• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Child evacuation during the second world war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Evacuation is when the government want to preserve the future of Britain by sending out the children, pregnant mothers, the disabled and teachers to the countryside. To get away from the cities, that are likely to bombarded by air. Which happened in late September 1939. The government also were well prepared for the war by issuing gas masks out to the evacuees, to be worn in case of gas attacks. Evacuation is portrayed in source A to be a failure. This source is taken from a textbook which is written for British schools. It says in the source ' that things did not go smoothly for the evacuees' and 'the local people were shocked with the deprivation and bad manners'. The source is likely to be reliable because it is written for a textbook that needs to be fair. ...read more.

Middle

As it was fifty years after the evacuation parts of the story might have been changed or forgotten, making it less reliable. Source D is a picture taken by the government during the war showing the evacuees having a bath. This likely to be not so reliable, which is probably used for propaganda. It shows partly that evacuation was a success. It shows the evacuees having a bath which they would probably never of had before. The children in the bath look cheerful and they all look clean. To some extent it shows over crowding and probably set up, because not many house would have that many baths or that many evacuees. Source E clearly states that evacuation was not a success. It tells us about the evacuees urinating on the walls and the parents not listing. It shows the massive cultural change for the evacuees and that host families did not realise that. ...read more.

Conclusion

It portrays the evacuees very badly again by saying that they are poor and cant afford slippers. It is another stereotypical view of the evacuees saying that they were all poor, bad mannered and had bad behaviour. I fell this is very negative about evacuation and outlines the problems faced by hosts and evacuees. This source shows the failure of evacuation. Near to the end of the year 1939 most of the evacuees returned home, because the cities were not being attacked. They called this the 'Phoney War'. The government produced many posters in 1939 and 1940 showing evacuation as a success, needed for the backing of the country throughout the war. Source B gives the evacuees the sense of safety, bringing confidence to the parents to evacuate their children. The experience for the evacuees will have been unforgettable, even though they might not of enjoyed it. From my knowledge and the majority of these sources I fell evacuation was a success because not many had died in air raids throughout the war. Ed Sloan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    She automatically assumed that the evacuees, Carrie and Nick, were too poor to have slippers, even though the real reason was that there was not enough room in the cases. This may be a fictional text, but it is supported by Source F, in which another evacuee remembers the annoyance

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    I think one of the government's public reasons was to put forward the image that they cared for children living in the cities. The government wanted to show the public that children would benefit from being evacuated because they would be looked after and would not have to go through the experience of war.

  1. What was the extent of change in the role of the UK government in ...

    newfound interest in the welfare of the people, and in doing so looking out for the country as a whole. Government mps argued that the workers deserved compensation for their troubles in the war and William Beveridge wanted this for the British people whilst Churchill turned his back.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    the scene were probably exaggerated making the source a less reliable attitude than the attitude in source E. From my own knowledge I know that the film was a semi-autobiographical account of the director's early childhood. This makes source F reliable because the director would have remembered details of his

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    it was unsuccessful, such as incidents of children awaiting evacuation being described as quiet, nervous and anxious. This shows that the children were scared of evacuation, as their minds had not been put to rest leaving them unaware of the likely outcome making the process look disorganized and unsuccessful.

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45

    killed as a result of the bombing could have been demoralising for the people. It could also have lead to the suggestion that Britain were incapable of winning the war. This would not encourage people to do their bit to help with the war effort.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work