• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could the Paris Peace Conference treaties be justified at the time?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Could the treaties be justified at the time? During the Paris Peace Conference, there was a lot of tension and pressure building up between the leaders of 32 nations, and most important The Big 3. The Treaty of Versailles, which was sign by the 32 nations including Germany I believe, can be justified for many reasons. First the ideas of the three main leaders, Woodrow Wilson, Georges Clemenceau and David Lloyd George were so different that there was no way that the three leaders were going to come to a decision that they would all agree to. This meant that they would have to compromise and fast, sine they had already spent too much time on making the treaty. ...read more.

Middle

There is no way Germany was going to sign the treat if they weren't in such a difficult position and even when they did sign it they believed that the treaty could not be justified. Jet this is looking only a Germany's point of view, and if one looked towards the others, they would see that the treaty could be justified at the time since there was great pressure and many different ideas. The fact that every leader came with their face high and proud and left feeling that they had achieved the least comes to tell us that they wanted even more and by the fact that every leader came to the treaty and expected everyone else to follow his rules simply means that there was no way that they would all come to a perfect treaty and more just that this. ...read more.

Conclusion

They wanted to get what was best for their country, not caring about the others. Every leader was looking for the treaty to be justifiable and not looking from another leader's point of view. The treaty was altogether pretty mixed up and rational. Because many different ideas from different people who thought differently were put together, it made parts of the treaty not agree with each other and made the harsh treaty as expected. There was no way that in the available time the leaders were to come up with a treaty which would please all leaders and the characters, and I therefore believe that they came up with the best treaty they could taking into account all of the above factors. By the above points and many other, I believe that the treaties at the time could be justified, not meaning that I agree with the terms made in the treaty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    In addition, the hatred of Britain and France for taking Germans away from their nation in places like Danzig and Alsace-Lorraine created even more instability. The main German complaints were that the Germans had been tricked into signing an armistice by believing that the peace treaty would be based on

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    He only told the country of the victories that Germany had but not of the losses. When Ebert had to sign the armistice it came as a complete shock to them as they thought that they were winning and did not know why they were signing an armistice.

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    As well as the USA must give even more money to prosper Europe, since USA's losses are much less than those of Europe. Controversies, however, are very foolish, since there is no reason from sacrifices equilibrium. 1. The amount of money England borrowed from the States were approximately the same

  2. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    Lloyd George suggested the sanctity of treaties, a limit to armaments, and a just system of international relations. This was all aimed at reducing the risk of any future wars. "[The aim of the Treaty is] to compel Germany, in so far as it is in her power, to restore, to repair and to redress.

  1. were the paris peace settlements fair

    The kingdom of Hijaz which became an independent country Syria which was lost to France and Palestine Mesopotamia (Iraq) to Britain Armenia which became independent. Germany and her allies had damaged France and Belgium enabling it to be adequate for Germany and her allies to pay some sort of reparations for the damage that had been caused.

  2. What was the impact of the other 4 Paris Peace Treaties?

    The Hungarians continued to resent a settlement that left up to 3 million Magyars (Hungarians) under foreign rule. Treaty of S�vres The Treaty of S�vres signed on 10 August 1920 was the peace treaty between the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) and the Allies at the end of WW1.

  1. Were the Peace Settlements after World War One Justified?

    The majority of people in Alsace-Lorraine and the Polish Corridor were French or Polish speakers, and thus their preferences were to return to their native countries. However, handing the Corridor to Poland meant that East Prussia was cut off from the rest of Germany, and thus German-speakers were separated.

  2. In What Ways Were the Aims of the Big Three Different in the Paris ...

    Clemenceau knew he had the French people behind him as they wanted to feel safe again; they were hugely angered and wanted to see Germany crippled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work