• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Child evacuation during the second world war.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Evacuation is when the government want to preserve the future of Britain by sending out the children, pregnant mothers, the disabled and teachers to the countryside. To get away from the cities, that are likely to bombarded by air. Which happened in late September 1939. The government also were well prepared for the war by issuing gas masks out to the evacuees, to be worn in case of gas attacks. Evacuation is portrayed in source A to be a failure. This source is taken from a textbook which is written for British schools. It says in the source ' that things did not go smoothly for the evacuees' and 'the local people were shocked with the deprivation and bad manners'. The source is likely to be reliable because it is written for a textbook that needs to be fair. ...read more.


As it was fifty years after the evacuation parts of the story might have been changed or forgotten, making it less reliable. Source D is a picture taken by the government during the war showing the evacuees having a bath. This likely to be not so reliable, which is probably used for propaganda. It shows partly that evacuation was a success. It shows the evacuees having a bath which they would probably never of had before. The children in the bath look cheerful and they all look clean. To some extent it shows over crowding and probably set up, because not many house would have that many baths or that many evacuees. Source E clearly states that evacuation was not a success. It tells us about the evacuees urinating on the walls and the parents not listing. It shows the massive cultural change for the evacuees and that host families did not realise that. ...read more.


It portrays the evacuees very badly again by saying that they are poor and cant afford slippers. It is another stereotypical view of the evacuees saying that they were all poor, bad mannered and had bad behaviour. I fell this is very negative about evacuation and outlines the problems faced by hosts and evacuees. This source shows the failure of evacuation. Near to the end of the year 1939 most of the evacuees returned home, because the cities were not being attacked. They called this the 'Phoney War'. The government produced many posters in 1939 and 1940 showing evacuation as a success, needed for the backing of the country throughout the war. Source B gives the evacuees the sense of safety, bringing confidence to the parents to evacuate their children. The experience for the evacuees will have been unforgettable, even though they might not of enjoyed it. From my knowledge and the majority of these sources I fell evacuation was a success because not many had died in air raids throughout the war. Ed Sloan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    In looking at whether or not something is successful, it is not only necessary to look at those it directly concerns, but also at those who planned and organised it. In this case, to look at the government. So firstly, as I have said, evacuation was a success because it worked.

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    I think the government also decided to evacuate because if evacuation didn't take place, we might have lost the war or had many more casualties. Fewer women might have been able to work in factories if their children weren't evacuated.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    This once again shows that the government hasn't done enough to convince people that evacuation was for the better of the children of Britain and to calm the worries of parents.

  2. What was the extent of change in the role of the UK government in ...

    Initially the government had several aims: secure public safety, defend the country, maintain essential supplies and services and ultimately, win. In order to organise the masses, several new ministries within the coalition government were set up: home security, information, shipping, economic warfare and food.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    two children smiling, putting forward the attitude that the evacuees in Scotland were enjoying their evacuation. The advert is showing how grateful the evacuees are for their foster parents. The source's view of evacuation is that it is safer for the children and that the children enjoyed being evacuated.

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45

    all we are told is that there are bodies in sacks in a school playground, and any further details are based on what could have happened and not what we know happened, which could lead to inaccuracies. Source C does not tell us what the people were actually thinking or doing when their houses were bombed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work