• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is this statement true

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is this statement true Is Charles the first completely responsible for the civil war to break out, No, this statement is partially true, yes Charles did contribute to the war to break out, but he was not completely responsible, he started his reign really badly by marrying a French catholic, he had a lot of problems with parliament, this was inherited from his father James the First, Charles dissolves parliament and rules for 11 years between 1629 and 1640. In this period he introduces preposterous taxes, like ship tax to get money, he also introduced the court of Star Chamber 1635, with this court that he ruled, he took money from civilians, and furthermore if they refused they would get punished. On the other hand parliament had their contribution for the civil war to break out, firstly when Charles called the parliament back, the parliaments gave Charles some demands, these would reduce Charles's power. Then in 1641 the parliament asked for bishops power to be reduced, this was narrowly passed by a very close vote, then the parliament wanted no bishops,, then the last string was pulled, the parliament asked for 19 propositions, this outraged Charles and then the civil war broke out. Some historians say Charles was to blame, others say it was parliament, and others say that both were to blame, in this essay I will show you who is the real person to blame. ...read more.

Middle

then the Scots invaded northern England, they started to ask for 850 pounds a day to the king to stop them going any moving further south, Charles the first did not have this vast amount of money, so again in his desperation for money he recalls parliament hoping that they would compromise and give him the money, this parliament eventually lasted 20 years this is why it is called long parliament. The parliament had the upper hand when they last met, now they looked more superior than Charles in this certain situation. All the members of parliament were unified against Charles; at this point there was no question about the civil war due to no army that was on Charles' side. If parliament were to give money to the king, Charles would have to accept the terms and conditions. In November 1640 parliament released their demands, some of the most important ones were 'ministers should be appointed who will advise Charles, some of these ministers should be appointed by parliament' Charles hated this one. 'The king should get rid of court of Star Chamber' this meant that Charles could not get everything that he wanted and finally 'regular meetings should be held of parliament' this way parliament could keep control of the situations. I think all these demand are fair. Some of the important concessions made by Charles were 'parliament must meet every 3 years' this is very minimal amount of meetings, Charles did this so he could keep some power, 'Strafford has been tried for treason and executed' this made Charles furious that he had to kill his own advisor, he was forced to do this by parliament on may 1642. ...read more.

Conclusion

On 22nd of august 1642 the armies were ready to fight. This is all parliaments fault due to them being over greedy for power; they released these demands because they could no longer trust him due to Charles embarrassing himself when he tried to arrest 5 mp's Too much extent Charles was to blame, he made huge blunders, but it was not entirely Charles' fault, parliament had their share especially towards the end of the build up to the civil war, at the beginning they gave Charles money for only one year, forcing him to kill his advisor, seizing control over the army and most importantly the 19 propositions that pulled the last string, however Charles triggered a lot of these, he started absurd taxes, complications in religion, but most importantly he abused his power, this left him with absolutely no supporters. By trying to arrest 5 mp. The statement has a fair balanced motion, both parties to blame, Charles ruled without parliament for 11 years due to parliament doing bad things to trigger it off. Parliament asked some fair demands in November 1640 due to Charles having financial problems, Charles big blunder was when he tried to arrest 5 mp's because they criticised him, Charles abused his power too much but on the other hand parliaments big blunder was when they asked the 19 propositions, this made Charles lose all his power this was really unfair to chares the first. So I think the civil war ended up being both parties fault due to them being greedy for power. It is not fair saying it was one sides fault. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    Custer had other plans. He pushed his men hard and forced marches on them. His men marched for many hours without rest day and night. Eventually his troops became too fatigued. Along the way, Custer developed a short cut to the Little Bighorn.

  2. Gallic war

    * Added 480 million sesterces in war spoils to the war treasury. * Raised Rome's annual revenue from tribute by 70%. * East received peace/security for the future. * Pompey became a patron for the provincials in their dealings with Rome.

  1. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    It is estimated that there are over 600 examples, of which a few are shown in the following table: Latin Welsh Modern English furca ffurch fork/pitch-fork mola melin mill castellum castell castle oleum olew oil vinea givinwydden vine auctor awdur author There are many more such words; those given above are those which resemble the Latin equivalents most closely.

  2. To what extent did the Vikings deserve this bad press? How would you characterise ...

    is evidence to suggest that the raiders may have merely aimed to gain wealth and fertile land, which they had lacked in the Scandinavian Peninsulas. Not all Vikings lived a nomadic lifestyle; many were content to settle permanently in one area.

  1. Death of King Charles

    He then went in to the place he was going to be executed. He saw the piece of wood he was going to have to lie on. Also there were 4 pegs driven into the wood to fasten the king.

  2. Do you agree that Martin Luther King was the most important factor in helping ...

    He recruited the head of the Ku Klux Klan, Asa Carter who was one of the most racist men in Alabama, to be his main speech writer. In June 1962, he told voters in a campaign that he refused to integrate Alabama's school, even to the point of "standing in the schoolhouse door."

  1. Causes and consequences of the English Civil War

    the ?Eleven years of Tyranny? Him closing Parliament this many times showed that he did not want Parliament`s advice, he wanted Parliament`s money. This had its gradual effect as Charles was losing his money and things like food and clothes were priced higher.

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    The oration intends to inspire the younger generation, to have the determination she inherited, and to strive for equality, ?men will catch the disease? suggesting that women have equal abilities to inspire and make a difference. It cannot be ignored that the eulogy is present of relatives and friends, and therefore condolences would be amiable and sympathetic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work