• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Jessica Hallett c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition? Prohibition was the banning of manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicating liquors. It became law in 1919, when temperance movements pressured Congress for the Eighteenth Amendment to the American Constitution. The Volstead Act of 1920 defined 'intoxicating liquors' as anything containing more than half a percent of alcohol. At the start of Prohibition, what with the enthusiasm and influence of both of the main temperance movements, the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Union, many people were very keen about it and were convinced that it would work and was going to last. Many important people had few doubts that Prohibition was going to be a success. These two sources were written by influential people and although this may have meant that the source itself was slightly biased, this doesn't make them useless. Source E was a letter written in 1932 by a wealthy industrialist, John D. ...read more.


This source also starts off with an optimistic approach and hope that Prohibition will work. As Prohibition Commissioner, he has some power and influence, and demands that "The law will be obeyed". He wants to make sure the law survives. "Where it is not obeyed, it will be enforced" "Liquor must not be manufactured. We shall see that it is not. Nor sold, nor given away". Kramer is a supporter of Prohibition and has no doubts about it. He is clearly determined to make this work and is definitely convinced that Prohibition will be a success. He is speaking in 1920, which is obviously just as Prohibition is starting up; The Eighteenth Amendment to the American Constitution was passed in 1919. This shows that he is almost ignorant and obviously doesn't know that Prohibition will turn out to be very unsuccessful. Both sources are fairly reliable but they have some big differences. Source E is more reliable as evidence for Prohibition because of the date it was written, being after Prohibition (the law was abolished in 1933). ...read more.


However, the source could be seen as biased, because of the fact that Rockefeller was a wealthy businessman who had a lot of power and could be making a false show of whether he cared or not. This letter was published on the front of the New York Times, which would obviously make a difference as to what he would write in it. In conclusion I think that Source E is far more reliable than Source F, mainly because of the date it was written, which is very significantly just before the very end of Prohibition meaning that everything has already happened and Rockefeller can talk about the reasons for and the consequences of Prohibition whereas, with Source F being before the majority of Prohibition has taken place, Kramer is ignorant to the consequences of Prohibition. Although he is far more keen and enthusiastic than John D. Rockefeller and was a Prohibition Commissioner, his determination is all in vain. In Source F, he demands that "the law will be obeyed", but we know now that the law wasn't obeyed and "crime...increased to a level never seen before" (Source E). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History - Prohibition

    This source shows that prohibition was expected to be a success but it was written before or just after the new law had been passed. It does not show the effects of Prohibition, only what was hoped would happen. Also, it does not show the corruption of many of the

  2. Prohibition - source related study.

    If this was common knowledge then prohibition could not have been a success, the enforcers should not have been taking bribes. As we know from hindsight this was fairly typical of the prohibition era- if the enforcers got a backhander, then they would leave that speakeasy/bootlegger alone, so paying bribes became like a council tax.

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    Another reason why prohibition was repealed was because of the anti prohibition groups. This included the National Association against the Prohibition Amendment (NAAPA) and Women's Organisation for National Prohibition Reform. These both tried very hard to get prohibition wiped out.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Therefore from what I have learnt about Prohibition, his account is most probably true but some of his claims would be difficult to prove. For example he does not quote specific examples of "some of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition."

  1. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    Source G shows statistics on how many illegal stills were seized and how many gallons of spirits were seized from the year 1921 to 1929. At first it seems like the prohibition agents were successful in enforcing prohibition with the number of seized stills rising from 9,746 in 1921 to

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    Source B is rather irrelevant as it has no reference to Al Capone or for that matter the supply of alcohol so it appears that this particular source doesn't agree with the fact that Capone is 'Public Enemy Number One' yet states that the problem is within the saloons themselves.

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    man is handing over his weeks wages for drink and not supporting his family. The picture in the bottom right emphasises this. It shows a woman and her little child with hardly any food to eat, as the money is being spent by the father on drink.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This infers how the saloon separates the family even more. The title is also provocative as it implies that the poor go there, but they use all their money there when it could be used to buy food for the family.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work