• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could Britain and France have prevented the outbreak of war in Europe after Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933?

Extracts from this document...


Could Britain and France have prevented the outbreak of war in Europe after Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933? In order to the answer the question, it is important to identify what France and Britain could have done to prevent war; the first means to stop Hitler would be through appeasement. This means that Britain and France would have to give Hitler concessions n order to prevent war, this was feasible because both believed that The treaty of Versailles was slightly harsh and unfair and were thus ready to give in some concessions to maintain peace. Both countries were also afraid of the horror of war and wished to prevent. Another way to prevent war would be through deterrence using the alliance system, if Hitler felt threatened by a multi-filtered problem cause by alliances; strong militaries and effective rearmament that exceed Germany capacity war may have been prevented. Another way to prevent war was through conformation with the League of Nations; however the main flaw with this system was that the league could only do as much as the countries wanted them to do. ...read more.


In reality, the alliance or pact with Poland caused or more accurately trigged the outbreak of war. The order of post world war one had collapsed and there was almost a shift back into old ideas whereby Hitler had disregarded the power of the League of Nations. Hitler didn't believe that France and Britain would take any steps to stop him because they hadn't in the past, the "lost opportunities" and therefore was prepared to risk war over Poland because of Russian support. It can be said that it was too let for appeasement and Britain and France could not given in anymore then they already had. Historians such as RJ Ovary argued that the Chamberlain's policy had been accurate, they had forced Germany into a war earlier then Hitler has wanted and a time where Britain rearmament was at its peak. He believed that in the long run Uk's ability to sustain resistance led to Hitler confrontation by the Us before he was ready for a total war Ovary argues that Hitler's economic and military planning projected an awesome military power by the mid 40s if they were allowed to develop. ...read more.


In this case it can be said that Britain and France could have prevented through either appeasement, the recreation of the alliance of Russian - Britain and France as in 1914, the enforcement of the treaty of Versailles or through confrontation by the League of Nations. In conclusion, it is hard to determine whether Britain and France could have prevented war because this question depends on Hitler's intentions for war and to what extent Britain and France were ready to go to prevent the war, They had managed to prevent war earlier but where unable to use the same strategies in 1930 to prevent the war and this could be because Hitler in 1939, was prepared for war and was willing to risk it because of the Nazi-Soviet pact which saved him the fear of having a war on two fronts. The failure to recreate the entente of 1914, which would have threaten Hitler, the lack of will and capacity on France and Britain part and most importantly the view that Hitler was intent on war led to the failure in preventing war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why did Europe go to war in 1939

    The Russian Pact or Nazi-Soviet pact came to an agreement that the Nazis would invade Poland from the west and the Soviets from the east and when Poland has been taken over it will be split between Russia and Germany.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    So Franco's victory was essentially another triumph for Hitler and this proved to be another example, which highlighted the true weakness of appeasement. However, Britain was again about to try and appease Hitler. Versailles stated that a German union with Austria was forbidden, and until 1938 none of Hitler's actions had actually overridden the territorial frontiers established in 1919.

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    the continual demands of Hitler were flared by the lack of opposition, and his continual greed for expansion, his demands were rarely attacked, simply given into with little hesitancy. If an overly bellicose war-enthusiasm had produced the mass slaughter of World War I, then the resulting determination to avoid war at all costs in the 1930s proved equally counterproductive.

  2. adolf hitler

    Even those in work suffered as many were only working part-time. With the drop in demand for labour, wages also fell and those with full-time work had to survive on lower incomes. Hitler, who was considered a fool in 1928 when he predicted economic disaster, was now seen in a different light.

  1. Why Did Britain And France Pursue A Policy Of Appeasement Between 1933 And 1939 ...

    This was later cancelled as Hitler had been making claims saying that Schuschnigg (the new Austrian Chancellor) was mistreating the Austrian Nazis, thus forcing Schyschnigg to resign. German troops entered Vienna on 12th March 1938, and received an ecstatic welcome.

  2. The Fall of France in World War II.

    France's belief of the unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles, or the idea of revanchism, factored another reason for her failure to respond. Other than negotiating a pact to appease Hitler, French policy-makers and their British counterparts agreed that there was no real other alternative (McMillan 120).

  1. There are many reasons why Hitler came to power in 1933.

    The trial was front-page news for 24 days and this meant that the whole of Germany had now heard of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Public support grew even when the party was banned. In 1929 the stock market crashed and there was world depression.

  2. What is the tradition of animosity between racial groups in Europe during the Twentieth ...

    after picking up all aspects of different cultures and ways of life from their travels. By 1438, they had reached Hungary, and had entered Serbia and other Balkan countries. The Gypsies then spread into Poland and Russia, and by the sixteenth century had reached Sweden and England.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work