• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britian In the second World War - The Evacuation Of the British Children -sourcebased questions

Extracts from this document...


Coursework Assignment Model A British history Briton In the second World War The Evacuation Of the British Children Which Source is most important/useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? B or C? Source B and source C both relate with each other in the way that source B is a photograph and source C describes the same event. The both appear to be true and useful. Source B is a photograph of evacuees on the way to a train station walking from their local school, in London, sometime around September 1939. The photograph shows the children carrying their belongings and anything they might need on the journey with their teachers and they are all waving and smiling. ...read more.


Source C is an interview which was done in 1988 with a school teacher that took part in the evacuation. (Immediately you can notice that it was done well after the photograph was produced. From the interview we can see that the school teach took note of the fact that some mothers were very upset, some ok with it in the hope f that they would see their child again, and some mothers casting away their child. This source seems reliable because it is an interview with someone who was there at the time, so instead of a photograph which could well be fake, the interview seems to be true and real in the fact that, why would the teacher make up a story or lie about things which have happened? ...read more.


It doesn't show how some of the children saw the evacuation as an adventure/trip/holiday and that not every child disliked it, Which is a weakness in this source. I think that both of the sources are useful in their own way. Source B (photograph) shows how the children enjoyed being evacuated to the countryside. Or at least that's what the photograph was made to look like. And Source C explains how the children/parents acted towards the evacuation. Both sources could be fake, but I believe that both of them are real to a certain extent that it gives an impression of what certain people wanted you to think about the evacuation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. In what ways were people's lives affected by evacuation during the second world war?

    Some formed long term relationships with one another and kept in touch after the war. However there were tensions in some households due to town and country divisions. Many of the mothers from the country found it hard to be sympathetic to the city mothers who couldn't all sew or

  2. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    Source E, by a host remembering evacuation, says, "The children went round urinating on the walls. Although we had two toilets they never used them." Also, Source A says that the children were often bad mannered and had head-lice. Even the government admitted that they've "been a handful", in their propaganda advertisement in Source H.


    So in conclusion, both sources are not completely useful in showing the effects of the Blitz on people in Britain because each has its limitation. Source B only shows a small area that could have been a major hit, but it might not have been hit like that throughout the entire country.

  2. industrial revoltuion in britian

    Coal production became a huge revolution, even though the mines were one of the most dangerous places, workers would come out with all sorts of injuries. The roofs of the mines easily would cave in on the workers. Men, Women & children worked within the mines, the children's job roles

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Source D is quite similar to source A as both sources show a positive attitude to evacuation. Both the sources show happy smiling children giving the impression that children had fun when they were evacuated. The sources are also similar because they both show children being evacuated with friends or family.

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    Also a lot of people in built up areas lived in terraced housing or flats and didn't have a garden to build shelters in. Evacuating the children of Britain to safer parts of the country would be a more likely way of protecting them from both the bombing and the horrifying scenes of bombing.

  1. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The source shows us that the government were panicking. The attitude of the source is that evacuation is a positive thing for all involved; the children are "healthier and happier" whilst, the "foster-parents" are "doing a real service for the nation".

  2. History Coursework - Evacuation Assignment

    It is an extract from an interview with a teacher in 1988, who was an evacuee herself. It is useful to a historian as it uses hindsight, and also is from a personal viewpoint. The source tells us how the teacher remembers her experience of evacuation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work