• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution The general pattern in the Industrial Revolution was that inventions were refined and refined continuously, till they were the most perfect machines around. Many of the key people at the time, simply took working machines and made the machines simpler to operate and to manage, or make the machine more efficient. The key people also got a financial backer then started producing their machine An example of this is the pairing of Boulton and Watt. What Watt had done was to take an invention of the inventor, Thomas Newcomen [steam engine], then simply added parts, and started to redesign the whole machine. All what Watt did was to make the motion of the original steam engine [up and down], turn rotary and clockwise/anti-clockwise. They then simply started showing their machine to factory owners around the country. The factory owners wanted the machine, because the machine was more efficient [used less fuel compared to the power it gave as it's product] than the Thomas Newcomen steam engine. ...read more.

Middle

This speeded up the process slightly. Richard Arkwright was another person who simply refined another inventor's idea. His machine was a refinement of the "spinning jenny." The main flaw with this machine was that it was extremely complicated to run, and that it made weaker thread, but the quality of the thread was high. Arkwright's machine tried to speed up the process of spinning yarn and making a strong thread. His machine was less complicated to run but needed to be run by horses. This machine made stronger thread but not at the quality as the "spinning jenny." His machine was called the "spinning frame" Then later on, Arkwright upgraded his machine to be run on water. This new machine was called the "water frame". This machine used the waterwheel to mimic horsepower. In 1769 to protect both machines, Arkwright got a patent. This meant that Arkwright could dictate the prices for his machines and still be in demand [nobody could make his machine without his consent]. ...read more.

Conclusion

Using coke meant that the design of the furnace machines needed to be changed. So Darby built a new furnace, which supported using coke. His machine only took off, thanks to the steam engine and the railway. His iron was perfect for what was needed in the design of the train. Trains needed a metal, which could take high temperatures in the engine. So in 1802, his great-great grandson created the first railway locomotive made of iron with a high-pressure boiler for Richard Trevithick [an English engineer and inventor]. His machine helped pave the way forward for the railway plus the whole of the Industrial Revolution. All three of these men helped push forward the Industrial Revolution. All their machines helped pull the Revolution together [e.g. Arkwright - positioning of mills, Boulton of Watt - freeing factories from next to rivers/canals, Darby - material needed for the locomotives which fuelled the Industrial Revolution]. But these simply did not think in the manner of the inventor. They were all businessmen. The true inventors were people like William Murdoch, Thomas Newcomen etc, who made the original concept of their machines, not refining someone else's machine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Furthermore , rubbish was often just tossed into the roads and animals were left to run free around these housing areas .Not only this but there was no proper sewage system and each street had only one lavatory to share between all the residents .

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    This source seems very unreliable as all of Stalin's actions when during his reign as dictator totally contradict that. Stalin was a man who believed that mans life did not matter, if this meant for Russia to progress economically and industrially.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    It set up thousands of new cr�ches and day care centres so that mothers could work. The source could also be used as a means of propaganda to get wives of normal men to be ashamed of their husbands as they are not participating in the protection of the country.

  2. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    in Britain using charcoal, a kind of burnt wood. However, a growing wood shortage made charcoal more difficult to obtain and during the 17th century, many iron masters had successfully experimented with the use of coal instead of charcoal for smelting.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Given what we know of Stalin it seems unlikely he really cared about one death. However whether the source tells us a true story or not is unimportant. The source is useful because it tells us about Stalin and the ways he tried to present himself to others.

  2. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    However, it must be noted that the women are all wives of the people who helped Stalin get through collectivization and who helped achiever Stalin's goals, and so Stalin is clearly going to be nice to them. The fact that the source is a photograph makes the source more reliable,

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    The sources give very different impressions of Stalin. Source A shows Stalin to be a monster responsible for the death of millions of people. Source B Shows Stalin to be a great man who helped Russian industry prosper. Source C shows Stalin to be a caring man who supports and is kind to all Russians In conclusion, the sources are different in the impression they give of Stalin.

  2. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    but were good for the time in fact the village still stands today - he also built a farm and the houses had gardens so the workers could grow there own produce which may have been sold or used as food, most likely for food.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work