• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960’s.

Extracts from this document...


David Gray Vietnam Coursework: task 2 Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960's. The military tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960's were very different. The USA with its modern fighting equipment believed it could win the war against the Vietcong whose Guerrilla tactics had been used to defeat both the Japanese and the French and could now be used effectively against the USA. The Americans regarded the Vietnamese as poor and backward peasants, underestimating the idealism of people who were fighting to defend their homeland. The Vietcong could not have succeeded in expelling the American forces without support from the USSR and China. The Cold War confrontation continued in Vietnam, a civil war hijacked by the USA, China and the USSR. The military tactics used by the USA in Vietnam can be defined by: - 'The art and science of employing the armed forces of a nation to secure the objectives of natural policy by the application of force, or the threat of force.' (Col Harry Summers, the Vietnam War Almanac). American tactics at the beginning of the offensive were: attrition, bombing, the use of strategic hamlets, defoliation and search and destroy. These tactics were chosen because of the successes which the USA had fighting against Germany and Japan in World War 2 and against North Korea and China during the Korean War. ...read more.


Operation Ranchhand was the code name for USAF's campaign to destroy vegetation. Millions of gallons of Agent Orange and other toxic defoliants were sprayed over South Vietnam. Throughout the war, in the field 'Search and destroy', was the tactic used by the US. The Vietcong were to be located and destroyed initially by bombing. Later this annihilation was carried out by ground troops. Whole areas of South Vietnam were designated as Free Fire Zones. In these zones troops were allowed to fire at will. Many villages were destroyed, razed to flush out 'suspected' Vietcong. This tactic gave way to many atrocities, Quote from school source book There were many instances of innocent civilians being killed by US troops. Support for the Vietcong amongst the South Vietnamese population began to get stronger. The tactics used by the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in the 1960's owe as much to the political struggle as to armed conflict. The guerrilla war began in 1959, when the North Vietnamese Politburo activated five to ten thousand Viet Minh soldiers who had been lying low. By 1964 there were 25,000 Vietcong guerrillas operating in South Vietnam reinforced by 570,000 North Vietnamese Army troops. By 1965, the political will of the peasants of South Vietnam led to the collapse of the South Vietnamese government. If the US had not intervened, communism would have spread throughout South Vietnam. The Vietcong were fighting a civil war and the tactics, which they used were those of guerrilla warfare. ...read more.


In 'Search and Destroy' missions more atrocities were committed, such as the one at My Lai where almost 500 men, women and children were massacred. 'Troops accosted a group of women... Then a soldier asked, 'Well what'll we do with them?' 'Kill them,' said another soldier. I heard a machine gun go off and when we turned around, all of them were dead.' (Source I, Edexcel booklet) Atrocities like this helped the Vietcong win even more support from the South Vietnamese people. P29 Aylett P1 Source book Heavy bombing, designed to bring the communists to the peace talks, appeared only to strengthen the Vietcong's resolve to carry on fighting. In 1969, Nixon began to bomb Cambodia, secretly in an effort to stop supplies coming along the Ho Chi Minh trail. In 1970, Laos also became a target for US bombing. In May 1972, Nixon ordered Operation Linebacker 1 a series of massive air strikes on key targets in North Vietnam. In December, 1972 Operation Linebacker 11 unleashed awesome destruction on North Vietnam. Two weeks later US ground forces left Vietnam. Although Col. Summers in his Vietnam Almanac, states, 'this decision to confront US Military power head on was a disastrous mistake for the Vietcong and the North Vietnamese were defeated at every turn', I think it was impossible for the US to win a war against a guerrilla army, because there were no fixed battle lines, the US did not respond with the correct tactics and ultimately, the US were prepared to destroy the country to save it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why the US withdrew its forces from the Vietnam War in 1973

    4 star(s)

    A common practice emerged, fragging, where troops would attack, and kill their commanding officers. It was acts like these that further laienated troops from one another and a break down in the chain of command within the US military and contributed to their withdrawal in 1973.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The Vietcong knew the terrain. They were able to communicate with the local people. They could live off the Americans by using their supplies. The were skilled and knew how to move around swiftly. The Americas on the other hand did not know the terrain and were getting trapped.

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    The chart is useful because It allows us to get an overview of how many men were send; it is also trustworthy because we think it was made by the American government so it would have been about their own country.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    however most of the attacks had been planned before hand in-case of emergency. While the source shows the US using technology (Planes and more advanced weapons) and military superiority it doesn't show how effective and the results these attacks had, also it doesn't show the Communist backing the NVA was receiving from the USSR and China.

  1. How effective were the US tactics of search and destroy and defoliation in the ...

    As this was the first war to be televised many people in the US saw the affect of napalm and the famous images of it being sprayed over people were published. Possibly the most famous image from the war the photo of ten year old Kim Phuc (Image 1)

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    It in fact went terribly wrong for the Communists resulting in the loss of 37,000 North Vietnamese and Vietcong soldiers in comparison to the 2,500 Americans. Although the US forces clearly gained victory over the Communists, the event that shocked the US public the most was the communist attack on the US Embassy in Saigon.

  1. How effective were the US tactics of 'Search and Destroy' and 'Defoliation' in the ...

    There are advantages to defoliation, but not as much as there are disadvantages. One advantage is that the chemicals actually achieved their purpose of clearing up the Ho Chi Minh trail by burning trees (Source 1). Also, the rate of casualties for 'cherries' was that there was a 70% chance

  2. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    They would want to know whether these missions and tactics were a success. Through the data you would be under the impression that all these operations were working well and all were a success. However, the reality was different, as these figures were mainly a lie.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work