• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different In 1918 many women over the age of 30 gained suffrage and subsequently to this, in 1928 all women over the age of 21 were given suffrage in parliamentary elections. Before the vote for women was given, women were vigorously campaigning for suffrage. One of the main suffrage campaigning group was the NUWSS, (National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies), or other known as the Suffragists. This was a democratic organisation led by Millicent Garrent Fawcett. Contrasting this group was the more militant group led by Emmeline Pankhurst known as the WSPU, (Women's Social and Political Union), or also identified as the suffragettes. NUWSS and WSPU was different because of the methods they used, however, they were united in their cause. The NUWSS and WSPU started off with similar methods to campaign for women's suffrage. The Liberals who had recently won the general election and both the NUWSS and WSPU thought they had a better likelihood of acquiring suffrage from the Liberals. This encouraged the NUSWSS and the WSPU to campaign and put additional pressure onto politicians. Canvassing was one of the most frequently used methods both the Suffragists and Suffragettes used. The NUSWSS style of publicity was peaceful, moderate and law abiding whereas the WSPU's was bold and flamboyant. ...read more.

Middle

As a result, the WSPU called a halt to their militant activities and the NUWSS and WSPU worked hard to win the support of these measures. This portrays the similarity of the suffragists and the suffragettes as when there was hope the suffragettes attempted to shrew a willed front. This also showed that the suffragettes were initially a splinter group that emerged from the suffragists, so on the whole their methods of campaigning would always hold some similarities. The WSPU's peace had shattered in November 18th 1910, other known as Black Friday WHEN Asquith interfered with women's suffrage. This showed the increase of frustration in women's campaigning. 500 suffragettes marched into the House of Commons and the police did not handle the situation well, resulting in 150 women being assaulted. The suffragettes voiced their frustration at the Conciliation Committee, which inquired the events of 'Black Friday'. This highlighted the difference in the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes because the suffragists were greatly disappointed whereas the suffragettes were furious, which inspired them to used more violent methods in order to voice their anger. Both suffrage groups relied on publicity to a certain extent because they would allow the public to visualise their demands and gain more supporters. The suffragist's march of 6000 feminists carrying around 1000 banners about the urgent need for votes for women was a great success. ...read more.

Conclusion

The final major WSPU demonstration was very violent and portrayed the suffragette method of campaigning. In May 21st 1914 over 200 women had marched to Buckingham Palace with the intention of obtaining the King's support for women's suffrage. Most of the women were arrested due to the outbreak of violence and vandalism. This overall depicts the difference in the suffragettes and the suffragists because Buckingham Palace was the symbol of England and by protesting in it showed the importance of the vote for women. Furthermore, it illustrates that the suffragettes relied on publicity to get their voices heard as many newspapers captured the event, whereas the suffragists relied more on their democratic skills of campaigning. In conclusion the suffragists and suffragettes used different methods to campaign for women's suffrage. During the first phase of the campaign the WSPU used more peaceful methods of campaigning, yet even then it was close to breaking the law. During the second stage of campaigning, the suffragettes became much bolder and began breaking the law. By the third phase of campaigning the suffragettes had reached their peak of violence whereas the suffragists had always remained peaceful. Although both groups had the same aim, the suffragettes believed that more militant methods would be necessary. They constantly battled against the government whereas the suffragists attempted to work with the government. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Aims and Methods of Terroist Attacks

    Another role played by the United States in all of this is there detention camp called Guantanamo Bay, in Cuba. The civilised countries around the world have laws. Stating that someone can not be kept locked up without trial or charge for a small amount of time.

  2. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    It is also cheap and there will be no need for prior arrangements. The people answering the questionnaires will get a chance to consider their response. It will be better than having an interviewer, as there will be no biasness included.

  1. In what ways were the lives of children on the home front affected by ...

    The black market had many problems as it was expensive and items purchased with spare money may be shoddy. Items were from unknown locations and desperate mothers bought it. Children saw long queues for suspicious items. There wasn't enough food and Britain only grew enough food to fed 1 in 3 and children won't have got fed as much.

  2. Millicent Garrett Fawcett

    She's a very messed up woman, but of course it's the circumstances of the burden she has to shoulder on her own, that drives her to this. The paranoia of her secret being revealed, drives her completely nuts, and she is the one who actually, perhaps not expecting such a drastic outcome, causes the ultimate tragedy in the story.

  1. q5 votes for women

    Because women showed that they are responsible enough in the war, Herbert then believed "that some measure of women's suffrage should be given." These source supports the women war effort was the one that gave women the vote. On the other hand, I disagree that the work of the women

  2. Why, despite the suffragette activity, did women not get the vote by 1914?

    at the hands of men, but that is only because of the way that a woman brings up her children and the way she tends to run a family. The main purpose of Marie writing her book is to outline that in her opinion women shouldn't vote at all and lastly that she just doesn't like the suffragettes.

  1. The California Gold Rush.

    Now the Argonauts began divesting themselves of excess baggage until the trail looked like the line of retreat of a routed army. Alonzo Delano, a forty-niner, wrote on June 3: We were compelled to throw away a quantity of iron, steel, trunks, valises, old clothes, and boots, of little value

  2. The Third Crusade seen from different sides

    We can suggest that Amboise was trying to tell historian?s that the leader never used to fight in, during that period of time as ?one of them who is superior to any man we have ever seen they call him Melek Ric (King Richard)...?meaning King Richard?s army had a advantage

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work