• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Child evacuation during the second world war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Evacuation is when the government want to preserve the future of Britain by sending out the children, pregnant mothers, the disabled and teachers to the countryside. To get away from the cities, that are likely to bombarded by air. Which happened in late September 1939. The government also were well prepared for the war by issuing gas masks out to the evacuees, to be worn in case of gas attacks. Evacuation is portrayed in source A to be a failure. This source is taken from a textbook which is written for British schools. It says in the source ' that things did not go smoothly for the evacuees' and 'the local people were shocked with the deprivation and bad manners'. The source is likely to be reliable because it is written for a textbook that needs to be fair. ...read more.

Middle

As it was fifty years after the evacuation parts of the story might have been changed or forgotten, making it less reliable. Source D is a picture taken by the government during the war showing the evacuees having a bath. This likely to be not so reliable, which is probably used for propaganda. It shows partly that evacuation was a success. It shows the evacuees having a bath which they would probably never of had before. The children in the bath look cheerful and they all look clean. To some extent it shows over crowding and probably set up, because not many house would have that many baths or that many evacuees. Source E clearly states that evacuation was not a success. It tells us about the evacuees urinating on the walls and the parents not listing. It shows the massive cultural change for the evacuees and that host families did not realise that. ...read more.

Conclusion

It portrays the evacuees very badly again by saying that they are poor and cant afford slippers. It is another stereotypical view of the evacuees saying that they were all poor, bad mannered and had bad behaviour. I fell this is very negative about evacuation and outlines the problems faced by hosts and evacuees. This source shows the failure of evacuation. Near to the end of the year 1939 most of the evacuees returned home, because the cities were not being attacked. They called this the 'Phoney War'. The government produced many posters in 1939 and 1940 showing evacuation as a success, needed for the backing of the country throughout the war. Source B gives the evacuees the sense of safety, bringing confidence to the parents to evacuate their children. The experience for the evacuees will have been unforgettable, even though they might not of enjoyed it. From my knowledge and the majority of these sources I fell evacuation was a success because not many had died in air raids throughout the war. Ed Sloan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    Those who were evacuated and stayed in the safe areas almost always survived the bombings. The government successfully recognised the threat of an attack on civilians and had 'Operation Pied Piper" fully planned long before the threat became active. They were certainly successful in the first wave of evacuations: they

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    If children weren't evacuated then there would be more low morale across Britain. More children were likely to be killed if they stayed in the city and that would make people in Britain upset or angry about the war. This might then cause people not to be involved in the

  1. What was the extent of change in the role of the UK government in ...

    It proposed a scheme of benefit designed to guarantee health care and education for all. The reports main aim was achieve society where each man had the basic necessities to support him and his family. The Beveridge report shows the extent of change in that the government was taking a

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    it was unsuccessful, such as incidents of children awaiting evacuation being described as quiet, nervous and anxious. This shows that the children were scared of evacuation, as their minds had not been put to rest leaving them unaware of the likely outcome making the process look disorganized and unsuccessful.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Many country families were unaware of how city children lived. Evacuees were assumed to have lice and diseases. Some children had no experience of using a knife or fork to eat with. Also a lot of evacuees, like the characters in the source, found that the homes they stayed in were much cleaner than their own.

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45

    They are close together and hugging one another. The picture seems to imply that everyone, no matter what their age or background, was being equally affected by the war. The photograph in Source C also shows the positive attitude of the people. Many of them are giving the camera a thumbs up whilst others hold up a cup of tea.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work