• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution The general pattern in the Industrial Revolution was that inventions were refined and refined continuously, till they were the most perfect machines around. Many of the key people at the time, simply took working machines and made the machines simpler to operate and to manage, or make the machine more efficient. The key people also got a financial backer then started producing their machine An example of this is the pairing of Boulton and Watt. What Watt had done was to take an invention of the inventor, Thomas Newcomen [steam engine], then simply added parts, and started to redesign the whole machine. All what Watt did was to make the motion of the original steam engine [up and down], turn rotary and clockwise/anti-clockwise. They then simply started showing their machine to factory owners around the country. The factory owners wanted the machine, because the machine was more efficient [used less fuel compared to the power it gave as it's product] than the Thomas Newcomen steam engine. ...read more.

Middle

This speeded up the process slightly. Richard Arkwright was another person who simply refined another inventor's idea. His machine was a refinement of the "spinning jenny." The main flaw with this machine was that it was extremely complicated to run, and that it made weaker thread, but the quality of the thread was high. Arkwright's machine tried to speed up the process of spinning yarn and making a strong thread. His machine was less complicated to run but needed to be run by horses. This machine made stronger thread but not at the quality as the "spinning jenny." His machine was called the "spinning frame" Then later on, Arkwright upgraded his machine to be run on water. This new machine was called the "water frame". This machine used the waterwheel to mimic horsepower. In 1769 to protect both machines, Arkwright got a patent. This meant that Arkwright could dictate the prices for his machines and still be in demand [nobody could make his machine without his consent]. ...read more.

Conclusion

Using coke meant that the design of the furnace machines needed to be changed. So Darby built a new furnace, which supported using coke. His machine only took off, thanks to the steam engine and the railway. His iron was perfect for what was needed in the design of the train. Trains needed a metal, which could take high temperatures in the engine. So in 1802, his great-great grandson created the first railway locomotive made of iron with a high-pressure boiler for Richard Trevithick [an English engineer and inventor]. His machine helped pave the way forward for the railway plus the whole of the Industrial Revolution. All three of these men helped push forward the Industrial Revolution. All their machines helped pull the Revolution together [e.g. Arkwright - positioning of mills, Boulton of Watt - freeing factories from next to rivers/canals, Darby - material needed for the locomotives which fuelled the Industrial Revolution]. But these simply did not think in the manner of the inventor. They were all businessmen. The true inventors were people like William Murdoch, Thomas Newcomen etc, who made the original concept of their machines, not refining someone else's machine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    and rivers .It was this that had contaminated the water ways which was used by the rich and the poor all over the country. The result of the poor water supply shall be investigated further on in the essay .

  2. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    in Britain using charcoal, a kind of burnt wood. However, a growing wood shortage made charcoal more difficult to obtain and during the 17th century, many iron masters had successfully experimented with the use of coal instead of charcoal for smelting.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    At the time France had bred anti sentimental feelings to the Soviet Union as it was a communist nation. It wasn't invited to the Munich conference because of the Communist radical extremist beliefs the French saw in the USSR. Source B and C where both printed in the USSR at

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source B also shows Stalin proud of his achievement, but in this source Stalin's kindness and modesty is highlighted. He is shown taking much pride in how his plan worked out and is modest as he is sharing it with the peasants of Russia, to show that it's not only his achievement.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    The sources give very different impressions of Stalin. Source A shows Stalin to be a monster responsible for the death of millions of people. Source B Shows Stalin to be a great man who helped Russian industry prosper. Source C shows Stalin to be a caring man who supports and is kind to all Russians In conclusion, the sources are different in the impression they give of Stalin.

  2. Stalin : Man or monster

    2.Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? As source D was written by Stalin in 1945. This will mean that the source is likely to be biased as Stalin would have wanted to create a good public image for himself.The evidence suggests that Stalin was not how he portrays himself in the source.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    The first thing I noticed about this cartoon is the clothes the workers are wearing and the clothes Stalin is wearing. Stalin wearing white seems to stick out in the picture possibly showing his importance, almost liken an Angel. The fact that he is standing beside this new power station

  2. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    Therefore, the image of the workers being rewarded for their work totally contradicts the reality of what was happening. Source C is very similar to source B. it shows a photograph of Stalin congratulating wives of army officers. The women obviously look up to Stalin, thinking he is wonderful and are all trying to touch him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work