• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe how events in Russia1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe how events in Russia 1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II On 2nd March 1917 Tsar Nicholas II signed an act of abdication, and the 300 year old period of the Romanovs effectively came to an end. Less than two weeks earlier, the prospect of such an outcome had seemed unlikely. However political pressure had been built up even before then with events causing a strain before 1914. The start of the war had saw support for the Tsar which was sorely needed. But as military defeats built up and economic suffering grew, the survival of the regime saw little chance of survival. Events in the past contributed to the downfall. These things were not easily forgotten by the Russian people. The Russo-Japanese war was a result of increasingly expansion in Russian foreign policy in the East; intended as a way to increase the respect of the autocracy at home and abroad. But resulted in a humiliating defeat for Russia. This war marked the first time any Asian power had defeated a European power in a real war. ...read more.

Middle

Within three months, many of those trained before 1914 were dead. Russian casualty lists were building for what the Russians had in great abundance was men. Therefore more and more peasants were required to serve in the armies. News of the fate of the soldiers was slow in reaching their relatives. Gradually news, often in the form of a returned soldier disabled by his wounds, slipped through. The effect on the peasants of mismanagement and defeat at the front was not advantageous to their war effort. The workers were experiencing longer hours of work in conditions which had changed little in the past twenty years. Not even after "Bloody Sunday" did change occur. Conditions for workers, which had been bad in 1914, were being made worse by the war. They were experiencing inflation and food shortages. It is true that less was being grown by the peasants but the real shortages of food were because of poor distribution. Russia had enough food but it was not reaching the cities. Many peasants were literate so were able to read the newspapers and political pamphlets produced. Strikes for better conditions and pay increased in 1916. ...read more.

Conclusion

All that was necessary to gain high office in Russia during this period was to gain the ear of Rasputin and, it was said, bribe him. From September 1915 to February 1917 Tsarist ministers were men of high aspirations but little ability. Such crushing incompetence was impossible to overlook and hardened the attitude of those who, now in increasing numbers, believed in the need of a change in government. The Tsar returned from the battlefront briefly at the beginning of 1917 and there was another round of dismissal of ministers but no new rulers were appointed. I believe that the downfall of the Tsar was down to many different reasons and events. The war and the casualties made everyone in Russia distraught and disheartened. The "German woman" (the Tsarina Alexandra) and Rasputin caused many conspiracies, people believed it was that the Germans were bringing down Russia. They were "German spies" in the eyes of Russian people. The lack of food supplies reached crisis point in 1917. Failure of the railway system to meet the demands of war. These are all massive reasons why the downfall of the Russian Tsar was made undeniable. -John Garvey ?? ?? ?? ?? John Garvey Page 1 01/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    However Nicholas made sure that the Duma had no real power and that he would have the final say in every decision they were to make. In March 1906 the first Duma was elected. The voting system was not in favour of peasants, even so the majority of the Duma

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Nicholas II had huge pressures upon him to succeed; he was in power from 1894- 1917. The peasants were important to Nicholas' success but he couldn't keep them happy so in return they gave him grief. For most of Nicholas' rule Russia was unstable.

  1. What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar?

    This policy was particularly disliked in areas such as Poland, Finland and Latvia. Interestingly, of the Russian Empire, only half of the population was actually originally Russian, or of Moscovy descent. This was a potential time bomb, as seen in the 19th century in Europe during the rise if nationalism.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    It also made the country difficult to govern because after people found about the massacre, disorder and looting occurred. This is a short term cause that made the Russian empire very difficult to run, but it would not have affected any previous Tsars.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    This cannot be undertaken successfully by a handful of bureaucrats in Moscow, even if they were Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky. Such a state of affairs requires the involvement of the mass of the population in the running of industry and the state.

  2. The Romanovs had ruled Russia since 1613

    The workers gained poor wages and had no trade unions to fight for them, as this was illegal. Revolutionary activist from parties such as the Social Democrats and Socialists Revolutionaries had a wiling audience. Workers increasingly went on strike to demand improved working and living conditions.

  1. Russia 1914 To 1917: Coursework : Sources Question

    The country had now changed its opinions to a pessimistic view. Their patriotism and faith in leadership also began to fade as promises of victory and triumph were not true. Study Sources D, E, F and G. Use these sources to explain why Tsar Nicholas II became more unpopular in Russia during the war.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    became a centre of liberal discontent against the shortcomings of the Russian war effort. Therefore, this feeling of resentment against the government, like the food shortages, the rationing and the inflation, also prompted the people of Russia to take part in the strikes and demonstrations in Petrograd.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work