• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

Extracts from this document...


Question One: Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917. The First World War was a different type of warfare in all aspects. The original idea of the war was that it would be a fast moving one lasting for a few months rather than years. However, the advances of the Allied and German forces, soon slowed to a sudden and unexpected halt. The result was both sides were forced to dig trenches to defend their positions. For many soldiers the trenches would be their homes. They would eat and sleep in them from 1915 to when the war finally ended. "There, much like animals, they would die, in the miseries and dangers of the trenches" Lyn McDonald, 1987. Trenches however were not a new type of warfare, they had already been used in the American Civil war, and proved to be a disaster, this information however, was not taken into account by the Generals of the war. One historian describes the trenches: "think about the basic requirements you need for a decent life...then take that away and add someone as little as 50 metres away trying to kill you and you've got a fair idea." Trenches varied in size, but were often two metres deep and about two metres wide. It had duck boards on the floor to prevent a form of gangrene known as 'trench foot' and a fire step which soldiers would stand on when looking out in to no man's land. Soldiers in the trenches had to endure the worst living conditions, they had to share the trenches with rats who thrived on the everlasting decomposing bodies. "...the trenches were alive with rats. The knowledge that the gigantic trench rats had grown fat through feeding on the dead bodies...made the soldiers hate them..." S. Case, 1976. Soldiers would have to sleep in the trenches were there was space. ...read more.


A. J. P Taylor, 1979. Army generals were so obsessed with previous war tactics, which was often a simple infantry and cavalry charge, that they misunderstood the significance of new weapons such as the machine gun, this was connected to the 'big wave theory.' Sir Douglas Haig a military commander said, "we must wear the enemy down as much as possible." Generals thought that they could use old and traditional techniques which had been successful in previous wars such as the Boer war in South Africa, however these techniques could not be successful in a completely different type of warfare. Sir Douglas Haig misunderstood the machine gun and paid heavily with the loss of thousands of British soldiers on the first day at the battle of Somme. Haig, before the war said, "The machine gun is a much overrated weapon." Generals were also not in touch with what was going on at the front line, so they failed to intervene when attacking tactics were clearly not working; "...tried out all the polo ponies to see if any would play. Going, Hadness Lloyd, Pennyman, Spencer Smith & Morgan Dien, Gillian played the piano & sang and we played bridge until 1:15am." 12th September 1916, from the diaries of General C. H. Lucas. This quote shows that generals were continuing their social life as normal despite the war entering an important phase. If attacks were failing it would be unlikely that they would be altered due to incompetent leadership. Inventions such as the Tank were beneficial at attacking in the later stages of the war. They were first used in the battle of the Somme in 1916, but they were easy targets for the Germans who had developed armour-piercing bullets or, more likely, suffered mechanical failure. "...bullet-proof armour [for the tanks] turned out to be no such thing against the German armour-piercing bullets." J. Terraine, 1982. ...read more.


Among other indiscretions...a speech made by a member of the government requesting workers...not to question why the Whitsun Bank Holiday was being suspended. A German commander commented that it was 'the surest proof that there will be a great British offensive before long..." A. J. P Taylor, 1979. This evidence intercepted was an instrumental factor in the Somme failing to reach British and allied objectives, as the Germans were prepared. The failure of the Somme offensive was particularly highlighted in the government. "Should I have registered rather than agree to this slaughter of brave men [at the Somme]? I have always felt there are solid justifications for criticism of me in that respect. My sole justification is that Haig promised not to press the attack if it came clear that he could not obtain his objective by continuing..." Lloyd George, British Prime Minister. The quote shows that the battle was a huge morale dent in Britain as well as the front line in France. The public was also very angry when information surrounding the battle leaked out and Haig earned the title 'Butcher of the Somme.' Haig however was pleased with the first day of the battle, writing in his journal 'all was well.' Prior to the attack Haig said "The nation must be taught to bear losses...the nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." Perhaps Haig never thought that the Somme was a failure as it did eventually reach some of its objectives, and he had expected heavy British casualties even before the attack. Despite the appalling death toll the British army did manage to reach some of its objectives. In the long term the French army and Verdun were saved as they were on the verge of total collapse. The battle had lasted for five months and the Germans had finally lost, as a result of having over 400,000 casualties. German morale was severely dented at the end of the battle. It was important that the allies won at the battle of Somme, as it was a step closer in Germany surrendering the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    on Austria and Turkey, and then declared war against Germany about one year later. The central powers lost the assets of Italy's men and supplies, and suffered a good deal of morale loss as a result. Although they did not play a major role in the overall allied victory, it

  2. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    There were an 'extraordinary number of rats' or 'millions' of them. They infested the trenches completely, everywhere from the dugouts to the duck-boards. They took food away from the soldiers, but also ate the dead bodies lying on the floor of the trenches.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Mostly because the Turkish navy closed the Dardanelles. The Dardanelles were the narrow straight rivers that linked up the Mediterranean Sea with the Black Sea. The Dardanelles were particularly important because this was the only way the Allies could get through to Russia with food, artillery; ammunition etc, without these Russia would starve, and most definitely be killed by the impressive German army.

  2. General Douglas Haig

    This source includes some of the other sources in the coursework booklet and talks about many of the mistakes Haig made as commander in Chief, such as his false intelligence reports and his decision to press on despite the high death rates.

  1. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    He assumed that the men would be able to walk over the top carrying heavy packs; however this was a dreadful miscalculation. The Germans had reinforced no - mans - land with barbed wire almost thirty metres, again destroying any chance of penetration.

  2. The first major German offensive occurred at Verdun.

    Source B: (Haig communicating to Lloyd-George during the Somme) At this time Haig was not actually the Prime Minister, but the minister of munitions, given the job of dealing with the military�s arms. There are two ways of looking at this source. Firstly we could see it as Haig trying to pass the blame onto Lloyd-George, basically stating that

  1. World War I in France 1916 - the Somme and Verdun.

    success, as he did win the war, but it did come at a terrible cost. Source E is from a book by Philip Warner about Field Marshal Haig and as there is no reason for Philip Warner to lie it must be considered reliable.

  2. Haig and the other British generals were incompetent leaders. How valid is this interpretation ...

    Soldiers who were lightly gassed would probably never recover while others were blinded for life or died a slow painful death. Soon both sides had gas bombs and carried gas masks as part of their equiptment. Although this new innovation failed, it?s an example of Haig and his generals perseverance

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work