• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By 1914, who had the greater success, Irish Nationalists or Ulster Unionists?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

By 1914, who had the greater success, Irish Nationalists or Ulster Unionists? The question of the division of Ireland between the predominantly Protestant North and the Catholic South is a long-standing, deep seated and highly complex issue which still continues to be controversial to this day. There have been many attempts to resolve the problems in order to restore peace to this small island, however none have been found. The Irish Nationalists and the Ulster Unionists both had powerful reasons for fighting their own cause, and both sides claimed small victories towards their ultimate goal over the years but 1914 was a year when the balance could have been tipped one way or the other if it had not been for the advent of World War I. The northern part of Ireland had, by the 16th century, become populated by a large number of Presbyterian Protestants, from Scotland who had a hatred of Popery and Catholicism. The whole of Ireland was, and had been since the 12th Century, part of the British Empire, and therefore expected to be loyal to the British King, who was also the Head of the Anglican Church. Ireland was also predominantly ruled and owned by wealthy Protestant landowners. The vast majority of Irish people were Roman Catholic and the British government was highly suspicious of their connection and possible preferred loyalty to Rome. ...read more.

Middle

Their aims were the same, an improvement of the standard of living and an end to the Act of Union, but they dreamed of total Independence for Ireland. Historically, the British government had responded to violent threat in the past, so the Fenians adopted a new, hostile approach, in order to get the attention of the government and be listened to. This was the first time that Irish violence reached English shores, deaths of both police and civilians in Manchester and London the consequence. As a result of the great famine, many farmers turned away from agriculture and took up sheep farming. Many people who had lived on the land were evicted, and roamed, starving around the country looking for work. Once the tenants were evicted, wealthier people took over and paid higher rents. The Land League started as a protest against these evictions. Its first president was Charles Stuart Parnell, accepting the presidency on the condition that the protests of the Land League should be above all, peaceful. He advocated shunning the new tenants of the farms from which people had been evicted, this became known as boycotting. The Land League became increasingly violent, as peaceful methods failed to produce results, and atrocities were committed in their name. Ireland was by this time, close to anarchy. Parnell was by now, the Irish leader in Westminster and made Home Rule the main policy of the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1914, Ireland was firmly split into two camps, the nationalist Irish Volunteers and the unionist Ulster Volunteer Force. The situation became so tense that Asquith had to act quickly to diffuse the situation. He proposed that the North would remain part of the United Kingdom, and the South would be granted Home Rule. Both sides reluctantly agreed to this compromise. With the imminent threat of World War I in July 1914, it was further agreed to suspend Home Rule until the war was over, which was confidently predicted to be by Christmas of that year. History now reveals how this was far from reality, and once again, the Nationalists, seemingly so close to achieving the goal of Home Rule that they had fought so long and hard to attain, were once again defeated. Throughout the majority of the 19th Century, the Nationalists seemed to have the upper hand in grabbing the political attention, and forcing successive Home Rule bills to be heard in parliament. The large number of Irish Nationalist MPs always meant that the government of the day needed their political support. However, despite this, and although they came very close to achieving their aim in 1914, they were never able to fulfil their ardent wish for Home Rule or Independence. The Union, both political and commercial between Ulster and Britain was too strong a bond to be broken, and ultimately, the Ulster Unionists held onto their links with Britain, and therefore achieved the greatest level of success. Helen Herzberg Page 1 13/1/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    The republic was proclaimed, but the rising was a disaster. Only a few of the Irish Volunteers actually showed up, and they were far outnumbered by troops and police. The population were indifferent or openly hostile, and by the time the fighting had finished, Dublin was in ruins.

  2. What are the main differences between Republicans / Nationalists and Unionists / Loyalists?

    set up to form a new government; only democratic parties would be involved in talks; the British government would only accept the unity of Ireland with the consent of those in the north; the Irish government accepted that amendments would be made to its constitution which claimed Ulster as part of its territory.

  1. How far do these sources support the veiw that Irish Nationalism was a 'curious ...

    In evaluating the sources it is clear that they do not give a clear answer to the question. For example source 5 is a very powerful source in the sense that it clearly shows where the popular support was. However we are limited to the results of the elections between

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    when they set out. And that I see as huge progress. And that I see as learning from other peace processes. People like Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness have gone through their own very painful form of political odyssey. They have gone down a very long road where they believe in simplistically that you could win this militarily.

  1. Ireland's incredible economic success has left many countries in complete fascination.

    Aimed at eliminating British control of Irish industry the Control of Manufacturers Act was also abolished8. Lemass aimed to attract direct foreign investment to Ireland, in particular in the manufacturing sector. This policy proved extremely successful as successive governments for over 40 years consistently followed it.

  2. How Effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders advance their Cause in the years ...

    to cooperate in any way or even speak to a landlord who was deemed to have acted unjustly. Parnell was imprisoned for inciting the boycotts. Eventually the struggle was largely resolved when Gladstone pushed through the Act of 1881, which was a major concession as it gave tenants the so-called

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Indeed, their 1848 rebellion exemplifies this as it was merely a series of skirmishes with the police. Thus, F.S.L. Lyons argues the rebellion displayed "romantic idealism totally out of touch with the world of reality". Kee sees Young Ireland as ineffective because they lacked mass support: while people may have

  2. "Why were Ulster Unionists so determined to resist home rule for Ireland in the ...

    This lead to the phrase "Home Rule means Rome Rule" being used by the Protestants, meaning if Home Rule was passed the country would be ruled by the Catholics. All of this obviously gave Ulster a valid reason to be so determined to resist home rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work