• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contribution to the Industrial Revolution The general pattern in the Industrial Revolution was that inventions were refined and refined continuously, till they were the most perfect machines around. Many of the key people at the time, simply took working machines and made the machines simpler to operate and to manage, or make the machine more efficient. The key people also got a financial backer then started producing their machine An example of this is the pairing of Boulton and Watt. What Watt had done was to take an invention of the inventor, Thomas Newcomen [steam engine], then simply added parts, and started to redesign the whole machine. All what Watt did was to make the motion of the original steam engine [up and down], turn rotary and clockwise/anti-clockwise. They then simply started showing their machine to factory owners around the country. The factory owners wanted the machine, because the machine was more efficient [used less fuel compared to the power it gave as it's product] than the Thomas Newcomen steam engine. ...read more.

Middle

This speeded up the process slightly. Richard Arkwright was another person who simply refined another inventor's idea. His machine was a refinement of the "spinning jenny." The main flaw with this machine was that it was extremely complicated to run, and that it made weaker thread, but the quality of the thread was high. Arkwright's machine tried to speed up the process of spinning yarn and making a strong thread. His machine was less complicated to run but needed to be run by horses. This machine made stronger thread but not at the quality as the "spinning jenny." His machine was called the "spinning frame" Then later on, Arkwright upgraded his machine to be run on water. This new machine was called the "water frame". This machine used the waterwheel to mimic horsepower. In 1769 to protect both machines, Arkwright got a patent. This meant that Arkwright could dictate the prices for his machines and still be in demand [nobody could make his machine without his consent]. ...read more.

Conclusion

Using coke meant that the design of the furnace machines needed to be changed. So Darby built a new furnace, which supported using coke. His machine only took off, thanks to the steam engine and the railway. His iron was perfect for what was needed in the design of the train. Trains needed a metal, which could take high temperatures in the engine. So in 1802, his great-great grandson created the first railway locomotive made of iron with a high-pressure boiler for Richard Trevithick [an English engineer and inventor]. His machine helped pave the way forward for the railway plus the whole of the Industrial Revolution. All three of these men helped push forward the Industrial Revolution. All their machines helped pull the Revolution together [e.g. Arkwright - positioning of mills, Boulton of Watt - freeing factories from next to rivers/canals, Darby - material needed for the locomotives which fuelled the Industrial Revolution]. But these simply did not think in the manner of the inventor. They were all businessmen. The true inventors were people like William Murdoch, Thomas Newcomen etc, who made the original concept of their machines, not refining someone else's machine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Another example of where the source is exaggerating about how great Stalin is, is where it says that their children's first words will be Stalin. "And when the woman I live presents me with a child the first word it shall utter will be: Stalin."

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Thus it can be concluded that all three sources show conflicting stories and thus all three can be seen to be untrustworthy and biased. 2) Study source D. Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? Explain your answer.

  1. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    in Britain using charcoal, a kind of burnt wood. However, a growing wood shortage made charcoal more difficult to obtain and during the 17th century, many iron masters had successfully experimented with the use of coal instead of charcoal for smelting.

  2. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Despite this , borrowers had come from a myriad of different backgrounds which meant that several people were more than willing to take risks . There were different types of capital borrowing from bank lenders . These were long and short term capital .

  1. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    Apart from the village Greg also built an apprentice house, this meant he could basically take in children and not have to pay them until they were such an age where they could choose to stay or leave the mill - they received a small amount of money when they

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    He saw it as a failed project, not the tremendous cost in human life it actually was. Source C makes Stalin appear to care for the wives of those at war, so I assume that it is an "official" photograph.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    We cannot be sure that the source is reliable in its depiction of past events. It certainly is true that Stalin was exiled to Siberia earlier in his life. However we cannot be sure if the particular story he tells is true.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    In fact this view is also supported in source D an extract from Stalin where we can see that he is paranoid. I think that many historians and other sources support this view, which makes source F quite reliable, as well it written by somebody that would have known Stalin quite well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work