• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"By the beginning of 1929, the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic looked good." Discuss the extent to which this statement can be agreed with.

Extracts from this document...


"By the beginning of 1929, the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic looked good." Discuss the extent to which this statement can be agreed with. The statement that by the beginning of 1929 the survival prospects of the Weimar republic looked good brings many different political, economic and social views of the events and attitudes of that year and the 4 years (from 1924) leading up to it to a head. This essay will argue that while the statement can be evidenced by several improvements in different sectors, these improvements were only on the surface. If the fundamental flaws of the republic (exhibited in destabilizing factors to be discussed) are looked at accurately, its failures were inevitable. The great depression merely accelerated this inevitability. One argument that that supports the idea that survival prospects of Weimar looked good by 1929 is economic. The terror that the German people felt when faced with reparations was to be allayed by foreign minister Gustav Stressemans orchestration of the introduction of the Dawes plan in1924 (tailored to his policy of fulfillment of the Versailles treaty). The newly establish Rentenmark currency was stabilized by this influx of almost 25.5 billion marks worth of foreign capital. ...read more.


Another argument that supports the idea that the survival prospects of the Weimar Republic is political. In the early years of the republic leading up to 1923 there were no less than seven coups, and the challenges faced by the republic from the right (in Bavaria, where the army swore allegiance to the general and not the republic) as well as from the left (the spartacist uprising). The years after this (1924-29) were comparatively stable, with no major coups to speak of. In addition to this, Democratic Party majority in parliament had increased from 52% in May 1924 to 735 in May 1928. The election of Hindenburg as president in 1925 can also be seen as a positive step towards eventual cohesion of political systems, as the perception of him as a traditionalist was an assurance to conservatives that the Republic would protect their interests. Thus it can be seen why it can be argued that apparent political stability by 1929 contributed to the impression that the prospects of the Weimar Republics survival were good, and that had the depression of 1931 not occurred these political positives would have continued. However, with every positive comes a negative, and there are many historians with the belief that such arguments are superficial and ignorant of the very real (and evidenced) ...read more.


Workers were alienated economically also, with financial minister Bruning's harsh tax laws continued implementation (a move put into action with the noble goal of improving the economy following the hyperinflation of 1923).Agricultural production was hindered greatly by falling food prices, and the tough times faced by farmers and rural people were ripe for other solutions (which they found, as shown in the jump in the communist KPDs' rural membership by 10% in 1928). It can be seen that by 1929, all was definitely not positive economically and that this would not mean well for the prospects of Weimar's' survival, even with out The Great depression of 1931. In conclusion, it can be seen that while there were some positive economic, political and foreign policy developments from 1924 to 1929, these were merely on the surface and covered innumerable flaws in the Weimar system. The lack of understanding of democracy in German society, the negative perceptions and revisionist ideals leftover from the Versailles Treaty and the structurally induced economic weaknesses were all evident throughout the time period, and would have caused the republic eventual downfall. The great depression of 1931, while it sped up this process, was merely a catalyst. ?? ?? ?? ?? 5/8/2007 Isabel Marden ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    This helped to muffle theoretical discussions which might deflect the party from its true purpose, the seizure of power." AJ Nicholls "[This] was nothing but a move to solidify Hitler's authoritarian leadership structure." 5. The Strassers Gregor and Otto Strasser were Nazi leaders based in northern Germany.

  2. 'By The Beginning of 1929, the prospects for the survival of the Weimar Republic ...

    Some governments only lasted three or four months. With all this change people are going to start to become irritated by the inability of the elite to hold government. This left the door open in 1929 for a dictatorship or a strong coalition to come into power however this door

  1. To what extent can the years 1924 – 1929 be described as “Golden” ones ...

    Compared to the War years and the years that followed, 1918-1923, then of course the years 1924-1929 seemed "Golden" to the German people. Yet to the rest of the world it was just a country picking itself back up and carrying on from where it let itself go into War.

  2. To what extent did the Weimar achieve financial and political stability in the 1920’s.

    For example in it's first four years the Weimar encountered a Spartacist revolution in 1919, the Kapp Putsch in 1920, the Munich Putsch in 1923 by Hitler and many Communist uprisings all in its infancy, all of these attempted uprisings were unsuccessful but they reflect the political unrest and instability inside Germany.

  1. How strong was Weimar Germany by the beginning of 1924

    In addition, in 1918, 293,000 people died from starvation and hypothermia. All was not well for the innocent members of the public in Germany. In 1923, opposition from the right was exposed when the events of the Munich Putsch took place.

  2. To what extent had the Weimar Republic achieved political, economic and social stability by ...

    The Weimar republic's greatest weakness was its failure to establish lasting political stability. I. Kershaw once said that, ?a stable coalition is an oxymoron?. Germany's prosperity after 1924 was financed for the most part by borrowed money. The basic weakness was that the government was using short term loans to fund long term projects.

  1. WWII History Revision Notes. How far did the Weimar Republic Recover between 1924-1928.

    blond hair, blue eyes) because they believed they were pure. People?s Germany (the Volk) They wanted all Aryan Germans to feel part of the community. [n] How did the Nazis Really Ran Germany? 1. The SS ran by Heinrich Himmler became very important in Nazi Germany during the 1930?s 1.

  2. Nazi Germany Revision 1918-45

    Storm troopers (SA) ? used to protect Nazi meetings, disrupt those of opponents, and march in processions. Key Nazis ? Rohm (1919), Goebbels (1922), Goering (1922), Himmler (1923). By 1923 the party had 3,000 members. Very vocal party. * Causes, events and consequences of the Munich Putsch, 1923.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work