• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different The National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) campaigned for Women's rights using peaceful methods. Its leader was Lydia Becker until she died in 1980. The leadership then fell to Millicent Garrett Fawcett. The NUWSS was given the nickname 'Suffragists' by the Daily mail. The Suffragists used, peaceful methods to try and achieve their goal of the vote for Women. These methods included: Petitions - massively signed petitions presented to the parliament. The petition in 1874 was the biggest of them all Leaflets/Posters - leaflets and posters were the most popular campaign methods for the Suffragists. They were made and distributed among everyone and often showed how badly women were treated and then later on how bad the Suffragettes methods were. Peaceful Protests - Lots of protests and marches were held all over England. Lots of these often included Suffragette as well as Suffragists but normally remained peaceful. A march in 1908 which went through central London and ended at the Royal Albert Hall consisted of over thirteen thousand women. ...read more.

Middle

The person only stops asking when the MP has given a suitable enough response. Disrupting Meetings - loud and rude behaviour during importing meetings causing it to stop until the person is removed. Chaining to rails - only done in particular places such as outside 10 Downing Street, where they can get the most attention. Stone Throwing - adopted by Edith New which included using weapons such as stone throwing. Hunger Strikes - Women would go on hunger strikes, mainly while in prison to get lots of attention and to get what they want. All of these were tactics that would get the person fined and/or thrown in prison. This would get that person a lot of attention and get the Suffragettes struggle for women's rights into the public eye. Further campaigning would let it stay in the public eye. As time progressed the tactics employed by Suffragettes became more violent. Stones were thrown at government windows and public, private property and paintings was also damaged. The government didn't listen to the Suffragettes which frustrated them even more causing them to employ even more violent tactics. ...read more.

Conclusion

This meant that groups across the UK would not know what other groups would be doing. The actions of the Suffragettes were very similar to terrorists. There was a dictatorship between Emmeline and Chrystabel Prankhurst. Anything they told the other to do, they had to do. Emmeline's other daughter; Sylvia was kicked out of the Suffragettes as she 'helped' the workers in London to much. The Prankhursts had turned on their own family. The Suffragists were continuously increasing in support and growing. The group never deviated from their purpose, they never strayed, and they were always intent on getting the Vote for Women. On the other hand the Suffragettes started losing support and became fragile. There were always arguments within the group about how far they had been and how far they were planning to go. As time went on, the tyrant leadership grew in dislike. Any questioning about the activities in the group would get you get kicked out, as did Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence and Elizabeth Robins. These are the differences in which the two major organisations are run and lead and the difference in which the activities they undertake differ from one another. ?? ?? ?? ?? Saqib Mughal 10.V ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. What were the main differences between the suffragettes and the suffragists?

    They smashed windows, set fire to post boxes, bombed churches, and damaged cricket patches and golf courses. Bombs were placed in warehouses and telephone wires were cut. Art galleries had to be closed after Suffragettes slashed valuable paintings. More and more of the Suffragettes were arrested and sent to prison, where they continued to protest by going on hunger strike.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    and attack America's Southern states such as Texas and Arizona if America were to join with the Allies. This was the last straw and the American president Woodrow Wilson had no choice but to go to war with Germany. This was a great boost for the Allies, of course, because America was the richest country in the World.

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    and Agnes was a famous furniture designer. The reason I wrote about Elizabeth Garret Anderson was because she did a lot towards women becoming doctors and in the face of adversity (the government not letting her become a doctor) she came out victorious and if it wasn't for her maybe there wouldn't be as many female doctor as there are now.

  2. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The WSPU were successful in gaining publicity as the press reported in great detail about the large rowdy scenes outside public halls, however due to their violent and militant actions all women were banned from Liberal meetings. The NUWSS however focused on other, more widespread issue, their organisation also grew

  1. The suffragettes and suffragists

    She was killed and the Suffragettes had their first martyr. However, her actions probably did more harm than good to the cause as she was a highly educated woman.

  2. "Antis Had More Convincing Arguments than Suffragists and Suffragettes."

    avoid confrontation and other countries would see this as an opportunity to invade. On the other hand, women do understand that force is sometimes necessary and the Antis were taking a very stereotypical view. In fact, many of the Antis' arguments were based around unfounded stereotypical views of women.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    A now famous event happened on June the 4th 1913 when Emily Wilding Davison ran in front of the King's horse at the Derby and was killed. This made her a martyr and an example for all Suffragettes to follow.

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    The political part of the story for women is perhaps the only one in which more happened after 1900 that was significant than what happened between 1870 and 1900. My final thoughts on what went on between 1870-1900 are positive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work