• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe How The Nazis Used The Reighstag Fire To Increase Their Power In Germany In The Years 1933-34

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe How The Nazis Used The Reighstag Fire To Increase Their Power In Germany In The Years 1933-34 During the Years 1933-34 the Nazis used the Reichstag fire to gain power in Germany. I Believe however if Papen Hindenburg had never appointed Hitler as chancellor in 1933 The Nazis would not have been able to use the fire to rise to power. Therefore I will first review the situation in parliament before Hitler was given power. I will discover why the government gave Hitler the title of Chancellor, what happened once Hitler was made chancellor and what was the significance of Hitler being taken in to government. By 1932 it was almost impossible for the democratic system to work in Germany. This was because the Communists and the Nazi's controlled the majority of seats in parliament. They could both vote together against the government, this way, anything the government tried to pass, such as trading, laws, and general business could be stopped. This was extremely annoying for the government, as they needed to deal with the problems of the depression. It almost seemed as though the Communists and the Nazis were working together to control parliament, but each party had their reasons. The Communists wanted to see a total breakdown of the system, so that a revolution could take place and a new Communist government could take control. ...read more.

Middle

All that is known is that the Communists were blamed for all of it. Hitler knew that the fire would work to his advantage. After word had got out that all Communists had been captured, Communism practically ceased to exist in Germany. The public now feared the Communists and entrusted themselves in Hitler. They thought that the country was under attack by dangerous extremists. In such an emergency situation they would be more likely to support the government, and at the time, the Nazis were the government. Hitler now had the nation exactly where he wanted it. Thanks to the fire, the Nazis won the 1933 election with 17 million votes and 288 seats. As soon as Hitler became Chancellor, he appointed Herman Goering, another Nazi, as Minister of the Interior. Goering was now in charge of the police and the prisons. This way Hitler could use the police to round up his opponents once the fire had given him an excuse. So the end result was that by being chancellor he could take full advantage of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazis were able to win the election. This was a short-term cause for Hitler's rise to power. Obviously it was a stepping stone into his overall rise, but Papen and Hindenberg clearly underestimated Hitler. ...read more.

Conclusion

He had worn them down but in another way had pulled them up so that he could achieve the power that he wanted. Some people say that Hitler was very clever in the way that he handled the Situation, others say he was very lucky. The answer is that he was clever and lucky. He was lucky because of the occurrence of the great depression and the Reichstag Fire. Surely without these two elements he wouldn't have got anywhere near to achieving the role of chancellor, that is why they were so important. Still, it was simply a case of good timing. However, we also cannot dispute the fact, that he handled these situations excellently. When the depression came Along, he told the German people he would get them out of it and he did. It is possible to say that if he hadn't plagued and brainwashed the German people with his racist and destructive views, he would be one of the most memorable politicians in Germany's history. Then he had to deal with the Reichstag Fire. The answer he found was obvious. Blame the Communists, Hitler's opponents to the forthcoming election. That was all that was needed to win the election. As soon as Hitler told the German people that the Communists had started the fire, they fell for it and supported Hitler in his rise to power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

Response to question - To what extent has the student answered the set question? How explicit is their response?
The student clearly has an understanding of the question set, but fails to structure it to their advantage and at times, ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Response to question - To what extent has the student answered the set question? How explicit is their response?
The student clearly has an understanding of the question set, but fails to structure it to their advantage and at times, there are a few confusing statements or assertions made. The Reichstag Fire should have dominated the essay, but instead, other factors stood out in the essay which slightly undermined the wording of the question. The introduction and conclusion does not serve the purpose for an essay and it does not add to the student’s argument. The points that the student makes (whilst not always necessarily relevant) are supported by strong evidence giving the essay a strong line of argument and there are only a few occasions where the evidence has been weak, however, there are narrative sections in the piece as well. Personally, I would not have gone into so much detail about what happened before Hitler became chancellor as I don’t think it is that relevant to the question set.

