would drop, as people would not be happy without homes to live in. ...read more.

Conclusion

sources is that Source A is a commemorative and celebratory extract and therefore would omit any negative comments and we have no proof that the people in Source C have not been told to stand like that; merely a piece of morale-boosting propaganda set up by the government, and therefore these two sources are very unreliable and cannot be used. I think that to fully agree or fully disagree with the statement that the British faced the blitz with courage and unity is a myth is not correct as both are very extreme views, and what would be correct is to say that they did not face it with cowardice and disunity, but also that it was not a time where everyone held hands and took the Blitz with smiling faces. A man from Swansea's comments reflects this and shows what the true picture was like. He said, "People were marvellous - they can take it all right. But not like the bloke said on the wireless - they don't go about smiling about it - the people who have lost friends and relatives. They don't go about grinning." Also there was a sense of grim determination amongst the people. They were saying things like "we shall get used to it". This suggests that they were not enjoying it but that they were dealing with it. I believe that the people felt that the Blitz wasn't a bed of roses, but they did keep on going. This is illustrated in Source G where it tells us that although the people were frightened so much that they used to 'trek' to the countryside every night, they still came to work every morning. This shows that they were frightened, but they were also trying their best and acting very brave. So, no I do not agree with this statement, but I also do not disagree because there is a lot of evidence to suggest that even though the people were frightened, they still kept on going. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    history coursework question 5 the blitz

    4 star(s)

    the government and so this makes what he writes more believable and accurate as it was a firsthand account. In Source C, we see a photograph which had been published during the height of the blitz. It shows injured civilians but they are carrying on.

  2. GCSE History The Blitz C/W

    This is called censorship. Also there were instances where the government reported that things had happened well when really they hadn't. An example of this is in Britain's "darkest hour" after Dunkirk. You'll find reports of brave small ships, a gallant rescue, and the return of the heroes.

  1. Battle Of Britain - The Popular Myth

    The article is propaganda designed to encourage support for the war and boost the morale and will of the British public not to lie down but to keep going until Hitler has been defeated. The Express was widely read and held in high regard so would not do not do

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    There are some other reasons why women did not get the vote by 1914 that are not mentioned in the two sources. To start with, not all the men had the vote; about 1/6 did not have it. There was no way that women would ever have been prioritised above men at this time.

  1. The Derby 1913 - source related study.

    Emmeline Pankhurst, the founder of the Suffragettes, and someone who would hold a totally bias opinion, writes source D many propaganda material, with the contents based on truth, but exaggerated to the extreme, " Breaking through the barriers," when in fact she merely ducked underneath the white pole dividing her from the racing horses.

  2. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    This dealt a serious blow to the success of assimilation. Britain's poor white population was a target of false propaganda and politicians like Enoch Powell persuaded them that immigrants were the cause for their problems. Enoch Powell's river of blood speech was recently used by the BNP a racist group who doesn't believe in immigrants and assimilation.

  1. (Grade A) Blitz coursework.doc

    In source D it shows people arguing over their property after a bomb raid, which had scattered their belongings all over the street. One of them appears to be taking advantage of the destruction caused by the bomb raid to steal from someone else, which eventually led to this conflict.

  2. Windsor Coursework

    allows resident to visit the attractions 3 times a year for free. Even though tourist may feel its unfair as they have to pay the expensive cost to enter an attraction I feel it is fair as residents should benefit from something since they are living there.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work