• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Decommissioning has still not been achieved, despite the Good Friday agreement of 1998. Loyalist and Nationalist communities still show open hostilities towards each other. With reference to the following events can you explain why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Decommissioning has still not been achieved, despite the Good Friday agreement of 1998. Loyalist and Nationalist communities still show open hostilities towards each other. With reference to the following events can you explain why? Objective 1 1. The Easter rising of 1916 and its aftermath to 1922 2. Civil rights marches and Bloody Sunday 3. The Enniskillen Bomb 4. The Omagh bomb Nationalist and Unionist views vary extremely, even within their own parties. Extremists on either side simply refuse to agree with each other. For example the DUP will simply not sit and negotiate with Sinn Fein, and the IRA will not negotiate with any unionist party. However the majority will sit together and talk, despite the extremist views. Neither side has complete control over extremists. In recent months disarming is a big issue; Sinn Fein is on the brink of being removed from the executive assembly because they have failed to persuade the IRA to disarm. The unionist parties firmly believe that Sinn Fein and the IRA are one and the same. So when an IRA weapons dump was discovered in a raid, revealing up to date weapons, Sinn Fein was publicly attacked, despite having nothing to do with the dump. ...read more.

Middle

Unionists, generally, however, see the whole thing differently; they see the 1916 rebellion as a betrayal of nationalists to Britain. Often they say that 'Ulstermen were dying in the Somme for Britain, but Nationalists rebelled. They continually use it as an example of nationalist untrustworthiness. To them the black and tans were just and saved Ireland. It proved that they had no place in a catholic Ireland. They feel that the partition of Ireland was their only option. The civil right s marches of 1972 and bloody Sunday hold their different views. Nationalists see the marches as the start or reform, after years of suppression and oppression by the government and slow reforms. Nationalists on the whole, see Bloody Sunday as a tragic event, and a betrayal of the British Government. Extremists see it as pre meditated murder of innocents. Both factions draw parallels to the black and tans and the Army. Extreme nationalists see Bloody Sunday as a reason to fight unionism. Nationalists all over Ireland saw the army as a second wave of the black and tans. The Unionists however see the civil rights marchers as a front for nationalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Nationalists likewise will not stop until they have Northern Ireland back, by peace or by force. There is no way for the two communities to exist together. Each generation becomes more and more entrenched in their beliefs. When one side attacks, the other retaliates with twice the force, giving way for another attack. Thus a circle of violence occurs, until one side does something so terrible that there is a call for peace. However when the peace comes it is uneasy with extremists ready for war again. The Enniskillen Bomb in1987 was one such event. It shocked all, extremists and non-extremists, on all sides. The IRA lost its 'grass root' support. And surprisingly it was a stimulus to peace because victim Gordon Wilson began a campaign for peace. The war was so terrible that it had caused peace. Firm unionists still feel anger over Enniskillen, but most nationalists feel that they must abandon armed struggle, but whenever a terrorist group gives up its arms, another group breaks away and continues to fight. Continual cycles of violence cause hate between the communities, Even if the IRA is disarmed, it will arm again, and recent news has proved this. The splintered view the world has of the events drives the communities apart. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Northern Ireland - The Good Friday Agreement was created in April 1998, and then ...

    However, negotiations between Sinn F�in and the British government slowed these talks down. Plus at the same time there were paramilitary campaigns of bombings and shootings, for example the Warrington bomb in England, which killed two boys. This was obviously very bad for the peace process as it caused a lot of anger and tension.

  2. The Real IRA

    Susie Derkins, author of The Irish Republican Party, claims, "It was leading to their exclusion from any official discussions of Northern Ireland's future" (43-44). A cease-fire was called on August 31, 1994. This allowed the IRA to join the legislative talks that lead to the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 (44).

  1. What made the Good Friday Agreement possible in 1998?

    Also at this point, the British were under a lot of pressure to come up with a peaceful agreement. They decided on the Downing Street Declaration in 1993. This was a declaration in which only parties which rejected violence could join and it stated that the future of Northern Ireland must be decided by its citizens.

  2. Describe and explain Unionist reactions to the Good Friday Agreement of 1998

    In July the IRA once more declared a ceasefire and Sinn Fein were allowed to join in with the peace talks. Ian paisley said they were at the peace talks through blackmail - the IRA were implying that 'if you don't let us join we will shoot more people, and bomb more places'.

  1. What Events Made The Signing Of The Good Friday Agreement Possible?

    their strength in the Assembly; a set of 'North-South Bodies' to bring about cooperation in government policy and programmes on a number of issues; a British-Irish Council, composed of representatives from the governments of the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, the United Kingdom, Scotland, Wales, the Channel Islands, and the

  2. The Good Friday Agreement has been a failure and the problems are still Impossible ...

    Another aspect of the agreement that was fully implemented was the setting up of the Northern Ireland Assembly. This was an aspect of the agreement that was a key factor into the success of the agreement. It contained the fact that an assembly of people were constructed, an executive was formed and the transfer of powers took place.

  1. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source C, along with source B, can seem to prove that A, the army statement, is wrong. Source B seems to imply that the marchers were too busy running to be concerned with returning fire, whilst Source C, somewhat boldly, says "I saw no one shooting at troops."

  2. Explain why the marching season in Northern Ireland still causes tension between the two ...

    Many of these people died of hunger and disease. This was the start of Catholic hatred towards the English rule and towards Protestants. The next big event to happen was the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. The marching season commemorates the Protestant victory over Catholics at the Battle of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work