• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different. In this essay I am going to describe the ways in which the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different. I will begin by explaining the terms Suffragist and Suffragette and the methods both organisations used to try to gain women the right to vote. The suffragists were members of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS), who campaigned using legal and peaceful methods. Millicent Garrett Fawcett became the president of the NUWSS after Lydia Becker died in 1890. She organised many meetings and presented massive petitions to Parliament. Even though the Suffragist movement progressed slowly, their efforts did have an effect on the government. ...read more.

Middle

The public gave members of the WSPU the name Suffragettes. Members of the WSPU no longer were willing to restrict themselves to the constitutional methods used by the NUWSS. Their motto was 'Deeds, not words', which meant that they were ready to take action to get what they wanted. The suffragettes wanted publicity and to be noticed so they disobeyed many rules to change in the Constitution. They chained themselves to railings in Downing Street and shouted 'votes for women', they threw stones and broke several windows of 10 Downing Street, and they burned churches, destroyed public buildings and private residences, exploded bombs and assaulted the police and individuals. Suffragettes also attacked art galleries, universities and railway stations. ...read more.

Conclusion

During the meeting the girls shouted out 'will the Liberal government get votes for women?' when Churchill refused to answer their question, they continued to repeat the question. They were then evicted from the meeting and were arrested and charged with assault. At another meeting in Birmingham where Asquith was speaking, two Suffragettes climbed onto the roof of a nearby building and threw slates through the glass roof of the hall. They were then arrested. The members of the NUWSS feared that the militant actions of the WSPU would alienate potential supporters of the women's suffrage. From the evidence above we can see that both organisations used different methods to achieve the same goal, which was to gain women the vote. The Suffragists used peaceful methods without harming anyone or anything while the Suffragettes used violence and lawless actions. The actions of the WSPU did more harm than good. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    right to vote, instead an assortment of small groups who made no significant progress. In 1897 the National Union of Women s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) was set up and was led by Mrs Millicent Garret Fawcett; made up of mostly middle to high class women, it s sole aim was to get the vote for women.

  2. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods Of The

    it could become important because the Government would not grant women the vote until they were forced to do so. They started arson attacks, targeting the houses like they did with the window owners. Slashing paintings in famous art galleries and pouring acid onto golf courses exclaiming "No votes and no golf."

  1. Describe the ways in which the method used by the Suffragists and the Suffragettes ...

    they really wanted to be able to do was to able to vote in major elections this again got the country talking about weather or not to allow women to had the vote.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    They started off less militant as the Suffragettes were a breakaway movement from the Suffragists, they had previously been campaigning through non-violent protests so their early campaigns did not take a dissimilar form. However, when many reform bills were turned down for the women's vote they began to become more militant.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    Following this incident the WSPU started to heckle at public meetings, demanding that women have a voice. In 1905 they also started deliberately to be arrested and sent to prison. They singled out MP's for their attacks as they blamed them for the situation they were in.

  2. The Militant Suffragettes

    When a few members of the WSPU tried to organise a meeting to make their organisation more democratic, Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst cancelled it. This prompted these three members to leave and form the "Women's Freedom League" when they left about 70 women left with them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work