• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe how events in Russia1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe how events in Russia 1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II On 2nd March 1917 Tsar Nicholas II signed an act of abdication, and the 300 year old period of the Romanovs effectively came to an end. Less than two weeks earlier, the prospect of such an outcome had seemed unlikely. However political pressure had been built up even before then with events causing a strain before 1914. The start of the war had saw support for the Tsar which was sorely needed. But as military defeats built up and economic suffering grew, the survival of the regime saw little chance of survival. Events in the past contributed to the downfall. These things were not easily forgotten by the Russian people. The Russo-Japanese war was a result of increasingly expansion in Russian foreign policy in the East; intended as a way to increase the respect of the autocracy at home and abroad. But resulted in a humiliating defeat for Russia. This war marked the first time any Asian power had defeated a European power in a real war. ...read more.

Middle

Within three months, many of those trained before 1914 were dead. Russian casualty lists were building for what the Russians had in great abundance was men. Therefore more and more peasants were required to serve in the armies. News of the fate of the soldiers was slow in reaching their relatives. Gradually news, often in the form of a returned soldier disabled by his wounds, slipped through. The effect on the peasants of mismanagement and defeat at the front was not advantageous to their war effort. The workers were experiencing longer hours of work in conditions which had changed little in the past twenty years. Not even after "Bloody Sunday" did change occur. Conditions for workers, which had been bad in 1914, were being made worse by the war. They were experiencing inflation and food shortages. It is true that less was being grown by the peasants but the real shortages of food were because of poor distribution. Russia had enough food but it was not reaching the cities. Many peasants were literate so were able to read the newspapers and political pamphlets produced. Strikes for better conditions and pay increased in 1916. ...read more.

Conclusion

All that was necessary to gain high office in Russia during this period was to gain the ear of Rasputin and, it was said, bribe him. From September 1915 to February 1917 Tsarist ministers were men of high aspirations but little ability. Such crushing incompetence was impossible to overlook and hardened the attitude of those who, now in increasing numbers, believed in the need of a change in government. The Tsar returned from the battlefront briefly at the beginning of 1917 and there was another round of dismissal of ministers but no new rulers were appointed. I believe that the downfall of the Tsar was down to many different reasons and events. The war and the casualties made everyone in Russia distraught and disheartened. The "German woman" (the Tsarina Alexandra) and Rasputin caused many conspiracies, people believed it was that the Germans were bringing down Russia. They were "German spies" in the eyes of Russian people. The lack of food supplies reached crisis point in 1917. Failure of the railway system to meet the demands of war. These are all massive reasons why the downfall of the Russian Tsar was made undeniable. -John Garvey ?? ?? ?? ?? John Garvey Page 1 01/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    However Nicholas made sure that the Duma had no real power and that he would have the final say in every decision they were to make. In March 1906 the first Duma was elected. The voting system was not in favour of peasants, even so the majority of the Duma

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Source B then goes on to say how the soldiers had mutinied, who were mostly peasants in uniform. With no method of control in Petrograd the Tsar was unable to stop the demonstrations. Revolution was now inevitable. Source D helps support the evidence given in Source B, by giving us the truth before the soldiers mutinied.

  1. What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar?

    This policy was particularly disliked in areas such as Poland, Finland and Latvia. Interestingly, of the Russian Empire, only half of the population was actually originally Russian, or of Moscovy descent. This was a potential time bomb, as seen in the 19th century in Europe during the rise if nationalism.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Under these circumstances, the policy of the regime was decisive. It was the blind alley of bureaucratic rule that brought the fireworks display of economic advance to a shuddering halt. Unlike the development of capitalism which relies on the market for the allocation of resources, a nationalised economy requires conscious planning and direction.

  1. The Romanovs had ruled Russia since 1613

    Evidence of Russia's military weakness increased the people's discontent and demands for reform. On 9th January of 1905, in St. Petersburg, a procession of peasants and workers came to respectfully present a petition to the tsar outlining the problems that they hoped they could resolve.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    from others because he made all of the final ideas and nobody could change his mind. This also was a long term cause of why the Tsar was bad and so it would have also affected any previous tsars as well.

  1. To what extent is the title “Tsar Liberator” a true description of Alex II?

    It was believed that serfdom prevented the growth of Russian industry, interfering with the free flow of labour and restricting enterprise. It also prevented bringing in modern methods or agriculture, which left Russia un-wealthy and not developing like the rest of Europe.

  2. I will describe the lives of three types of people: The Royal Family, The ...

    By 1900, six years into Nicholas' reign, 82% of Russian citizens were peasants all over the Russian empire. Up until 1861 the peasants had been serfs that means slaves of their landlords with no rights, no freedom and no land of their own.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work