Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Causes and consequences of the English Civil War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The causes and consequences of the British wars. ?King Charles is totally to blame for this war.? How far do you agree with this statement? In my essay today we will be looking at the specific statement ?King Charles is totally to blame for this war.? The English Civil war officially began in 1642, during Charles`s reign. It was really the Royalists vs. the Parliamentarians. The Royalists were a large group of people who supported King Charles in every way. Parliamentarians were of course, the MP`s of Parliament. The two groups did not like each other, as there were many different arguments and disagreements on what the king should and shouldn?t do, and how he should run the country. We will be discussing the causes of the civil war going through these several different topics, money, religion, Scotland, Parliament and Charles. But what we also need to know, is the relationship between Charles and Parliament throughout Charles`s reign. Not just that, but others who may have caused the war. This argument can be answered both ways by either being wrong or right. Money played a massive role as to why Charles was to blame for the civil war. Money makes the world go round, doesn?t it? The more you have the more things you are able to accomplish. Charles was a King, but he started off with a little amount of it. Throughout the course of Charles`s reign, his money was decreasing rapidly. Louis XIII was a Catholic French King who at the time was in the middle of a civil war against Protestants. We will expand on this point further in the Religion section. ...read more.

Middle

His advisors did not really help his arguments, as some told him ways to make money illegally. Most of what Charles did was based around the advisors ideas. It was like Charles was becoming an easy target for parliament. Closing parliament more than once was not a good idea, as it did not show he was powerful, but that he was desperate. It was like he wasn?t trying to give any solid reasons as to why he shut down Parliament. It was literally like, you?re not listening to me go away. It was like 2 children on a playground. Also, in many points in time greed took over in Charles`s mind. These personalities ruined Charles`s image and this is where most of people hatred towards Charles came from. Having power meant having respect, as Charles?s power decreased so did his respect. Charles had realized Parliament was gaining power, but Charles believed they did not need. Charles believed strongly in ?Divine Rights?. Divine rights meant you were picked by God to be the Monarch. Why would Parliament need all of that power if God did not choose them. Back then, if you though the King was wrong you thought God was wrong, because had chosen him and God was always right, right? You were considered a bad Christian if you did not believe in Divine rights. Charles might have got out of trouble just by saying the term ?Divine Rights?. People did not like this to keep on happening, so people began to side to parliament Parliament was one of the topics I?d like to discuss. ...read more.

Conclusion

England was a Protestant Country, as it was ruled by Charles who was a Protestant. But people started to doubt the king?s beliefs when he married a Catholic woman named Henrietta Maria. June 13th 1625 was the wedding date; it was one of the most controversial marriages in history. Why did Charles marry a Catholic Woman? Maybe it was because he wouldn?t peace between the two religions. But others didn`t see it that way. It was a really unpopular marriage, as people did not want to be ruled by a Catholic Family. This was one of the points Parliamentarians could attack the king on. This is where people began to doubt the king. If they had children and were bought up by Catholics, which means the heir to the throne would be Catholic and every one would have to change their beliefs and thoughts. MP`s suspicion became greater once Charles introduced the Prayer book to Scotland. This was way too similar to the Catholics book for their liking. This had an instant effect on the Scottish when they saw what they were doing was similar to what Catholics did. This may have caused the civil as People did not want to be ruled by Catholics. To conclude I believe this statement is not entirely true. This is because it says Charles was ?totally? to blame for the war, but he was not as there were other causes. However, I would shift most of the blame towards Charles`s side, as he was the one who made the final decision. Re-reading my essay I believe I have made more points as to why Charles was to blame. BY AADIL IQBAL Why he was to blame- http://baconsblueblazer.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/who-was-to-blame-for-english-civil-war.html http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~sgood/leeryan2.html http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/english_civil-war.htm Nineteen Propositions- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Propositions ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What are the changing attitude of Australians towards war and peace?

    Conscription fueled protests as it affected everyone. It was people's sons; brothers, friends and relatives that were getting called upon to serve and that were killed involuntarily. Between 1965 and 1966 there was over eighty reported demonstrations of protest movements in Australia.

  2. Causes of the english civil war

    This was another long term cause. When Charles had come to the throne he was only granted a year of custom duties, causing a problem for money. Parliament had done this because they thought it would force Charles to call on parliament regularly, however this plan did not work as Charles continued to collect custom duties.

  1. What were the causes of Indian Independencein 1947, and was partition inevitable?

    The British brought phrasebooks and learnt rude and demeaning names, looking down on most Indian citizens. This made the Indian servants and population feel oppressed by the British, as if they were being treated badly. Although this was not a main cause towards independence, it was one of the many small factors which added up together and caused nationalism.

  2. English Civil War

    to a point when the MPs arrived at Parliament to find it locked up with large chains and padlocks.

  1. Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is ...

    This is a religious and personal cause. This is Charles fault because he decided to marry a catholic, Henrietta Maria. Charles the first inherited lots of beliefs and problems from his father, one of the beliefs that Charles believed in was the divine right of kings. This is where you believe that god has chosen you to

  2. To what extent was slavery the key cause of the American Civil War?

    to, 'Bleeding Kansas' You can see how western expansion caused a strong divide between North and South and simply fuelled hatred for one and other. The Missouri Compromise, 1850 compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 all delayed really, as long slavery existed, an inevitable face to face to solve the issue.

  1. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    killing people and blowing up buildings and the other silly things men have done when they wanted the law altered". Millicent Fawcett said that her movement was like a glacier; it might be slow-moving but it was a powerful force and unstoppable.

  2. What were the causes of the English Civil War?

    Whenever a bishop died he would replace him with a bishop that shared his views. By 1640, most bishops in England were Laudians although most people in England did not like the Laudian ideas at all. Laud believed that people should be allowed to enjoy themselves on Sundays.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work