• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"By the beginning of 1929, the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic looked good." Discuss the extent to which this statement can be agreed with.

Extracts from this document...


"By the beginning of 1929, the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic looked good." Discuss the extent to which this statement can be agreed with. The statement that by the beginning of 1929 the survival prospects of the Weimar republic looked good brings many different political, economic and social views of the events and attitudes of that year and the 4 years (from 1924) leading up to it to a head. This essay will argue that while the statement can be evidenced by several improvements in different sectors, these improvements were only on the surface. If the fundamental flaws of the republic (exhibited in destabilizing factors to be discussed) are looked at accurately, its failures were inevitable. The great depression merely accelerated this inevitability. One argument that that supports the idea that survival prospects of Weimar looked good by 1929 is economic. The terror that the German people felt when faced with reparations was to be allayed by foreign minister Gustav Stressemans orchestration of the introduction of the Dawes plan in1924 (tailored to his policy of fulfillment of the Versailles treaty). The newly establish Rentenmark currency was stabilized by this influx of almost 25.5 billion marks worth of foreign capital. ...read more.


Another argument that supports the idea that the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic is political. In the early years of the republic leading up to 1923 there were no less than seven coups, and the challenges faced by the republic from the right (in Bavaria, where the army swore allegiance to the general and not the republic) as well as from the left (the spartacist uprising). The years after this (1924-29) were comparatively stable, with no major coups to speak of. In addition to this, Democratic Party majority in parliament had increased from 52% in May 1924 to 735 in May 1928. The election of Hindenburg as president in 1925 can also be seen as a positive step towards eventual cohesion of political systems, as the perception of him as a traditionalist was an assurance to conservatives that the Republic would protect their interests. Thus it can be seen why it can be argued that apparent political stability by 1929 contributed to the impression that the prospects of the Weimar Republics survival were good, and that had the depression of 1931 not occurred these political positives would have continued. However, with every positive comes a negative, and there are many historians with the belief that such arguments are superficial and ignorant of the very real (and evidenced) ...read more.


Workers were alienated economically also, with financial minister Bruning's harsh tax laws continued implementation (a move put into action with the noble goal of improving the economy following the hyperinflation of 1923).Agricultural production was hindered greatly by falling food prices, and the tough times faced by farmers and rural people were ripe for other solutions (which they found, as shown in the jump in the communist KPDs' rural membership by 10% in 1928). It can be seen that by 1929, all was definitely not positive economically and that this would not mean well for the prospects of Weimar's' survival, even with out The Great depression of 1931. In conclusion, it can be seen that while there were some positive economic, political and foreign policy developments from 1924 to 1929, these were merely on the surface and covered innumerable flaws in the Weimar system. The lack of understanding of democracy in German society, the negative perceptions and revisionist ideals leftover from the Versailles Treaty and the structurally induced economic weaknesses were all evident throughout the time period, and would have caused the republic eventual downfall. The great depression of 1931, while it sped up this process, was merely a catalyst. ?? ?? ?? ?? 5/8/2007 Isabel Marden ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    This helped to muffle theoretical discussions which might deflect the party from its true purpose, the seizure of power." AJ Nicholls "[This] was nothing but a move to solidify Hitler's authoritarian leadership structure." 5. The Strassers Gregor and Otto Strasser were Nazi leaders based in northern Germany.

  2. 'By the Beginning of 1929, the prospects for the survival of the Weimar Republic ...

    This is proven as; between 1924-28 there were six changes in government. This meant that the survival of the Weimar Republic didn't look good because it just wasn't strong enough. The 1928 elections gave the Weimar Republic a boost as the percentage of people who wanted parties that were committed

  1. 'By the beginning of 1929, the prospectsFor the survival of the Weimar republicLooked good', ...

    After the Dawes plan (1924), Germany was not under as much severe pressure and economic strain of the reparations payments, and this along with the economic boost from American investments helped Germany to finance a long term industrial revolution which created mass industry in Germany.

  2. "By the beginning of 1929, the prospects for the survival of the WeimarRepublic looked ...

    In 1928 industrial production exceeded pre-war levels and exports were 40% higher than they had been in 1925. Unemployment was also low at a figure of 6.2%. In addition Stresemann made sure that the Rentenmark was issued in strictly limited quantities ensuring that the economic crisis of hyperinflation would not occur again.

  1. How Stable Was the Weimar Republic Between 1925 and 1929?

    This is further verified if we look at 1926-28 where the returning vote for mainstream pro-Weimar parties, at the expense of the anti-republican right, indicates lack of economic turbulence and a stable situation. It is not just at home in Germany that we can look at, the Stresemann years of

  2. To what extent had the Weimar Republic achieved political, economic and social stability by ...

    The Weimar republic's greatest weakness was its failure to establish lasting political stability. I. Kershaw once said that, ?a stable coalition is an oxymoron?. Germany's prosperity after 1924 was financed for the most part by borrowed money. The basic weakness was that the government was using short term loans to fund long term projects.

  1. Nazi Germany Revision 1918-45

    Hindenburg was persuaded ? Hitler became Chancellor on 30 Jan 1933. Nazi consolidation of power, 1933-34 Formation of government under Chancellor Hitler, 30 January 1933. Torch-light parades by SA. Belief among right-wing politicians that Hitler lacked political ability and could be controlled; the Nazi numbers in the Reichstag could then be used to govern more effectively.

  2. WWII History Revision Notes. How far did the Weimar Republic Recover between 1924-1928.

    28th February 1933 (Reichstag Fire Decree) Hitler persuaded Hindenburg to pass the Reichstag fire decree after the fire: 1. Political meetings were banned 2. Newspapers were banned 3. Political opponents were taken to concentration camps ? Nazi party were reducing opposition? Election in March 1933: Nazis gained 43.9% of the vote (288 seats)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work