• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different. In this essay I will be describing the differences between the methods of the suffragettes and the suffragists. I will make clear the methods of both groups and will then compare and contrast to show the differences. The suffragists were the calm and peaceful group and used constitutional and parliamentary methods. They were a non violent group and used approaches like writing letters and having meetings with members of parliament. The suffragists were lead by a woman called Millicent Fawcett who ran the NUWSS. This was the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies. It was founded in 1897 and united most existing societies as before there had been over 500 local branches but they were all working separately. The aim of the NUWSS was to improve women's political rights. They used methods such as reasoning and petitioning to achieve this aim. They also supported candidates who were in favour of women's suffrage and trained women to speak in elections. ...read more.

Middle

To go on pleading was undignified." This shows they were fed up wit the waiting game. The group they ran was called the WSPU, which stood for the Women's Social and Political Union and their motto was, ' deeds not words.' They used militant methods like hunger strikes and using loud megaphones to heckle speakers at liberal meetings. For example in 1909, Marion Dunlop became the first women to go on a hunger strike. Although they were fighting for women's suffrage, this did not include all women, as there original aim was to gain the vote for rich and propertied women. An example of the violent methods they used was in 1905 when Christabel Pankhurst was sent to prison for spiting and hitting a policeman. One of the most noted incidents was when Emily Davidson ran under the King's horse at the derby race in 1913. She was trying to emphasise the cause of women's suffrage. To show they had no fear, the suffragettes even attacked Buckingham Palace in May 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

A major difference was the methods they employed. The suffragettes used methods like direct action and were very violent where as the suffragists were the complete opposite. They used constitutional and parliamentary methods and were not at all violent. Another difference between the two was there membership and aims. The suffragists was open to all as they asked for support from men and women where as the suffragettes restricted membership to only women. Also the aim of the suffragists was to improve the political rights of women where as the suffragettes wanted to gain the vote for only rich and propertied women. Although there were many differences, there was a similarity. When the Second World War came, they both agreed not to campaign but to instead join in with the war effort by taking up the jobs of the men who had to go to the front line to fight. Although there was the one similarity between the suffragettes and the suffragists, they were vastly different in the style of membership, leadership and in the methods they used. Jasmeet Singh 11x1 History - 1 Mrs Carrington ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    This was caught on national TV and thousands of people showed up to her funeral. This is a clear symbol of the Suffragettes - hardcore campaigners, who would even sacrifice their own lives, much different to the Suffragists. Despite all of the set backs and the governments un-budging resistance, the

  2. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The Suffragists were a much bigger group. From their title you can see why. They were a union of different suffrage societies across the UK. The Suffragists had a very large number of members and generally the group were very open about what they did. Any major events they were going to do or take part in would be known by the media and public.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the

    The suffragettes used methods like sympathy and public attention. This method was used in every way to make people like the suffragettes. Women would go in hunger strike to get there rights some people went to prison or were forced to feed therefore this making the public fell guilty that they aren't not supporting the suffragettes aim.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different

    She had no patience with the slow moving campaign of the suffragists and wanted to keep the attention of the public newspapers and government on the campaign at all times. Their motto was "Deeds not words", in complete contrast to the idea of the "slow moving Glacier".

  1. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods Of The

    vote, these methods were not fully successful and easy for MPs to ignore, but some Members of Parliament had been won over, with several Bills in favour of women's suffrage gaining considerable support in Parliament, though not enough to pass any laws.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    to letter boxes, seared golf courses with acid, burnt down sports pavilions, broke street lamps, stomped on flower beds, painted "Votes for Women" on the seats at Hampstead Heath, plugged up keyholes with lead pellets, slashed the cushions of train seats, staged false fire alarms, threw rocks at the windows

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    At election time they helped and supported any candidate who supported the women's right to vote, they held processions, met politicians, met the prime minister and held public debates. Not one of their methods used violence in anyway; they put their argument across in a well mannered and structured way.

  2. Describe the ways in which the method used by the Suffragists and the Suffragettes ...

    This also got them in the news due to these places are meant to have very high security, but obviously not in these cases. Another stunt pulled by the suffragettes was as they knew that the prime minister of country was in Birmingham for a meeting, they got on the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work