• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By the end of the first world war British rule was still strong in India but this would not be the case for much longer. Many thousands of Indians fought in the first world war believing that in return they would be given home rule of their country

Extracts from this document...


Since 1858 the British government took over responsibility of governing India. Indeed they held a very dominant position as 60% of India was in their control and 40% was governed by the Indian princes. The princes ruled their land on the condition that they would except the main rulers of India were still be British and that they agreed to sign treaties with the British making them loyal supporters of the British Raj. India was directly ruled by the Viceroy who was appointed by the British parliament and a representative of the Monarch. Also the secretary of state for India was the government minister responsible for Indian affairs. ...read more.


The Indians seemed to benefit from the war as there was Huge demands for Indian cotton and other raw materials which led to arising employment. India desperately wanted reform and independence, but as time progressed the British realized the Indians desire for this and were not ready to give up ruling India easily. The British attitude to the Indians was clear, they expected "a certain standard or courtesy or politeness from the Indians and mixing only for official purposes." In order to please the Indians the Morley Minto reforms were passed which were brought about by the secretary of state for India and the viceroy as one of the many reforms giving greater representation to Indian. ...read more.


Furthermore there outbreaks of violence in Punjab which increased when no statement was made by the British government of home rule. Therefore lord Chelmsford and the second of state of India E.S Montagau recommended there should be reform in India, which became known as Montagau Chelmsford reform and practiced in the 1919 Indian act. Preceding this, was Rowlett acts were passed by commission as a solution on how the British government was losing control of the situation. The act extending the defence of Indian act into peacetime. The Indians were outraged by such steps which reconfirmed the British having ultimate control over Indians. There was no intention of self rule. So Rowlett acts were opposed by Indian men of imperial legislation council. The acts proud Montague Chelmsford reform were meaningless. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Causes of the First World War revision notes.

    to impact the population were Slavs, then to the Russian side wanted. The most important part, so that the Serbian Slavs emerged as an independent nation in 1878 Serbia was himself free from the empire of Austria. Still, many remained outside the Slavic region, who wanted to bring them to them.

  2. World War I Coursework

    The Germans used their submarines (the only boat that left the German docks) to begin a blockade of their own. They sunk British merchant ships, cutting off supplies to Britain. However, the British government came up with many ways of protecting the ships and ensuring that their people didn't starve.

  1. Questions on World War One.

    - Trieste and Istria, the Alpine frontier of 1810, and the Balkan littoral of the Adriatic. The first was provoked by her fear of France, the second by the view that the Italian speaking territories would be sooner incorporated into Italy in co-operation with Austria and Germany; rather than in opposition, against whose military she would clearly stand no chance.

  2. What were the main economic consequences of the First World War

    at the very least it was a major factor that has shaped the world that we live in today. The First World War completely shattered and devastated many European economies. In Germany alone the cost of the war was estimated at $40 billion USD1.

  1. Causes of the First World War

    People in the empire had its own customs and language and sought for independence. There was certainly no nationalism or patriotism. It also feared the support that Russia gave to the Serbs, but relied on its allies. The last country that formed the Central Powers, Italy, was not as strong

  2. "Dad's Army" - How much can you learn from these sources about the work ...

    This shows that the work the Home Guard did was recognised even at the highest level. From this we can see that the work of the Home Guard was organised and serious. Most of the work they did was land based and also fairly water based.

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    Many historians, politicians and journalists tend to place the blame on the British, and their poor organization. Historian's R. Ernest Dupuy and Trevor N. Dupuy said; "With the exception of the Crimean War, the Gallipoli Expedition was the most poorly mounted and ineptly controlled operation in British military history."12 In

  2. Revision notes - History of First World War and the Role of Women

    Black Hand: secret Serbian society 1. Black hand wanted to force Austria from Balkans 1. Franz Ferdinand (archduke of Austria) visited Sarajevo in Bosnia Herzegovina 1. At 11 o?clock, he was shot while in a carriage with his pregnant wife by Cavrilo Princip 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work