• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the Ways In Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were Different The Suffragists and Suffragettes started off using fairly similar methods to try and get their point of view across but they gradually began to differ more and more. The main difference between their methods was that the Suffragettes used violence whereas the Suffragists used more peaceful methods. The Suffragettes began their campaign of violence in 1905 when they realised that peaceful methods were not really having an impact on their cause. ...read more.

Middle

The first woman to go on hunger strike was Marion Wallace Dunlop. She did this of her own free will but it soon caught on and suffragettes in prison would go on hunger strikes so that they'd be released. However, this did not work as the government brought in the cat and mouse act which let the suffragettes be let out of prison until they had recovered slightly, when they were re-arrested. However, there are very few recorded incidences of suffragists going on hunger strike. ...read more.

Conclusion

The suffragists would never have dreamed of doing anything so radical to promote their cause. Another way in which their methods were different was that the suffragists held public meetings and sent out fliers to further their campaign. For example, they organised a peaceful demonstration in central London in 1908 where over 13,000 women paraded through town. The suffragettes did this too, but they concentrated more on their violent campaigns. The methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were essentially different because the suffragettes used violence whereas the suffragists preferred not to. 405 words. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe the Ways In Which the Methods of the Suffragettes and the Suffragists Were ...

    Until 1908 many Suffragettes members also belonged to the Suffragists whose opinion went against the Suffragettes when it changed in 1908 to attacks on property and people.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    In 1911 the Government promised a Conciliation Bill, it won a majority of 167 in parliament and it seemed that success was just around the corner. Then the Prime Minister (Asquith) dropped the bill! The Suffragettes were furious and they were now considering more and more drastic actions such as

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    Despite this crushing set back the Suffragists, unlike the Suffragettes still used the same tactics, and did not intensify or become more controversial. The government brought a new law in 1913; the Prisoner s Temporary Discharge for Ill Health Act - this was known as the Cat and Mouse Act .

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    being the idea that a particular party has and if they were to get into power that would be what they would do. Parliamentary lobbying was very and highly unsuccessful as women who were caught in the act were taken away and then would've been pushed and pulled until their

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    At this time there was no WSPU and so all of the methods wee completely peaceful. Towards the end of the 1800's Emmeline Pankhurst formed the WSPU at her home in Manchester after she had left the NUWSS. This had split the campaigning for women's suffrage into two groups with differing views.

  2. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The work of the NUWSS continued throughout the early years of the twentieth century. Some women, however, became dissatisfied with peaceful methods and thought that the only way to get votes for women was by using more aggressive methods. These women formed the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU, also known as the Suffragettes).

  1. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods Of The

    The Suffragists believed law-abiding women would prove themselves responsible enough to participate fully in politics. The Suffragists weren't as victorious as some hoped. Some women felt that progress was slow and nothing really changed and happened. The only thing they did was gain a bit of publicity but it wasn't anything that made much effect.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes differ

    When Herbert Asquith became Prime Minister the NUWSS became annoyed. He was from the liberal party but completely disagrees with the right for women to vote. In 1912 NUWSS took the vote and broke away from the liberals to support the Labour Party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work