• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the Bombing of Hiroshima be Justified?

Extracts from this document...


On 6th August 1945, a silverplate Boeing B-29 superfortress flew over the densely populated Japanese city of Hiroshima. The plane, ?Enola Gay?, was carrying a highly radioactive atomic bomb containing the actinide Uranium-235. Hiroshima is the largest city in the Chugoku region of western Honshu, Japan?s largest island and used to be an embarkation port and industrial centre that was the site of a major military headquarters. The bomb, ?Little boy?, is estimated to have killed approximately 90,000 ? 166,000 people; around 30% of the population were killed instantaneously as their bodies were vaporised. Some bodies had viscera sucked out of them, while others were so badly mutilated from the effects of the bomb that it was hard to identify who was who. As always, there are two sides to every story. Many people argue that America?s actions were wrong; however the Americans believed that what they did was right. There are sources that both support and disagree with America?s action. In this essay I will explore these points and say why the bombing cannot be justified. Some people say that it was a justified decision to bomb Hiroshima. This is because America wanted revenge on Japan for Pearl Harbor. In an interview with James Byrnes, the American Secretary of State, 1965 he says, ?We were talking about the people who hadn?t hesitated at Pearl Harbor to make a sneak attack, destroying not only ships but also the lives of many American sailors.? The source suggests that the Japanese hadn?t shown the U.S. any mercy, so they wanted the Japanese to pay for their actions in the Pacific. ...read more.


There are other sources that back up this source, for example, source 11. This backs up what President Eisenhower said because it shows that the U.S. troops could have easily overwhelmed the Japanese army if they persevered and launched two or three attacks. They could have avoided destroying innocent Japanese lives; the soldiers on both sides signed up knowing they were probably going to die, but the civilians just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Japanese did not have enough resources, so the Americans would have certainly won. However, there are some sources that disagree with the source. For example, source 14. This challenges the source said by President Eisenhower because it is saying that the Japanese would fight to the death and there was no way the Americans could win when they were up against five million men and 5000 suicide aircraft which would never surrender. However this source was said by Henry Stimson, the American Secretary for war, which was the man who told Eisenhower about the U.S.?s plans to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. He would be biased as he would support the U.S.?s decision and he would advise Truman on the atomic bomb as he was the American Secretary for War. He was also against what President Eisenhower said to him and would want to come up with an excuse to drop the bomb. Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the opinion of the people surveyed that certainly prior to 31 December 1945 and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would ...read more.


However, the main reasons for this event are revenge and also they wanted to know exactly what the effect of the bomb would be on human life. If the U.S. had really wanted to, they could have not dropped the bomb. In hindsight, we can see that although it ended World War 2, it obliterated both buildings and people and the effects of the radiation are still clear to see 70 years on. There are still shadows on the street from where people were vaporised and some genetic aberrations have been passed down in some families; it can take hundreds of years or more for radiation to actually break down. It was not so much that the buildings were razed to the ground, but the catastrophic effect it had on human life. In some ways it can be justified, because it did save American lives, but at a cost, one that the civilians of Hiroshima had to pay dearly. Admittedly, it did make Japan vow to never participate in war again, but it brought the world into the radioactive age of the atomic bomb. Fortunately, no-one has used one since, but what if some Hitler-like psychopath happens to come into power and uses it against us? The bombing of Hiroshima probably seemed justified at the time, however 70 years on we can see it was unwarranted and could have been avoided. Japan were going to negotiate peace terms before the U.S. dropped the bomb, and the U.S. could have just used it on some barren desert island somewhere and then threatened to use it on the Japanese. Therefore, my verdict is that the bombing of Hiroshima cannot be justified because it caused suffering that could have otherwise been avoided. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was the atomic bombing of Hiroshima justified?

    Japan is an Island country which is relatively hard to attack but is also easy to be forced to surrender by cutting off all of their supplies, which was implied by one of the Japanese survivors at the end of the movie.

  2. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    victory against Japan so that the Russians could not claim any credit for the victory, because the Russians had began to invade Japanese territory. All of these factors are Russia-related reasons for the Americans to drop the bomb, showing that diplomacy with Russia was important to America; they were spurred

  1. " Individuals do not 'shape' historical events; the best they can do is to ...

    "one of these days the newspapers will dedicate their columns to the resurrection of this man who may be the Bolivar of our time." Once there was confirmation of Che's death in Bolivia, people began to speak of his failure as a revolutionary and began to place blame on the different aspects of Che.

  2. Atomic Bomb

    In addition, there was a naval blockade meaning the Japanese would not be able to trade, therefore being low on supplies, and thought the war would end by September. But some Americans didn't believe Japan would surrender because they wouldn't accept unconditional surrender and because they believed in Bushido, this

  1. Can nuclear energy be justified?

    the hands of major powers at present, are not safe and vulnerable to terrorist attacks which are the most controversial issues at the contemporary international world.-49 But in fact, today various weaknesses have been corrected. Containment vessels are designed to withstand extremes like earthquakes or a hit by a jumbo jet.

  2. What were the effects of the atom bomb

    The atomic bomb had an impact on military warfare. Within 3 weeks of the dropping of the bomb WW2 ended Japan signed a surrender aboard the USS Missouri although after 6 years of conflict the war would have been coming to and end because the supplies to Japan were cut

  1. Edexcel Cold War 1943-1991 Revision (Detailed)

    In October 1967 reformers challenged Novotny?s leadership. Dubceck invited Brezhev to prague. He withheld support for the Czech leader. January 5th 1968 Novotny was replaced as First Secretary of the Communist Party for Dubcek. Reforms soon came into place called ?socialism with a human face.? 1.

  2. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    what was happening in the world, hence the tragedy of Americas military intervention in Indochina - clear case of containment gone wrong. * Maintain strong enough military forces to resist any Soviet attack * Provide economic support to those countries that were poor so communism would seem attractive to their

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work