• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different?

Extracts from this document...


Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different? The suffragists were different from the suffragettes because the suffragists used moderate and peaceful methods to get through their argument but the suffragettes thought that the suffragists idea was working too slowly so they wanted to be completely opposite to them so they used militant methods. The suffragettes believed in 'Deeds Not Words' and especially when they knew that the Liberal Government was not going to introduce reforms, so they turned to militant methods. The suffragettes restricted membership of WSPU to women and to men, which meant men were not allowed to join. ...read more.


left the WSPU, which led to a split of the WSPU, and they began to work on their own for votes for women. They both believed that more violence would not achieve nothing and soon Sylvia Pankhurst started to drift away and started to help the poor of in the East End of London. As it got worse Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst was left in charge. The difference between the two groups tactics Is that the suffragists ran meetings in almost all constituencies in the run up to the General Election, they held their own first ever procession, they lead a deputation to see the prime minister, their leader also held a public debate with her opponents and also raises a petition of 280,000 signatures and ...read more.


The suffragettes were furious because they wanted a proper Suffrage Bill dealing only with women. The attitude of the government was that there were other issues that were much more pressing and urgent than a separate Bill on votes for women. The campaign became more violent. Suffragettes smashed windows, set fire to letterboxes and damaged cricket pitches and golf courses. Bombs were placed in warehouses, and telephone wires were cut. Art galleries closed after suffragettes slashed valuable paintings. To conclude, the groups are very different and both use different methods to conclude but the suffragists use peaceful and moderate methods and thoughts in their protests but the suffragettes used more violence, were more direct and used militant methods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Suffragettes.

    They did many jobs including working as nurses and doctors and speakers to encourage people to join the army e.t.c.

  2. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    The Liberal reforms were a start. Now at least workers had some protection from some of the main causes of poverty. The Liberals had never intended to take over complete responsibility for the welfare of the British people, they had wanted to provide some sort of a safety net to prevent people falling into absolute poverty.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    The men (government) did not think that they could be trusted with the vote because they were so wild and irresponsible in using violence and heckling at MPs. The Suffragists were seen as calm and could be considered responsible enough to decide who would go into government.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the Suffragettes were ...

    They smashed shop windows on a large scale and began to use arson as a regular weapon. They would cause any destruction they could except for deliberate injury to people. Many buildings were set on fire, including a church, a voluntary hospital and a railway station.

  1. The Militant Suffragettes

    The end is put up the right and left nostril on alternative days. The sensation is most painful - the drums of the ears seem to be bursting and there is a horrible pain in the throat and the breast.

  2. Describe the Ways In Which the Methods of the Suffragettes and the Suffragists Were ...

    Furthermore, participating took a great deal of courage beyond that needed for later processions; the marchers risked their reputations, their employment, and ridicule from the crowds. In 1907 the Suffragists adopted a new constitution, which strengthened it and its executive committee and for the first time it had its own offices, hired full-time staff and controlled its own funds.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    The one crucial different between the Suffragists and Suffragettes was that the Suffragists supported non-violent means of protest whereas the Suffragettes willing to undertake violent and antisocial techniques. It is not certain whether or not suffragettes were a help to the suffrage movement; they got the issues into the paper but mainly had bad publicity.

  2. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    Outraged by the lack of movement and being taken off the reform bill, they smashed windows all through the centre of London including Downing, Regent and Oxford Street. The retaliation of the WSPU in comparison to the reluctance to retaliate from the NUWSS shows a clear divide in the two groups and a massive difference in their attitudes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work