Describe and explain Unionist reactions to the Good Friday Agreement of 1998

Authors Avatar

e) Describe and explain Unionist reactions to the Good Friday Agreement of 1998

        During the 1880’s, the Catholic Church tried to make Sinn Fein look for a peaceful settlement. In the late 1980’s, the SDLP and Sinn Fein tried to find a way forward by starting talks. At this time, the British government decided that peace could only be accomplished by getting all political parties and interests involved. The Northern Ireland Secretary, Peter Brooke, tried to involve the IRA and its political voice, Sinn Fein, in the talks. Peter Brooke also said that Northern Ireland had no economic or strategic value to Britain. If at any time the majority of people in the north wanted to be part of a united Ireland, Britain would not stand in their way. At the same time, the President of the USA, Bill Clinton, was also very supportive of a way forward to a peaceful solution. During all these events the violence in Northern Ireland continued.

        Talks between the Southern Irish and the British governments led to the Downing Street Declaration in 1993, where both sides showed a motivation to look for a peaceful solution to the problems. In April 1994, the IRA declared a ceasefire in response. However, the talks on how Northern Ireland should be run did not move forward quickly (this was partly because the IRA refused to be disarmed). The frustration grew and the ceasefire was called to and end in February 1996. Sinn Fein was then expelled from the peace talks. It was not until Tony Blair and Labour came to power that hopes for peace re-surfaced. Tony Blair appointed the unconventional Mo Mowlam as Secretary for Northern Ireland. Mowlam’s evident good will and directness gave a new drive to the peace process. In July the IRA once more declared a ceasefire and Sinn Fein were allowed to join in with the peace talks. Ian paisley said they were at the peace talks through blackmail – the IRA were implying that ‘if you don’t let us join we will shoot more people, and bomb more places’. The Unionists then demanded that the IRA threw away all their guns if they were really committed to getting peace. The Unionists were showing fear that more people were going to be killed by the IRA if they still had their weapons. The IRA refused to give up their weapons as they thought they would be without power – if they were excluded from the talks again they couldn’t do anything about it. Sinn Fein then asked for all the British army to get out of Northern Ireland. They also requested that all the IRA prisoners were released. The Unionists started to accuse the IRA of killing people and dumping their bodies in ditches – the Unionists believed that they should not even have talks with Sinn Fein when that is what they have done. However, the Unionists were ignoring the fact that they had also killed people. Three months into the talks and not even an agenda had been agreed upon.

Join now!

        In the main prison of Ireland (named Maze) a leading Loyalist terrorist was shot dead by a Republican terrorist in 1997. This shooting was basically the influence of the IRA, and shows that even in high security prisons, people were not safe. This incident scared the Unionists, if they knew guns couldn’t be found in prisons, how could they be sure they were safe? In the prison even the walls were marked with the letters UDA (Ulster defence association) by the terrorists.

        After this incident, the Loyalists didn’t want to support the peace talks, which meant they would start shooting ...

This is a preview of the whole essay