• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

Extracts from this document...


Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. In terms of character, both Stalin and Lenin were politically skilled leaders. It was largely due to Lenin that the Bolsheviks were able to stay in power after 1917. He had good political judgement and was able to adapt to changing circumstances. During the Civil War in 1918, he introduced the War Communism policy, which kept the Red Army supplied with food and armament and he allowed Trotsky to rule the army as he wished. Without these changes the Communists perhaps would have lost the war. Stalin as well proved to be politically skilled, as he anticipated World War 2, and by introducing the 5 Year Plans, he managed to arm Russia well enough to defeat the Germans and to emerge as one of the winners of World War 2. He also managed to won the power struggle between him and Trotsky due to his manipulation of opponents. A more negative aspect of their character, was that both of them proved to be quite ruthless. Lenin used ruthless methods and terror to stay in power. He had as the secret police the Cheka, which carried out tortures and executions, arresting people that were considered to be dangerous. Stalin continued along the same way, he just merely altering the name- in 1922 the Cheka became the OGPU and in 1933 it was called the NKVD. ...read more.


Neither Stalin, nor Lenin had any religious beliefs, and both of them tried to reduce as much as possible the power of the Orthodox Church in Russia. Lenin closed down the churches in Russia, and Stalin opened them only during the World War 2, to boost the moral of the people, but afterwards, closed them once again. Both of the leaders' political beliefs were Communistic ones -with slight alterations- and both ruled Russia using a command economy -again with slight differences. Even though both Lenin's and Stalin's political- and economical- beliefs are adapted from Marx's ideas about Communism, there are some differences between Stalinism and Leninism. In the beginning of the twentieth century, Russia was just in the very early stages of Capitalism and was just moving out of Feudalism. However, Lenin decided to hasten this stage and 'jumped' into Socialism. He also believed that the Socialist Revolution should be a world-wide event and often spoke about spreading out Communism all over the world and each Communist country helping each other in this process. This was known as a 'Permanent Revolution'. However, Stalin had a very different view. He believed in 'Socialism in one country'- that the Russians could built up a Communist state without the aid of people from the outside. ...read more.


Another feature of Stalinism, which wasn't present in Leninism is the extensive use of propaganda to establish a personality cult around an absolute dictator , as well as a very active secret police to maintain social submission and silence political dissent. Although Lenin had his own secret police, the Cheka's activities were restricted after War Communism and the Red Terror was ended shortly afterwards. Also Stalin executed millions of people during the Great Purges, even his party members, a thing which Lenin never did. Therefore we can see that Stalin's and Lenin's character differed to a large extent. Lenin was mainly known as a charismatic, ideological and modest intellectual, while Stalin was an ambitious, manipulative and paranoid mediocre. The only thing which they had in common was their ruthlessness and very good political skills. In terms of beliefs they have a number of things in common: they believed in Communism, state planned economy, but not in any kind of religion. However, the way they put the first two into practice is a different matter. Lenin's command economy was a more flexile one and he believed that the workers should lead a revolution with the help of a strong Communist Party. Stalin on the other hand was more strict. He never altered too much on his tough policies- Industrialisation and Collectivisation- and he turned Russia into a totalitarian state with an extensive use of propaganda, 'Cult of Personality' and the secret police. ?? ?? ?? ?? Diana Lucaci ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Also, gigantic modern industrial complexes were built for many of the USSR's workers. Some industrial enterprises set up their own shops, bringing in food from farms, and the peasants supplied towns with milk, eggs, vegetables and meat from their private plots.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    This will make source F just as reliable as source E without any context because they are both seen as just two different opinions. Another reason of why source E is less reliable is because it was illegal to speak badly of Stalin in Russia in those times.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    country and wants equality between people regardless of their class or race; this is the seen as the basic ideology of communism. The words "He drowned of course" suggests that this is a routine occurrence and thus de-values humans and makes them sound replaceable and insignificant.

  2. Stalin and Lenin

    believed that he was the only one in Russia who would be able to save the Russian economy and help make Russia both an economic and a military powerhouse, Stalin seemed to be a very unintelligent man who didn't speak Russian well at all, he believed that Netherlands and Holland

  1. The return of Lenin

    * Naturally, they turned to the Bolsheviks, who were the anti-war party, to lead them. * However, the Bolsheviks were not ready to take power. * The demonstrations had turned to rioting, and eventually troops were sent in to break up the mobs.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    I think this Source is totally false because the only thing these words were transmiting is the desperate situation Khrushchev was to become Stalin�s succesor, so it is possible that Stalin blackmailed Khrushchev by telling him that if he told good things about him, Stalin could consider the possibility of

  1. Stalin’s Application of Communism

    McNeal further supports his comments by quoting one of Stalin's speeches, "You need have no doubt, comrades, that I am prepared for the future, too, to devote to the cause of the working class, to the cause of the proletarian revolution and world communism..."

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    the flesh showing blue through their torn clothing, demanding eagerly, 'Did you bring anything to read'?" (Ibid., p. 16, emphasis in original.) The Bolshevik Party gained because it stood for the only programme that showed a way out. Lenin's celebrated slogan was - "Patiently explain!"

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work