• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different The National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) campaigned for Women's rights using peaceful methods. Its leader was Lydia Becker until she died in 1980. The leadership then fell to Millicent Garrett Fawcett. The NUWSS was given the nickname 'Suffragists' by the Daily mail. The Suffragists used, peaceful methods to try and achieve their goal of the vote for Women. These methods included: Petitions - massively signed petitions presented to the parliament. The petition in 1874 was the biggest of them all Leaflets/Posters - leaflets and posters were the most popular campaign methods for the Suffragists. They were made and distributed among everyone and often showed how badly women were treated and then later on how bad the Suffragettes methods were. Peaceful Protests - Lots of protests and marches were held all over England. Lots of these often included Suffragette as well as Suffragists but normally remained peaceful. A march in 1908 which went through central London and ended at the Royal Albert Hall consisted of over thirteen thousand women. ...read more.

Middle

The person only stops asking when the MP has given a suitable enough response. Disrupting Meetings - loud and rude behaviour during importing meetings causing it to stop until the person is removed. Chaining to rails - only done in particular places such as outside 10 Downing Street, where they can get the most attention. Stone Throwing - adopted by Edith New which included using weapons such as stone throwing. Hunger Strikes - Women would go on hunger strikes, mainly while in prison to get lots of attention and to get what they want. All of these were tactics that would get the person fined and/or thrown in prison. This would get that person a lot of attention and get the Suffragettes struggle for women's rights into the public eye. Further campaigning would let it stay in the public eye. As time progressed the tactics employed by Suffragettes became more violent. Stones were thrown at government windows and public, private property and paintings was also damaged. The government didn't listen to the Suffragettes which frustrated them even more causing them to employ even more violent tactics. ...read more.

Conclusion

This meant that groups across the UK would not know what other groups would be doing. The actions of the Suffragettes were very similar to terrorists. There was a dictatorship between Emmeline and Chrystabel Prankhurst. Anything they told the other to do, they had to do. Emmeline's other daughter; Sylvia was kicked out of the Suffragettes as she 'helped' the workers in London to much. The Prankhursts had turned on their own family. The Suffragists were continuously increasing in support and growing. The group never deviated from their purpose, they never strayed, and they were always intent on getting the Vote for Women. On the other hand the Suffragettes started losing support and became fragile. There were always arguments within the group about how far they had been and how far they were planning to go. As time went on, the tyrant leadership grew in dislike. Any questioning about the activities in the group would get you get kicked out, as did Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence and Elizabeth Robins. These are the differences in which the two major organisations are run and lead and the difference in which the activities they undertake differ from one another. ?? ?? ?? ?? Saqib Mughal 10.V ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. What were the main differences between the suffragettes and the suffragists?

    The Suffragists announced that they would be campaigning for the Labour Party at the next General Election, as it was the only political party that was committed to women's suffrage. On the other hand the Suffragettes just made their campaign all the more violent.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The German government initiated armistice talks (October) with the Allies, but they failed when President Wilson insisted on negotiating only with democratic governments. The British advance meanwhile made rapid progress in northern France and along the Belgian coast, and on November 10, US and French troops reached Sedan.

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    so in a dignified manner and when election times were near they would campaign for any candidate that believed women should get the vote. Mrs Fawcett wrote in 1911 that she wanted to show the whole world how to gain reforms without the need for any kind of violence a

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    cutting telephone wires, destroying golf greens where men would play by pouring acid on them, burning houses down e.g. David Lloyd George, throwing hammers through shop windows and going on hunger strikes. Perhaps the most important thing they did although this was not done by all suffragettes only one, it

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The WSPU were successful in gaining publicity as the press reported in great detail about the large rowdy scenes outside public halls, however due to their violent and militant actions all women were banned from Liberal meetings. The NUWSS however focused on other, more widespread issue, their organisation also grew

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the Suffragettes were ...

    This activity started as a symbolic protest by smashing the windows of government offices but later it was used for the deliberate destruction of property. The first suffragette to hunger strike was Wallace Dunlop on 2nd July 1908 and it was in protest at the government not treating them as political prisoners.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    to letter boxes, seared golf courses with acid, burnt down sports pavilions, broke street lamps, stomped on flower beds, painted "Votes for Women" on the seats at Hampstead Heath, plugged up keyholes with lead pellets, slashed the cushions of train seats, staged false fire alarms, threw rocks at the windows

  2. The suffragettes and suffragists

    Their homes were fire bombed. Golf courses were vandalized. The first decade of Britain in the 20th Century was proving to be violent in the extreme.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work