Level of analysis

Level of analysis - To what extent does the writer show appropriate analytical skills for this level of qualification? Have they made evaluative judgements using suitable evidence? Have these examples been developed throughout the response and has an appropriate conclusion been reached?
For GCSE, historiography is not necessary but there is a need to understand the different viewpoints of people living in the period in comparison to others with hindsight. The student tends to assert their view (with hindsight) to reason why (for example) Hitler acted as he did. This undermines the other factors that could have influenced his decision making. The understanding of Nazi Germany is not doubted, but the student references their understanding only by modern terms and lacks adding in the opinions of the Germans living in Nazi Germany.
On most occasions, the student has stated their point of opinion and supported it with relevant detail. However, they fail to acknowledge the other side of the story or omit the other factors involved in the topic. Most textbooks (and indeed web sources) state that Hitler was a great leader and was adept at manipulating propaganda and it appears that the student has taken the textbooks very literally and has asserted this in the essay without sufficient evidence to back it up. This, unfortunately, does no favours to the marks.
The appropriate conclusion was reached, but the conclusion contained too many assertions for it to be convincing. The examples used, whilst strong at times, were under developed – a common pitfall for most GCSE students, such as the importance of the Enabling Act. The simplest way to tackle this problem is remembering Point, Evidence, Explain (PEE). The explanation is what is most lacking in this essay to score it top marks. The point and evidence are virtually useless without explaining them in relation to the question and your argument.

Quality of writing

Quality of writing - Is the writing accurate in terms of spelling, grammar and punctuation? Has the writer used technical terms expected at this level of qualification? To what extent does the writer follow conventions and expectations for written work at this level?
The spelling, grammar and punctuation are mostly fine with one or two places which are questionable. There were no technical terms used and this was not necessary either. Through the usage of “I”, it is obvious what the student’s line of argument is throughout the essay but perhaps the word is best avoided. The fluency of the essay could be improved as there was a lack of linkage between the paragraphs – again something that many GCSE students find hard to do. The structure of the essay could be improved such that there are perhaps only 5 -6 paragraphs maximum. These paragraphs may be lengthy but would serve the student better than lots of smaller paragraphs. For this essay, I would outline ‘sections’ as: introduction (including any background knowledge to set the scene, such as the cause of the Reichstag Fire), how the Reichstag Fire was used to increase power (i.e. the Reichstag Fire consequences), other factors which also gave the Nazis more power and finally the conclusion.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 08/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why was Hitler so Popular in 1933?

    3 star(s)

    Hitler had carefully used terror, and not going to the extreme by killing thousands of people who took his name in vain, but still was strict and you were likely to get sent straight to the Gestapo without a trial or your own opinion.

  2. Reichstag Fire

    Also, the Reichstag fire was blamed on the communist party, who were at the time proving to be a real threat to the consolidation of the Nazis power. By blaming the communists, and having control of the national services for a certain period of time after the fire, Hitler was

  1. How significant was Nazi Propaganda in maintaining Hitler in power in the years ...

    (Geary, 1993, p.38) Furthermore, political opponents and Jews were 'removed' from the civil service and independent political parties and pressure groups were dissolved and declared illegal. (Geary, 1993, p.39). However, this repression and terror was constitutionally legal. Following the Reichstag fire, which the Nazis cleverly exploited to signal a possible

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    when it comes to such serious discussions; it is just too much. Some other quick reasons why to appease: Britain's small army was too weak to go to war in 1938; needed time to rearm. Rearmament meant high taxes, which made democratic leaders unpopular.

  1. "How influential was Hitler's role in the rise of the Nazi Party 1920-1933?"

    Now Hitler intended to take-over the whole of Germany and he intended to do this by force. On November 8th 1923 Hitler held a rally at a Munich beer hall and announced a revolution. The following day he led 2,000 armed SA troops in an attempt to take over the Bavarian government.

  2. Why did the Night of the Long Knives take place?

    This is linked to an addition point which is that the 'Night of the Long Knives' helped to establish a dictatorship as it led to the SA being under the control of Hitler. Previous to the incident, the SA played a considerable role in the Nazi party which included fighting

  1. "Night" by Elie Wiesel. Chapters 3,4 and 5.

    The bombing filled prisoners with hope that Germany would be defeated soon. Elie confesses: "I was a body. Perhaps less than that even: a starved stomach. The stomach alone was aware of the passage of time.", proving that Elie and other Jews have been treated inhumanly by the Nazis.

  2. Did Hitler succeed in creating a Volksgemeinschaft?

    Historian Ute Frevert argues that, "The woman who satisfies the political, racial and social requirements.....did not perceive the Third Reich as a woman's hell. Much of what was introduced was doubtlessly appealing." Until preparation for the war, ideals for Nazi women were firmly in place and were successful but it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work